The effects of attending a diverse college

Economics of Education Review

Volumn 30, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 332-341

  Hinrichs, Peter ^a  

^a GEORGETOWN UNIVERSITY LAW CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Affirmative action; Diversity; Peer effects; Selection on unobservables

Indexed keywords

ESTIMATION METHOD; SECONDARY EDUCATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STUDENT;

EID: 79952188654     PISSN: 02727757     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.econedurev.2010.11.003     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Altonji, J. G. (1988). The effects of family background and school characteristics on education and labor market outcomes, mimeo.
2. Altonji, J. G., Elder, & T. E., Taber, C. R. (2002). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools, mimeo.
3. Altonji J.G., Elder T.E., Taber C.R. Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy 2005, 113(1):151-184.
4. Altonji J.G., Elder T.E., Taber C.R. Using selection on observed variables to assess bias from unobservables when evaluating Swan-Ganz catheterization. American Economic Review 2008, 98(2):345-350.
5. Angrist J.D., Lang K. Does school integration generate peer effects? Evidence from Boston's Metco program. American Economic Review 2004, 94(5):1613-1634.
6. Arcidiacono P., Vigdor J.L. Does the river spill out? Estimating the economic returns to attending a racially diverse college. Economic Inquiry 2010, 48(3):537-557.
7. Berkowitz D., Hoekstra M. Does high school quality matter? Evidence from admissions data. Economics of Education Review 2011, 30(2):280-288.
8. Boisjoly J., Duncan G.J., Kremer M., Levy D.M., Eccles J. Empathy or antipathy? The impact of diversity. American Economic Review 2006, 96(5):1890-1905.
9. Bowen W.G., Bok D. The shape of the river: Long-term consequences of considering race in college and university admissions 1998, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
10. Brief for Amici Curiae 65 Leading American Businesses in Support of Respondents in Grutter v. Bollinger and Gratz v. Bollinger (2003).
11. Card D., Krueger A.B. Would the elimination of affirmative action affect highly qualified minority applicants? Evidence from California and Texas. Industrial and Labor Relations Review 2005, 58(3):416-434.
12. Chatterji P. Does alcohol use during high school affect educational attainment? Evidence from the national education longitudinal study. Economics of Education Review 2006, 25(5):482-497.
13. Chatterji P., Dave D., Kaestner R., Markowitz S. Alcohol use and suicide attempts among youth. Economics and Human Biology 2004, 2(2):159-180.
14. Cortes K.E. Do Bans on affirmative action hurt minority students? Evidence from the Texas Top 10% Plan. Economics of Education Review 2010, 29(6):1110-1124.
15. Daniel K., Black D., Smith J. Racial differences in the effects of college quality and student body diversity on wages. Diversity challenged: Evidence on the impact of affirmative action 2001, 221-231. Harvard Education Publishing Group. G. Orfield, M. Kurlaender (Eds.).
16. Evans W.N., Oates W.E., Schwab R.M. Measuring peer group effects: A study of teenage behavior. Journal of Political Economy 1992, 100(5):966-991.
17. Grossman M., Kaestner R., Markowitz S. Get high and get stupid: The effect of alcohol and marijuana use on teen sexual behavior. Review of Economics of the Household 2004, 2(4):413-441.
18. Heinrich C.J., Mueser P.R., Troske K.R. The role of temporary help employment in low-wage worker advancement. Studies of labor market intermediation 2009, The University of Chicago Press. D.H. Autor (Ed.).
19. Holzer H., Neumark D. Assessing affirmative action. Journal of Economic Literature 2000, 38(3):483-568.
20. Holzer H.J., Neumark D. Affirmative action: What do we know?. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management 2006, 25(2):463-490.
21. Krauth S B. Peer effects and selection effects on smoking among Canadian youth. Canadian Journal of Economics 2005, 38(3):735-757.
22. Krauth B. Simulation-based estimation of peer effects. Journal of Econometrics 2006, 133(1):243-271.
23. Krauth B. Peer and selection effects on youth smoking in California. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 2007, 25(3):288-298.
24. Lazear Edward P. Educational Production. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2001, 116(3):777-803.
25. Long M.C. College applications and the effect of affirmative action. Journal of Econometrics 2004, 121(2):319-342.
26. Manski C.F. Identification of endogenous social effects: The reflection problem. Review of Economic Studies 1993, 60(4):531-542.
27. Millimet D.L., Tchernis R., Husain M. School nutrition programs and the incidence of childhood obesity. Journal of Human Resources 2010, 45(3):640-654.
28. Murphy K.M., Topel R.H. Efficiency wages reconsidered: Theory and evidence. Advances in the theory and measurement of unemployment 1990, St. Martin's Press, New York. Y. Weiss, G. Fishelson (Eds.).
29. Rothstein, J., Yoon, A. (2009). Mismatch in law school, mimeo.
30. Sacerdote B. Peer effects with random assignment: Results for dartmouth roommates. Quarterly Journal of Economics 2001, 116(2):681-704.
31. Sander R.H. A systemic analysis of affirmative action in American law schools. Stanford Law Review 2004, 57(2):367-483.