Synthetic circuit identifies subpopulations with sustained memory of DNA damage

Genes and Development

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 434-439

  Burrill, Devin R ^a   Silver, Pamela A ^a,b  

^a HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

^b HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bistable; Cell fate; DNA damage; Heterogeneous; Synthetic circuit

Indexed keywords

IRON; X BOX BINDING PROTEIN 1;

ARTICLE; CELL FATE; DNA DAMAGE; DNA MICROARRAY; DNA REPAIR; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE; FLUORESCENCE ACTIVATED CELL SORTING; FLUORESCENCE MICROSCOPY; GENE EXPRESSION; MITOCHONDRIAL RESPIRATION; MUTATION RATE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROMOTER REGION; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STARVATION; WILD TYPE;

BIOENGINEERING; CELL RESPIRATION; DNA DAMAGE; GENE EXPRESSION REGULATION, FUNGAL; IRON; MUTATION; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE PROTEINS;

EID: 79952214973     PISSN: 08909369     EISSN: 15495477     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1101/gad.1994911     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Aguilaniu H, Gustafsson L, Rigoulet M, Nystrom T. 2003. Asymmetric inheritance of oxidatively damaged proteins during cytokinesis. Science 299: 1751-1753. (Pubitemid 36337204)
2. Ajo-Franklin CM, Drubin DA, Eskin JA, Gee EPS, Landgraf D, Phillips I, Silver PA. 2007. Rational design of memory in eukaryotic cells. Genes Dev 21: 2271-2276. (Pubitemid 47443332)
3. Avery SV. 2006. Microbial cell individuality and the underlying sources of heterogeneity. Nat Rev Microbiol 4: 577-587. (Pubitemid 44317020)
4. Bartek J, Lukas J. 2007. DNA damage checkpoints: from initiation to recovery or adaptation. Curr Opin Cell Biol 19: 238-245. (Pubitemid 46386406)
5. Basrai MA, Velculescu VE, Kinzler KW, Hieter P. 1999. NORF5/HUG1 is a component of the MEC1-mediated checkpoint response to DNA damage and replication arrest in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Mol Cell Biol 19: 7041-7049. (Pubitemid 29441886)
6. Benton MG, Somasundaram S, Glasner JD, Palecek SP. 2006. Analyzing the dose- dependence of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae global transcriptional response to methyl methanesulfonate and ionizing radiation. BMC Genomics 7: 305-323.
7. Berthelet S, Usher J, Shulist K, Hamza A, Maltez N, Johnston A, Fong Y, Harris LJ, Baetz K. 2010. Functional genomics analysis of the Saccharomyces cerevisiae iron responsive transcriptional factor Aft1 reveals iron-independent functions. Genetics 185: 1111-1128.
8. Bishop AL, Rab FA, Sumner ER, Avery SV. 2007. Phenotypic heterogeneity can enhance rare-cell survival in 'stress sensitive' yeast populations. Mol Microbiol 63: 507-520.
9. Burrill DR, Silver PA. 2010. Making cellular memories. Cell 140: 13-18.
10. Crouse GF. 2000. Mutagenesis assays in yeast. Methods 22: 116-119. (Pubitemid 32896715)
11. Davies BW, Kohanski MA, Simmons LA, Winkler JA, Collins JJ, Walker GC. 2009. Hydroxyurea induces hydroxyl radical-mediated cell death in Escherichia coli. Mol Cell 36: 845-860.
12. Dubacq C, Chevalier A, Courbeyrette R, Petat C, Gidrol X, Mann C. 2006. Role of the ironmobilization and oxidative stress regulons in the genomic response of yeast to hydroxyurea. Mol Genet Genomics 275: 114-124. (Pubitemid 43228128)
13. Fu Y, Pastushok L, Xiao W. 2008. DNA damage-induced gene expression in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. FEMS Microbiol Rev 32: 908-926.
14. Galli A, Schiestle RH. 1996.Hydroxyurea induces recombination in dividing but not in G1 or G2 cell cycle arrested yeast cells. Mutat Res 354: 69-75. (Pubitemid 26238531)
15. Gasch AP, Huang M, Metzner S, Botstein D, Elledge SJ, Brown PO. 2001. Genomic expression responses to DNA-damaging agents and the regulatory role of the yeast ATR homolog Mec1p. Mol Biol Cell 12: 2987-3003. (Pubitemid 33062956)
16. Huh WK, Falvo JV, Gerke LC, Carroll AS, Howson RW, Weissman JS, O'Shea EK. 2003. Global analysis of protein localization in budding yeast. Nature 425: 686-691. (Pubitemid 37314307)
17. Kale SP, Jazwinski SM. 1996. Differential response to UV stress and DNA damage during the yeast replicative life span. Dev Genet 18: 154-160. (Pubitemid 26116860)
18. Khali AS, Collins JJ. 2010. Synthetic biology: applications come of age. Nat Rev Genet 11: 367-379.
19. Lee HC, Wei YH. 2005. Mitochondrial biogenesis and mitochondrial DNA maintenance of mammalian cells under oxidative stress. Int J Biochem Cell Biol 37: 822-834.
20. Puig S, Askeland E, Thiele DJ. 2005. Coordinated remodeling of cellular metabolism during iron deficiency through targeted mRNA degradation. Cell 120: 99-110. (Pubitemid 40094606)
21. Rasbach KA, Schnellmann RG. 2007. Signaling of mitochondrial biogenesis following oxidant injury. J Biol Chem 282: 2355-2362. (Pubitemid 47076768)
22. Schaus SE, Cavalieri D, Myers AG. 2001. Gene transcription analysis of Saccharomyces cerevisiae exposed to neocarzinostatin protein-chromophore complex reveals evidence of DNA damage, a potential mechanism of resistance, and consequences of prolonged exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci 98: 11075-11080. doi: 10.1073/pnas.191340698. (Pubitemid 32928685)
23. Sega GA. 1984. A review of the genetic effects of ethyl methanesulfonate. Mutat Res 134: 113-142. (Pubitemid 15216568)
24. Tan C, Marguet P, You L. 2009. Emergent bistability by a growthmodulating positive feedback circuit. Nat Chem Biol 5: 842-848.
25. Thorsen M. 2009. Genetic basis of arsenite and cadmium tolerance in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. BMC Genomics 10: 105-119.
26. Veatch JR, McMurray MA, Nelson ZW, Gottschling DE. 2009. Mitochondrial dysfunction leads to nuclear genome instability via an ironsulfur cluster defect. Cell 137: 1247-1258.
27. Whelan WL, Gocke E, Manney TR. 1979. The CAN1 locus of Saccharomyces cerevisiae: fine-structure analysis and forward mutation rates. Genetics 91: 35-51. (Pubitemid 9105420)