An innovative evaluation platform for new aircraft concepts

Aeronautical Journal

Volumn 114, Issue 1157, 2010, Pages 451-456

  Schmollgruber, P ^a   Gobert, J L ^a   Gall, P E ^b   Goraj, Z ^c   Jentink, H W ^d   Nas A ^e   Voit Nitchmann, R ^f  

^a ONERA   (France)

^b AIRBUS   (France)

^c WARSAW UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^d NLR   (Netherlands)

^e SWEDISH DEFENCE RESEARCH AGENCY   (Sweden)

^f UNIVERSITY OF STUTTGART   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CURRICULA; FIGHTER AIRCRAFT; SPECIFICATIONS; TEST FACILITIES;

AIRCRAFT CONCEPTS; EARLY DESIGN PHASIS; EUROPEAN PROJECT; EVALUATION PLATFORMS; FLYING PLATFORMS; POTENTIAL BENEFITS; RESEARCH CENTRES; SYSTEM SPECIFICATION;

FLIGHT DYNAMICS;

EID: 79952263114     PISSN: 00019240     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0001924000003936     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. SCHMOLLGRUBER, P. Innovative evaluation platform assessment and feasibility, European Project NACRE, NACRE-DEL-T14-ONE-001, 2007.
2. Suspension Active pour essais en SOufflerie (SACSO), CARTON, P.,www.onera.fr/dcsd/sacso/index.php
3. WOLOWICZ, C.H., BOWMAN J.S. and GILBERT, W.P. Similitude requirements and scaling relationships as applied to model testing, NASA TP1435, 1979.
4. Description of work, Integrated Project NACRE (New Aircraft Concept REsearch), R 3.0, 15 May 2007.
5. KITTMAN, K. and SCHMOLLGRUBER, P. IEP model specification and design report, European Project NACRE, NACRE-DEL-T14-UST003,2008.
6. Terminology for unmanned aerial vehicles and remotely operated aircraft, Recommended practice, AIAA R-103-2004.