Duplex ultrasound factors predicting persistent type II endoleak and increasing AAA sac diameter after EVAR

Journal of Vascular Surgery

Volumn 52, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 1147-1152

  Beeman, Brian R ^a   Murtha, Kathy ^a   Doerr, Kevin ^a   McAfee Bennett, Sandy ^a   Dougherty, Matthew J ^a   Calligaro, Keith D ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA HOSPITAL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL AORTA ANEURYSM; ANEURYSM RUPTURE; ARTERY DIAMETER; ARTICLE; B SCAN; BLOOD FLOW VELOCITY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DOPPLER ECHOGRAPHY; ECHOGRAPHY; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR ANEURYSM REPAIR; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; PREDICTIVE VALUE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SURGICAL PATIENT; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL TRANSPLANTATION; COLOR ULTRASOUND FLOWMETRY; ENDOVASCULAR SURGERY; HEMODYNAMICS; INSTRUMENTATION; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PROSTHESIS; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTER; REOPERATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTOR; TIME; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED STATES;

AORTIC ANEURYSM, ABDOMINAL; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; ENDOLEAK; ENDOVASCULAR PROCEDURES; HEMODYNAMICS; HUMANS; PENNSYLVANIA; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTHESIS DESIGN; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; REGISTRIES; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, COLOR; ULTRASONOGRAPHY, DOPPLER, DUPLEX;

EID: 79952111355     PISSN: 07415214     EISSN: 10976809     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.06.099     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Parodi JC, Palmaz JC, Barone HD. Transfemoral intraluminal graft implantation for abdominal aortic aneurysms. Ann Vasc Surg 1991;5: 491-9.
2. Heikkinen MA, Arko FR, Zarins CK. What is the significance of endoleaks and endotension? Surg Clin N Am 2004;84:1337-52.
3. Jones JE, Atkins MD, Brewster DC, Chung TK, Kwolek CJ, LaMuraglia GM, et al. Persistent type 2 endoleak after endovascular repair of abdominal aoric aneurysm is associated with adverse late outcomes. J Vasc Surg 2007;46:1-8.
4. Baum RA, Carpenter JP, Golden MA, Velazquez OC, Clark TWI, Stavropoulous W, et al. Treatment of type 2 endoleaks after endovas-cular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms: comparison of transarterial and translumbar techniques. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:23-9.
5. Zarins CK, White RA, Hodgson KJ, Schwarten D, Fogarty TJ. En-doleak as a predictor of outcomes after endovascular aneurysm repair: AneuRx multicenter clinical trial. J Vasc Surg 2000;32:90-107.
6. Dattilo JB, Brewster DC, Fan CM, Geller SC, Cambria RP, LaMuraglia GM, et al. Clinical failures of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: incidence, causes, and management. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:1137-44.
7. Lalka S, Dalsing M, Cikrit D, Sawechuk A, Shafique S, Nachreiner R, et al. Secondary interventions after endovascular abdominal aortic aneu-rysm repair. Amer J Surg;2005;190:787-94.
8. Faries PL, Cadot H, Agarwal G, Kent CK, Hollier LH, Marin ML. Management of endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: cuffs, coils, and conversion. J Vasc Surg 2003;37:1155-61.
9. Matsumura JS, Moore WS. Clinical consequences of periprosthetic leak after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysm. J Vasc Surg 1998;27:606-13.
10. Maldonado T, Gagne P. Controversies in the Management of type II "branch" endoleaks following endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. Vasc Endovascular Surg 2003;37:1-12.
11. Sheehan MK, Barbato J, Compton CN, Zajko A, Rhee R, Makaroun MS. Effectiveness of coiling in the treatment of endoleaks after endo-vascular repair. J Vasc Surg 2004;40:430-4.
12. Baum RA, StavropoulosW, Fairman RM, Carpenter JP. Endoleaks after endovascular repair of abdominal aortic aneurysms. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2003;14:1111-7.
13. Carter KA, Nelms CR, Bloch PHS, Gregory RT, Parent NE, DeMasi RJ, et al. Doppler waveform assessment of endoleak following endovas-cular repair of abdominal aortic aneursym: predictors of endoleak thrombosis. J Vasc Technology 2000;24:119-22.
14. Parent NF, Meier GH, Godxiachvili V, LeSar CL, Parker FM, Carter KA, et al. The incidence and natural history of type I and II endoleak: a 5 year follow-up assessment with color duplex ultrasound scan. J Vasc Surg 2002;35:474-81.
15. McLafferty RB, McCrary BS, Mattos MA, Karch LA, Ramsey DE, Solis MM, et al. The use of color-flow duplex scan for the detection of endoleaks. J Vasc Surg 2002;36:100-4.
16. Arko FR, Konstantinos FA, Siedel SA, Johnson BL, Drake AR, Fogarty TJ, et al. Intrasac flow velocities predict sealing of type II endoleaks after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. J Vasc Surg 2003;37: 8-15.
17. Schmieder GC, Stout CL, Stokes GK, Parent FN, Panneton JM. Endoleak after endovascular aneurysm repair: duplex ultrasound imaging is better than computed tomography at determining the need for interventon. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:1012-8.
18. Beeman BR, Doctor LM, Doerr K, McAfee-Bennett S, Dougherty MJ, Calligaro KD. Duplex ultrasound imaging alone is sufficient for mid-term endovascular aneurysm repair surveillance: a cost analysis study and prospective comparison with computed tomography scan. J Vasc Surg 2009;50:1019-24.
19. Ohki T, Ouriel K, Silveira PG, Katzen B, White R, Criado F, et al. Initial results of wireless pressure sensing for endovascular aneursym repair: the APEX Trial-Acute Pressure Measurement to Confirm Aneursym Sac Exclusion. J Vasc Surg 2007;45:236-42.
20. Steinmetz E, Rubin BG, Sanchez LA, Choi ET, Geraghty PJ, Baty J, et al. Type II endoleak after endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair: a conservative approach with selective intervention is safe and cost-effective. J Vasc Surg 2004;39:306-13.
21. Silverberg D, Baril DT, Ellozy SH, Carroccio A, Greyrose SE, Lookstein RA, et al. An 8-year experience with type II endoleaks: natural history suggests selective intervention is a safe approach. J Vasc Surg 2006;44:453-9.