Biobank Informatics: Connecting Genotypes and Phenotypes

Methods in Molecular Biology

Volumn 675, Issue , 2011, Pages 343-361

  Litton, Jan Eric ^a  

^a KAROLINSKA INSTITUTE   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Biobank; Biobank Information Management System; Biological samples; Data integration; Informatics

Indexed keywords

ADULT; BIOBANK; DATA INTEGRATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENETIC RISK; GENOTYPE; HUMAN; HUMAN GENOME; INFORMATION SCIENCE; INFORMATION SYSTEM; LIFESTYLE; MEDICAL RECORD; PHENOTYPE; PUBLIC HEALTH; STANDARDIZATION; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; HEALTH CARE FACILITY; METHODOLOGY;

COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENOTYPE; HUMANS; PHENOTYPE; TISSUE BANKS;

MLCS; MLOWN;

EID: 79952117202     PISSN: 10643745     EISSN: 19406029     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-59745-423-0_21     Document Type: Chapter

References (36)

1. Betsou, F., Ferguson, M., Jallal, B. and Litton, J.-E. (2004) Biobanks: accelerating molecular medicine, challenges facing the global biobanking community, in Life science insights (Z. Zimmerman, M. Swenson and B. Reeve, eds.), IDC, Framingham, MA. pp. 1–31.
2. Mahan, S., Ardlie, K. G., Krenitsky, K. F., Walsh, G. and Clough, G. (2004) Collaborative design for automated DNA storage that allows for rapid, accurate, large-scale studies. Assay Drug Dev Technol 2, 683–9.
3. Ölund, G., Lilndqvist, P. and Litton, J.-E. (2007) BIMS: An information management system for biobanking in the 21st century. IBM Systems Journal 46, 171–82.
4. Litton, J. E., Muilu, J., Bjorklund, A., Leinonen, A. and Pedersen, N. L. (2003) Data modeling and data communication in GenomEUtwin. Twin Res 6, 383–90.
5. Haas, L. M., Lin, E. T. and Roth, M. A. (2002) Data integration through database federation. IBM Systems Journal 41, 578–96.
6. Ollier, W., Sprosen, T. and Peakman, T. (2005) UK Biobank: from concept to reality. Pharmacogenomics 6, 639–46.
7. Rhodes, R. (2002) A Healthy Approach to Data. IBM Systems Magazine.
8. Achard, F., Vaysseix, G. and Barillot, E. (2001) XML, bioinformatics and data integration. Bioinformatics 17, 115–25.
9. IBM Corporation. WebSphere information integrator, http://www-01.ibm.com/soft ware/data/integration 2010. Accessed on 30th Sep. 2010
10. Knoppers, B. M. and Saginur, M. (2005) The Babel of genetic data terminology. Nat Biotechnol 23, 925–7.
11. IBM Corporation. Data discovery and query builder, DB2 for i5/OS, http://www-03.ibm. com/systems/isoftware/db2 2010. Accessed on 30th Sep. 2010
12. Peltonen, L. (2003) GenomEUtwin: a strategy to identify genetic influences on health and disease. Twin Res 6, 354–60.
13. Herscovitz, E. (1999) Secure virtual private networks: the future of data communications. Int J Network Mgmt 9, 213–20.
14. Cimino, J. J. and Zhu, X. (2006) The practical impact of ontologies on biomedical informatics, in IMIA yearbook of medical informatics (R. Haux and C. Kulikowski, eds.), Schattauer Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Stuttgart. pp. 124–35.
15. Wang, A. Y., Barrett, J. W., Bentley, T., Markwell, D., Price, C., Spackman, K. A. and Stearns, M. Q. (2001) Mapping between SNOMED RT and Clinical terms version 3: a key component of the SNOMED CT development process. Proc AMIA Symp, 741–5.
16. http://www.who.int/classifications/icd/en/
17. http://www.nlm.nih.gov/research/umls/about_umls.htm
