Erratum: Comparison of the effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch and gelatine on cardiac and stroke volume index: A randomized, controlled trial after cardiac surgery (Perfusion (United Kingdom) (2010) 104:6 (691-697) DOI 10.1177/0267659110377819);Comparison of the effect of 6% hydroxyethyl starch and gelatine on cardiac and stroke volume index: A randomized, controlled trial after cardiac

Perfusion

Volumn 25, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 283-291

  Schramko, Alexey A ^a   Suojaranta Ylinen, Raili T ^a   Kuitunen, Anne H ^a   Raivio, Peter M ^a   Kukkonen, Sinikka I ^a   Niemi, Tomi T ^a  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Cardiac index; Cardiac surgery; Colloids; Haemodynamics; Hydroxyethyl starch; Postoperative

Indexed keywords

GELATIN; GELATIN SUCCINATE; HETASTARCH; RINGER ACETATE; ISOTONIC SOLUTION; RINGER'S ACETATE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BOLUS INJECTION; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COLLOID; DRUG INFUSION; FEMALE; HEART STROKE VOLUME; HEART SURGERY; HEART VOLUME; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMAN; MALE; POSTOPERATIVE CARE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE RESPONSE; DRUG EFFECT; HEART; HEART FUNCTION TEST; INFUSION PUMP; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD;

AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; CARDIAC SURGICAL PROCEDURES; DOSE-RESPONSE RELATIONSHIP, DRUG; FEMALE; GELATIN; HEART; HEART FUNCTION TESTS; HEMODYNAMICS; HETASTARCH; HUMANS; INFUSION PUMPS; ISOTONIC SOLUTIONS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; STROKE VOLUME;

EID: 79952202188     PISSN: 02676591     EISSN: 1477111X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0267659115576476     Document Type: Erratum

References (30)

