Optimum condition for the removal of Cr(VI) or total Cr using dried leaves of Pinus densiflora

Desalination

Volumn 271, Issue 1-3, 2011, Pages 309-314

  Park, Donghee ^a   Yun, Yeoung Sang ^b   Lee, Dae Sung ^c   Park, Jong Moon ^d  

^a Yonsei University Wonju   (South Korea)

^b Chonbuk National University   (South Korea)

^c Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^d Pohang University of Science and Technology (POSTECH)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Biosorption; Hexavalent chromium; Optimization; Pinus densiflora; Reduction

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL RESULTS; AQUEOUS SOLUTIONS; BATCH OPERATION; BOX-BEHNKEN; CHROMIUM SPECIES; CONTACT TIME; CR REMOVAL; DRIED LEAVES; EXPERIMENT DESIGN; EXPERIMENTAL DATA; HEXAVALENT CHROMIUM; OPTIMAL CONDITIONS; OPTIMUM CONDITIONS; OPTIMUM PH; PINUS DENSIFLORA; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; SECOND-ORDER POLYNOMIAL; SOLID PHASIS;

ADSORPTION; BIOSORPTION; CHROMIUM; CHROMIUM COMPOUNDS; OPTIMIZATION; PLANTS (BOTANY);

CHEMICALS REMOVAL (WATER TREATMENT);

ADSORPTION; AQUEOUS SOLUTION; BIOMASS; CHROMIUM; MUTAGENICITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OPTIMIZATION; REDUCTION;

PINUS DENSIFLORA;

EID: 79952243075     PISSN: 00119164     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2010.12.053     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Barnhart J. Occurrences, uses, and properties of chromium. Regul. Toxicol. Pharm. 1997, 26:S3-S7.
2. Mohan D., Pittman C.U. Activated carbons and low cost adsorbents for remediation of tri- and hexavalent chromium from water. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 137:762-811.
3. Yoon J., Shim E., Joo H. Photocatalytic reduction of hexavalent chromium (Cr(VI)) using rotating TiO2 mesh. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2009, 26:1723-1728.
4. Rudolf E., Cervinka M. The role of biomembranes in chromium(III)-induced toxicity in vitro. ATLA Altern. Lab. Anim. 2005, 33:249-259.
5. Baral A., Engelken R.D. Chromium-based regulations and greening in metal finishing industries in the USA. Environ. Sci. Policy 2005, 5:121-133.
6. Park D., Yun Y.-S., Park J.M. The past, present, and future trends of biosorption. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2010, 15:86-102.
7. Bhatti H.N., Bajwa I.I., Hanif M.A., Bukhhari I.H. Removal of lead and cobalt using lignocellulosic fiber derived from Citrus reticulate waste biomass. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2010, 27:218-227.
8. Srivastava H.C.P., Mathur R.P., Mehrotra I. Removal of chromium from industrial effluents by adsorption on sawdust. Environ. Technol. Lett. 1986, 7:55-62.
9. Park D., Yun Y.-S., Park J.M. Reduction of hexavalent chromium with the brown seaweed Ecklonia biomass. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38:4860-4864.
10. Park D., Yun Y.-S., Jo J.H., Park J.M. Mechanism of hexavalent chromium removal by dead biomass of Aspergillus niger. Water Res. 2005, 39:533-540.
11. Park D., Yun Y.-S., Park J.M. Studies on hexavalent chromium biosorption by chemically-treated biomass of Ecklonia sp. Chemosphere 2005, 60:1356-1364.
12. Park D., Lim S.-R., Yun Y.-S., Park J.M. Reliable evidences that the removal mechanism of hexavalent chromium by natural biomaterials is adsorption-coupled reduction. Chemosphere 2007, 70:298-305.
13. Wu J., Zhang H., He P.-J., Yao Q., Shao L.-M. Cr(VI) removal from aqueous solution by dried activated sludge biomass. J. Hazard. Mater. 2010, 176:697-703.
14. Janoš P., Hůla V., Bradnovà P., Pilařová V., Šedlbauer J. Reduction and immobilization of hexavalent chromium with coal- and humate-based sorbents. Chemosphere 2009, 75:732-738.
15. Escudero C., Fiol N., Poch J., Villaescusa I. Modeling of kinetics of Cr(VI) sorption onto grape stalk waste in a stirred batch reactor. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 170:286-291.
16. Prabhakaran S.K., Vijayaraghavan K., Balasubramanian R. Removal of Cr(VI) ions by spent tea and coffee dusts: reduction to Cr(III) and biosorption. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2009, 48:2113-2117.
17. Deng L., Zhang Y., Qin J., Wang X., Zhu X. Biosorption of Cr(VI) from aqueous solutions by nonliving green algae Cladophora albida. Miner. Eng. 2009, 22:372-377.
18. Murphy V., Tofail S.A.M., Hughes H., McLoughlin P. A novel study of hexavalent chromium detoxification by selected seaweed species using SEM-EDX and XPS analysis. Chem. Eng. J. 2009, 148:425-433.
19. Clesceri L.S., Greenberg A.E., Eaton A.D. Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater 1998, 366-368. American Public Health Association, American Water Work Association, and Water Environment Federation, Washington. 20th Ed.
20. Murugesan S., Rajiv S., Thanapalan M. Optimization of process variables for a biosorption of nickel(II) using response surface method. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 2009, 26:364-370.
21. Carmona M.E.R., da Silva M.A.P., Ferreira Leite S.G. Biosorption of chromium using factorial experimental design. Process Biochem. 2005, 40:779-788.
22. Kiran B., Kaushik A., Kaushik C.P. Response surface methodological approach for optimizing removal of Cr(VI) from aqueous solution using immobilized cyanobacterium. Chem. Eng. J. 2007, 126:147-153.
23. Brasil J.L., Ev R.R., Milcharek C.D., Martins L.C., Pavan F.A., dos Santos A.A., Dias S.L.P., Dupont J., Zapata Noreña C.P., Lima E.C. Statistical design of experiments as a tool for optimizing the batch conditions to Cr(VI) biosorption on Araucaria angustifolia wastes. J. Hazard. Mater. 2006, 133:143-153.
24. Park D., Yun Y.-S., Jo J.H., Park J.M. Biosorption process for treatment of electroplating wastewater containing Cr(VI): Laboratory-scale feasibility test. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2006, 45:5059-5065.
25. Myers R.H., Montgomery D.C. Response Surface Methodology: Process and Product Optimization using Designed Experiments 2002, John Wiley & Sons, New York.
26. Wittbrodt P.R., Palmer C.D. Effect of temperature, ionic strength, background electrolytes, and Fe(III) on the reduction of hexavalent chromium by soil humic substances. Environ. Sci. Technol. 1996, 30:2470-2477.