18. Selden, C. R. l. and Humphreys, B. L. (1997) Unified medical language system. Current Bibliographies in Medicine 8, 96
19. Rosse, C., Shapiro, L. G. and Brinkley, J. F. (1998) The digital anatomist foundational model: principles for defining and structuring its concept domain. Proc AMIA Symp, 820–4.
20. Rosse, C., Mejino, J. L., Modayur, B. R., Jakobovits, R., Hinshaw, K. P. and Brinkley, J. F. (1998) Motivation and organizational principles for anatomical knowledge representation: the digital anatomist symbolic knowledge base. J Am Med Inform Assoc 5, 17–40.
21. h t t p: // w w w . i f c c . o r g / i n d e x . php?option=com_content&task=blogcategor y&id=91&Itemid=150
22. Forrey, A. W., McDonald, C. J., DeMoor, G., Huff, S. M., Leavelle, D., Leland, D., Fiers, T., Charles, L., Griffin, B., Stalling, F., Tullis, A., Hutchins, K. and Baenziger, J. (1996) Logical observation identifier names and codes (LOINC) database: a public use set of codes and names for electronic reporting of clinical laboratory test results. Clin Chem 42, 81–90.
23. Stoeckert, C. J., Jr. and Parkinson, H. (2003) The MGED ontology: a framework for describing functional genomics experiments. Comp Funct Genomics 4, 127–32.
24. http://www.geneontology.org/
25. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Main_Page
26. Manfreda, K. L. and Vehovar, V. (2002) Survey design features influencing response rates in web surveys. in The International Conference on Improving Surveys, University of Copenhagen, Denmark.
27. Cook, C., Heath, F. and Thompson, R. L. (2000) A meta-analysis of response rates in web-or internet-based surveys. Educ Psychol Meas 60, 821–36.
28. Wyatt, J. C. (2000) When to use web-based surveys. J Am Med Inform Assoc 7, 426–9.
29. Sax, L. J., Gilmartin, S. K. and Bryant, A. N. (2003) Assessing response rates and nonre-sponse bias in web and paper surveys, in Research in higher education, vol. 44, Springer, Netherlands. pp. 409–32.
30. Miller, E. T., Neal, D. J., Roberts, L. J., Baer, J. S., Cressler, S. O., Metrik, J. and Marlatt, G. A. (2002) Test-retest reliability of alcohol measures: is there a difference between internet-based assessment and traditional methods? Psychol Addict Behav 16, 56–63.
31. Jackob, N. and Zerback, T. (2006) Improving quality by lowering non-response: a guideline for online surveys. in Quality criteria in survey research VI, Cadenabbia, Italy.
32. Fricker, R. D. and Schonlau, L. (2002) Advantages and disadvantages of internet research surveys: evidence from the literature. Field Methods 14, 347–67.
33. Ekman, A., Dickman, P. W., Klint, A., Weiderpass, E. and Litton, J. E. (2006) Feasibility of using web-based questionnaires in large population-based epidemiological studies. Eur J Epidemiol 21, 103–11.
34. Tolonen, H., Dobson, A. and Kulathinal, S. (2005) Effect on trend estimates of the difference between survey respondents and non-respondents: results from 27 populations in the WHO MONICA Project. Eur J Epidemiol 20, 887–98.
35. Fejer, R., Hartvigsen, J., Kyvik, K. O., Jordan, A., Christensen, H. W. and Hoilund-Carlsen, P. F. (2006) The Funen Neck and Chest Pain study: analysing non-response bias by using national vital statistic data. Eur J Epidemiol 21, 171–80.
36. Jousilahti, P., Salomaa, V., Kuulasmaa, K., Niemela, M. and Vartiainen, E. (2005) Total and cause specific mortality among participants and non-participants of population based health surveys: a comprehensive follow up of 54 372 Finnish men and women. J Epidemiol Community Health 59, 310–5.