Increasing coffee berry borer (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae) female density in artificial diet decreases fecundity

Journal of Economic Entomology

Volumn 104, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 87-93

  Vega, Fernando E ^d   Kramer, Matthew ^a   Jaramillo, Juliana ^b,c  

^a AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH SERVICE   (United States)

^b INTERNATIONAL CENTRE OF INSECT PHYSIOLOGY AND ECOLOGY ICIPE   (Kenya)

^c LEIBNIZ UNIVERSITY HANNOVER   (Germany)

^d NONE

Author keywords

artificial rearing; bark beetles; host marking pheromones; Hypothenemus hampei

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COFFEE; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HOST PARASITE INTERACTION; INSECT; LARVA; OVIPARITY; PARASITOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DENSITY; WEEVIL;

ANIMALS; COFFEA; FEMALE; FERTILITY; HOST-PARASITE INTERACTIONS; LARVA; OVIPARITY; POPULATION DENSITY; PUPA; WEEVILS;

COLEOPTERA; CURCULIONIDAE; HYPOTHENEMUS HAMPEI; SCOLYTINAE;

EID: 79952162061     PISSN: 00220493     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1603/EC10353     Document Type: Article

References (42)

1. Addesso, K. M., H. J. McAuslane, P. A. Stansly, and D. J. Schuster. 2007. Host-marking by female pepper weevils, Anthonomus eugenii. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 125: 269-276.
2. Amezaga, I., and C. Garbisu. 2000. Effect of intraspecific competition on progeny production of Tomicus piniperda (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Environ. Entomol. 29: 1011-1017.
3. Anderbrant, O. 1990. Gallery construction and oviposition of the bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae) at different breeding densities. Oikos 15: 1-8. (Pubitemid 20426294)
4. Anderbrant, O., F. Schlyter, and G. Birgersson. 1985. Intraspecific competition affecting parents and offspring in the bark beetle Ips typographus. Oikos 45: 89-98. (Pubitemid 16280072)
5. Anderson, P. 2002. Oviposition pheromones in herbivorous and carnivorous insects, pp. 235-263. In M. Hilker and T. Meiners (eds.), Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell Publishing, Berlin, Germany.
6. Baker, P. S. 1984. Some aspects of the behavior of the coffee berry borer in relation to its control in southern Mexico (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Folia Entomol. Mex. 61: 9-24.
7. Barbosa, P., T. M. Peters, and N. C. Greenough. 1972. Overcrowding of mosquito populations: responses of larval Aedes aegypti to stress. Environ. Entomol. 1: 89-93.
8. Bergamin, J. 1943. Contribuição para o conhecimento da biologia da broca do café "Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867)" (Col. Ipidae). Arq. Inst. Biol. (São Paulo) 14: 31-72.
9. Blomquist, G. J., R. Figueroa-Teran, M. Aw, M. Song, A. Gorzalski, N. Abbott, E. Chang, and C. Tittiger. 2010. Pheromone production in bark beetles. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 40: 699-712.
10. Butkewich, S. L., R. J. Prokopy, and T. A. Green. 1987. Discrimination of occupied host fruit by plum curculio females (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 13: 1833-1841.
11. Corbett, G. H. 1933. Some preliminary observations on the coffee berry beetle borer, Stephanoderes (Cryphalus) hampei Ferr. Malayan Agric. 21: 8-22.
12. de Kraker, J. 1988. The coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Ferr.): factors affecting emergence and early infestation. Centro de Investigaciones Ecoló gicas del Sureste, Tapachula, Chiapas, Mé xico.
13. Hoffmeister, T. S., and B. D. Roitberg. 2002. Evolutionary ecology of oviposition marking pheromones, pp. 319-347. In M. Hilker and T. Meiners (eds.), Chemoecology of insect eggs and egg deposition. Blackwell Publishing, Berlin, Germany.
14. Jaramillo, J., C. Borgemeister, and P. Baker. 2006. Coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): searching for sustainable control strategies. Bull. Entomol. Res. 96: 223-233.
15. Jaramillo, J., A. Chabi-Olaye, H.-M. Poehling, C. Kamonjo, and C. Borgemeister. 2009. Development of an improved laboratory production technique for the coffee berry borer Hypothenemus hampei, using fresh coffee berries. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 130: 275-281.
16. Kozlowski, M. W., S. Lux, and J. Dmoch. 1983. Oviposition behaviour and pod marking in the cabbage seed weevil, Ceutorhynchus assimilis. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 34: 277-282.
17. McMullen, L. H., and M. D. Atkins. 1961. Intraspecific competition as a factor in the natural control of the Douglas-fir beetle. For. Sci. 7: 197-201.
