A unified framework for studying parameter identifiability and estimation in biased sampling designs

Biometrika

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 163-175

  Chen, Hua Yun ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS AT CHICAGO   (United States)

Author keywords

Case control design; Matched case control design; Outcome dependent sampling design; Profile likelihood; Weak identifiability

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952144843     PISSN: 00063444     EISSN: 14643510     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/biomet/asq059     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. ANDERSON, J. A. (1972). Separate sample logistic discrimination. Biometrika 59, 19-35.
2. BRESLOW, N. E. (1976). Regression analysis of the log odds ratio: a method for retrospective studies. Biometrics 32, 409-16.
3. BRESLOW, N. E. (1981). Odds ratio estimators when the data are sparse. Biometrika 68, 73-84.
4. BRESLOW, N. E. (1996). Statistics in epidemiol (Pubitemid 126353363)
5. BRESLOW, N. E. & DAY, N. (1980). Statistical Methods in Cancer Research. Volume I: The Analysis of Case-control Studies. IARC Scientific Publications. Lyon: IARC.
6. CHATTERJEE, N. & CARROLL, R. J. (2005). Semiparametric maximum likelihood estimation exploiting geneenvironment independence in case-control studies. Biometrika 92, 399-418. (Pubitemid 40937643)
7. CHEN, H. Y. (2003). A note on prospective analysis of outcome-dependent samples. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 65, 575-84. (Pubitemid 36607806)
8. CHEN, H. Y. (2004).Nonparametric and semiparametric models formissing covariates in parametric regressions. J. Am. Statist. Assoc. 99, 1176-89. (Pubitemid 39665961)
9. CHEN, H. Y. (2007). A semiparametric odds ratio model for measuring association. Biometrics 63, 413-21.
10. CHEN, H. Y. (2010). Compatibility of conditionally specified models. Statist. Prob. Lett. 80, 670-7.
11. COPELAND, K. T., CHECKOWAY, H.,MCMICHAEL, A. J. & HOLBROOK, R. H. (1977). Bias due to misclassification in estimation of relative risk. Am. J. Epidemiol. 105, 488-95. (Pubitemid 8112070)
12. LEE, A. J.,MCMURCHY, L. & SCOTT, A. J. (1997). Re-using data from case-control studies. Statist. Med. 16, 1377-89. (Pubitemid 27292270)
13. LIANG, K. Y. (1985). Odds ratio inference with dependent data. Biometrika 72, 678-82.
14. LIANG, K. Y. & QIN, J. (2000). Regression analysis under non-standard situations: a pairwise pseudolikelihood approach. J. R. Statist. Soc. B 62, 773-86.
15. NAGELKERKE, N. J. D., MOSES, S., PLUMMER, F. A., BRUNHAM, R. C. & FISH, D. (1995). Logistic regression in case-control studies: the effect of using indepedent variables. Statist. Med. 14, 769-75.
16. OSIUS, G. (2005). The association between two random elements: a complete characterization and odds ratio models. Metrika 60, 261-77. (Pubitemid 39604492)
17. PIEGORSCH, W. W.,WEINBERG, C. R. & TAYLOR, J. A. (1994). Non-hierarchical logistic models and case-only designs for assessing susceptibility in population based case-control studies. Statist. Med. 13, 153-62. (Pubitemid 24017109)
18. PRENTICE, R. L. & PYKE, R. (1979). Logistic disease incidence models and case-control studies. Biometrika 66, 403-11. (Pubitemid 10218387)
19. RABINOWITZ, D. (1997). A note on efficient estimation from case-control data. Biometrika 84, 486-8.
20. SATTEN, G. A. & CARROLL, R. J. (2000). Conditional and unconditional categorical regression models with missing covariates. Biometrics 56, 384-8. (Pubitemid 30422625)
21. SCOTT, A. J. & WILD, C. J. (1997). Fitting regression models to case-control data by maximum likelihood. Biometrika 84, 57-71.
22. UMBACH, D. M. & WEINBERG, C. M. (1997). Designing and analyzing case-control studies to exploit independence of genotype and exposure. Statist. Med. 16, 1731-43. (Pubitemid 27355028)
23. WEINBERG, C. R. & WACHOLDER, S. (1993). Prospective analysis of case-control data under general multiplicativeintercept risk models. Biometrika 80, 461-5.