A general approach to the analysis of habitat selection

Environmental and Ecological Statistics

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 1-25

  Kneib, Thomas ^a   Knauer, Felix ^b   Küchenhoff, Helmut ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OLDENBURG   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Categorical regression; Compositional analysis; Habitat selection; Multinomial logit models; Penalized splines; Random effects

Indexed keywords

HABITAT AVAILABILITY; HABITAT SELECTION; HABITAT TYPE; NUMERICAL MODEL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STOCHASTICITY;

ANIMALIA; PASSERI; URSUS ARCTOS;

EID: 79952186129     PISSN: 13528505     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10651-009-0115-2     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aebischer NJ, Robertson PA, Kenward RE (1993) Compositional analysis of habitat use from animal radio-tracking data. Ecology 74: 1313-1325.
2. Aitchinson J (1986) The statistical analysis of compositional data. Chapman & Hall, London.
3. Alldredge JR, Thomas DL, McDonald LL (1998) Survey and comparison of methods for study of Resource Selection. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 3: 237-253.
4. Arthur SM, Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Garner GW (1996) Assessing habitat selection when availability changes. Ecology 77: 215-227.
5. Cooper AB, Millspaugh JJ (1999) The application of discrete choice models to wildlife resource selection studies. Ecology 80: 566-575.
6. Eilers PHC, Marx BD (1996) Flexible smoothing using B-splines and penalties. Stat Sci 11: 89-121.
7. Fahrmeir L, Tutz G (2001) Multivariate statistical modelling based on generalized linear models. Springer, New York.
8. Dailey M, Gitelman AI, Ramsey FL, Starcevich S (2007) Habitat selection models to account for seasonal persistence in radio telemetry data. Environ Ecol Stat 14: 55-68.
9. Hansbauer MM (2007) Responses of forest understory passerines to fragmented landscapes in the Atlantic Rainforest, South-Eastern Brazil. PhD Thesis, University of Freiburg.
10. Hooge PN, Eichenlaub W, Solomon E (1999) The animal movement program. USGS, Alaska Biological Science Center, Anchorage.
11. Johnson DH (1980) The comparison of usage and availability measurements for evaluating resource preference. Ecology 61: 65-71.
12. Johnson DS, Thomas DL, VerHoef JM, Christ A (2008) A general framework for the analysis of animal resource selection from telemetry data. Biometrics 64: 968-976.
13. Kaczensky P, Knauer F, Krze B, Jonozovic M, Adamic M, Gossow H (2003) The impact of high speed, high volume traffic axes on brown bears in Slovenia. Biol Conserv 111: 191-204.
14. Kaczensky P, Huber D, Knauer F, Roth H, Wagner A, Kusak J (2006) Activity patterns of brown bears in Slovenia and Croatia. J Zool 269: 474-485.
15. Keating KA, Cherry S (2004) Use and interpretation of logistic regression in habitat-selection studies. J Wildl Manag 68: 774-789.
16. Kneib T, Fahrmeir L (2006) Structured additive regression for categorical space-time data: A mixed model approach. Biometrics 62: 109-118.
17. Kneib T, Baumgartner B, Steiner WJ (2007) Semiparametric multinomial logit models for analysing consumer choice behaviour. AStA Adv Stat Anal 91: 225-244.
18. MacKenzie DI (2006) Modeling the probability of resource use: The effect of, and dealing with, detecting a species imperfectly. J Wildl Manag 70: 367-374.
19. Manly BFJ, McDonald LL, Thomas DL, Erickson WP (2002) Resource selection by animals. Kluwer, Doodrecht.
20. McCracken ML, Manly BFJ, Vander Heyden M (1998) The use of discrete-choice models for evaluating resource selection. J Agric Biol Environ Stat 3: 268-279.
21. McDonald TL, Manly BFJ, Nielson RM, Diller LV (2006) Discrete-choice modeling in wildlife studies exemplified by northern spotted owl nighttime habitat selection. J Wildl Manag 70: 375-383.
22. Mladenoff DJ, Sickley TA, Haight RG, Wydeven AP (1995) Regional landscape analysis and prediction of favorable gray wolf habitat in the Northern Great Lakes region. Conserv Biol 9: 279-294.
23. Posillico M, Meriggi A, Pagnin E, Lovari S, Russo L (2004) A habitat model for brown bear conservation and land use planning in the central Apennines. Biol Conserv 118: 141-150.
24. Schadt S, Revilla E, Wiegand T, Knauer F, Kaczensky P, Breitenmoser U, Bufka L, Cerveny J, Koubek P, Huber T, Stanisa C, Trepl L (2002) Assessing the suitability of central European landscapes for the reintroduction of Eurasian lynx. J Appl Ecol 39: 189-203.
25. Strickland MD, McDonald LL (2006) Introduction to the special section on resource selection. J Wildl Manag 70: 321-323.
26. Thomas DL, Johnson D, Griffith B (2006) A Bayesian random effects discrete-choice model for resource selection: Population-level selection inference. J Wildl Manag 70: 404-412.