18. Messina, F. J., and J.A.A. Renwick. 1985a. Ability of ovipositing seed beetles to discriminate between seeds with differing egg loads. Ecol. Entomol. 10: 225-230.
19. Messina, F. J., and J.A.A. Renwick. 1985b. Mechanism of egg recognition by the cowpea weevil Callosobrochus maculatus. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 37: 241-245.
20. Nufio, C. R., and D. R. Papaj. 2001. Host marking behavior in phytophagous insects and parasitoids. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 99: 273-293.
21. Ochoa Milian, H., and B. Decazy. 1987. Estudio de un tipo de muestreo para determinar el índice de combate de la broca del fruto del café, pp. 44-68. In N. E. Urbina and B. Decazy (eds.), Memoria del II taller de trabajo internacional sobre manejo integrado de la broca del grano del café (Hypothenemus hampei, Ferr.), 1-5 de Diciembre de 1986, Tapachula, México. Instituto Interamericano de Cooperación para la Agricultura, Guatemala.
22. Oshima, K., H. Honda, and I. Yamamota. 1973. Isolation of an oviposition marker from Azuki bean weevil, Callosobrochus chinensis (L.). Agric. Biol. Chem. 37: 2679-2680.
23. Pérez-López, E. J., A. E. Bustillo-Pardey, M. T. González- García, and F. J. Posada-Flórez. 1995. Comparación de dos dietas merídicas para la cría de Hypothenemus hampei. Cenicafé 46: 189-195.
24. Peters, T. M., and P. Barbosa. 1977. Influence of population density on size, fecundity, and developmental rate of insects in culture. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 22: 431-450.
25. Portilla-Reina, M. 1999. Desarrollo y evaluación de una nueva dieta artificial para criar Hypothemenus hampei. Cenicafé 50: 24-38.
26. Portilla, R., M., and D. Streett. 2006. Nuevas técnicas de producción masiva automatizada de Hypothenemus hampei sobre la dieta artificial Cenibroca modificada. Cenicafé. 57: 37-50.
27. Prokopy, R. J. 1972. Evidence for a marking pheromone deterring repeated oviposition in apple maggot flies. Environ. Entomol. 1: 326-332.
28. Prokopy, R. J. 1975. Oviposition-deterring fruit marking pheromone in Rhagoletis fausta. Environ. Entomol. 4: 298-300.
29. Prokopy, R. J., and D. R. Papaj. 2000. Behavior of flies of the genera Rhagoletis, Zonosemata, and Carpomya (Trypetinae: Carpomyina), pp. 219-252. In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom (eds.), Fruit flies (Tephritidae): phylogeny and evolution of behavior. CRC, Boca Raton, FL.
30. Prokopy, R. J., J. R. Ziegler, and T.T.Y. Wong. 1978. Deterrence of repeated oviposition by fruit-marking pheromone in Ceratitis capitata (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 4: 55-63.
31. Pureswaran, D. S., G. Gries, J. H. Borden, and H. D. Pierce, Jr. 2000. Dynamics of pheromone production and communication in the mountain pine beetle, Dendroctonus ponderosae Hopkins, and the pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera: Scolytidae). Chemoecology 10: 153-168.
32. R Development Core Team. 2009. R: a language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. (http://www.R-project.org).
33. Reeve, J. D., D. J. Rhodes, and P. Turchin. 1998. Scramble competition in the southern pine beetle, Dendroctonus frontalis. Ecol. Entomol. 23: 433-443. (Pubitemid 28537405)
34. Roitberg, B. D., and R. J. Prokopy. 1987. Insects that mark host plants. Bioscience 37: 400-406.
35. Sallé, A., and K. F. Raffa. 2007. Interactions among intraspecific competition, emergence patterns, and host selection behaviour in Ips pini (Coleoptera: Scolytinae). Ecol. Entomol. 32: 162-171.
36. Sauvard, D. 1989. Capacités de multiplication de Tomicus piniperda L. (Col.: Scolytidae). I. Effets de la densité d'attaque. J. Appl. Entomol. 108: 164-181.
37. Sørensen, J. G., and V. Loeschcke. 2001. Larval crowding in Drosophila melanogaster induces Hsp70 expression, and leads to increased adult longevity and adult thermal stress resistance. J. Insect Physiol. 47: 1301-1307. (Pubitemid 33031956)
38. Stansly, P., and J. Cate. 1984. Discrimination by ovipositing boll weevils against previously infested Hampea flower buds. Environ. Entomol. 13: 1361-1365.
39. Tothill, J. D. 1940. Agriculture in Uganda. Oxford University Press. London, United Kingdom.
40. Vega, F. E. 2008. Coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae: Scolytinae), pp. 959-960. In J. L. Capinera (ed.), Encyclopedia of entomology, 2nd ed. Springer, New York.
41. Vega, F. E., F. Infante, A. Castillo, and J. Jaramillo. 2009. The coffee berry borer, Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae): a short review, with recent findings and future research directions. Terr. Arthropod Rev. 2: 129-147.
42. Villacorta, A., and J. F. Barrera. 1993. Nova dieta merídica para criação de Hypothenemus hampei (Ferrari, 1867). An. Soc. Entomol. Bras. 22: 405-409.