1. Boldt J. New light on intravascular volume replacement regimens: what did we learn from the past three years? Anesth Analg 2003; 97: 1595-1604. (Pubitemid 37475106)
2. Chappell D, Jacob M, Hofmann-Kiefer K, et al. A rational approach to perioperative fluid management. Anaesthesiology 2008; 109: 723-740.
3. Palumbo D, Servillo G, D'Amato L, et al. The effects of hydroxyethyl starch solution in critically ill patients. Minerva Anestesiol 2006; 72: 655-664. (Pubitemid 44251571)
4. Boldt J, Knothe C, Schindler E, et al. Volume replacement with hydroxyethyl starch solution in children. Br J Anaesth 1993; 70: 661-665. (Pubitemid 23169061)
5. Niemi T, Schramko A, Kuitunen A, et al. Haemodynamics and acid-base equilibrium after cardiac surgery: comparison of rapidly degradable hydroxyethyl starch solutions and albumin. Scand J Surg 2008; 97: 259-265.
6. Van der Linden P, De Hert S, Daper A, et al. 3.5 % urea-linked gelatine is as effective as 6% HES 200/0.5 for volume management in cardiac surgery patients. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 236-241. (Pubitemid 39022427)
7. Kuitunen A, Suojaranta-Ylinen R, Kukkonen S, et al. A comparison of the haemodynamic effects of 4% succinylated gelatine, 6% hydroxyethyl starch (200/0.5) and 4% human albumin after cardiac surgery. Scand J Surg 2007; 96: 72-78. (Pubitemid 46493769)
8. Marx G, Cobas Meyer M, Schuerholz T, et al. Hydroxyethyl starch and modified fluid gelatine maintain plasma volume in a porcine model of septic shock with capillary leakage. Intensive Care Med 2002; 28: 532-534.
9. Verheij J, van Lingen A, Beishuizen A, et al. Cardiac response is greater for colloid than saline fluid loading after cardiac or vascular surgery. Intensive Care Med 2006; 32: 1030-1038. (Pubitemid 43952718)
10. Karanko M, Klossner JA, Laaksonen VO. Restoration of volume by crystalloid versus colloid after coronary artery bypass: haemodynamics, lung water, oxygenation, and outcome. Crit Care Med 1987; 15: 559-566. (Pubitemid 17094093)
11. Moggio RA, Rha CC, Somberg ED, et al. Hemodynamic comparison of albumin and hydroxyethyl starch in postoperative cardiac surgery patients. Crit Care Med 1983; 11: 943-945. (Pubitemid 14209893)
12. Lobo DN, Stanga Z, Aloysius MM, et al. Effect of volume loading with 1 liter intravenous infusions of 0.9% saline, 4% succinylated gelatine (Gelofusine) and 6% hydroxyethyl starch (Voluven) on blood volume and endocrine responses: a randomized, three-way crossover study in healthy volunteers. Crit Care Med 2010; 38: 464-470.
13. Farstad M, Heltne JK, Rynning SE, et al. Fluid extravasation during cardiopulmonary bypass in piglets - effects of hypothermia and different cooling protocols. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2003; 47: 397-406. (Pubitemid 36438853)
14. Siggaard-Andersen O. The acid-base status of the blood. Fourth edition. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins, 1976.
15. Stewart P. Modern quantitative acid-base chemistry. Can J Physiol Pharmacol 1983; 61: 1444-1461. (Pubitemid 14190843)
16. Su F, Wang Z, Cai Y, et al. Fluid resuscitation in severe sepsis and septic shock: albumin, hydroxyethyl starch, gelatine or Ringer's lactate - does it really make a difference? Shock 2007; 27: 520-526. (Pubitemid 46626079)
17. Rehm M, Zahler S, Lotsch M, et al. Endothelial glycocalyx as an additional barrier determining extravasation of 6% hydroxyethyl starch or 5% albumin solutions in the coronary vascular bed. Anaesthesiology 2004; 100: 1211-1223. (Pubitemid 38541978)
18. Rehm M, Haller M, Orth V, et al. Changes in blood volume and hematocrit during acute preoperative volume loading with 5% albumin or 6% hetastarch solutions in patients before radical hysterectomy. Anaesthesiology 2001; 95: 849-856. (Pubitemid 32939106)
19. Kasper SM, Meinert P, Kampe S, et al. Large-dose hydroxyethyl starch 130/0.4 does not increase blood loss and transfusion requirements in coronary artery bypass surgery compared with hydroxyethyl starch 200/0.5 at recommended doses. Anaesthesiology 2003; 99: 42-47. (Pubitemid 36799031)
20. Haisch G, Boldt J, Krebs C, et al. Influence of a new hydroxyethyl starch preparation (HES 130/0.4) on coagulation in cardiac surgical patients. J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth 2001; 15: 316-321. (Pubitemid 32553378)
21. Zaar M, Lauritzen B, Secher NH, et al. Initial administration of hydroxyethyl starch vs lactated Ringer after liver trauma in the pig. Br J Anaesth 2009; 102: 221-226.
22. Bolli R. Myocardial "stunning" in man. Circulation 1992; 86: 1671-1691.
23. Tølløfsrud S, Svennevig J, Breivik H, et al. Fluid balance and pulmonary functions during and after coronary artery bypass surgery: Ringer's acetate compared with dextran, polygeline, or albumin. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 1995; 39: 671-677.
24. Lang K, Suttner S, Boldt J, et al. Volume replacement with HES 130/0.4 may reduce the inflammatory response in patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. Can J Anesth 2003; 50: 1009-1016. (Pubitemid 38139563)
25. Sade R, Stroud M, Crawford FA Jr., et al. A prospective randomized study of hydroxyethyl starch, albumin, and lactated Ringer's solution as priming fluid for cardiopulmonary bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 1985; 89: 713-722. (Pubitemid 16241964)
26. Ali M, Saleh M. Selection of optimal quantity of hydroxyethyl starch in the cardiopulmonary bypass prime. Perfusion 2004; 19: 41-45. (Pubitemid 38386648)
27. Persson J, Grande P. Volume expansion of albumin, gelatine, hydroxyethyl starch, saline and erythrocytes after haemorrhage in the rat. Intensive Care Med 2005; 31: 296-301. (Pubitemid 40362281)
28. Boldt J. Fluid choice for resuscitation of the trauma patient: a review of the physiological, pharmacological, and clinical evidence. Can J Anesth 2004; 51: 500-513. (Pubitemid 38594375)
29. Boldt J, Suttner S, Brosch C, et al. The influence of a balanced volume replacement concept on inflammation, endothelial activation, and kidney integrity in elderly cardiac surgery patients. Intensive Care Med 2009; 35: 462-470.
30. Witt L, Osthaus W, Juttner B, et al. Alteration of anion gap and strong ion difference caused by hydroxyethyl starch 6% (130/0.42) and gelatine 4% in children. Paediatr Anaesth 2008; 18: 934-939.