Field evaluation of an innovative stormwater treatment device - The Stormvault™ system

Environmental Monitoring and Assessment

Volumn 169, Issue 1-4, 2010, Pages 113-123

  Zhang, Ru ^a   Zhou, Wen Bin ^a   Li, Jing ^b   Yu, Shaw L ^b  

^a BEIJING UNIVERSITY OF POSTS AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS   (China)

^b University of Virginia   (United States)

Author keywords

Removal efficiency; Statistical analysis; Stormvault ; Stormwater management; Ultra urban BMP

Indexed keywords

CHEMICAL OXYGEN DEMAND; EFFICIENCY; REMOVAL; STATISTICAL METHODS; STORM SEWERS;

AVERAGE EFFICIENCIES; FIELD-MONITORING PROGRAMS; POLLUTANT REMOVAL EFFICIENCY; REMOVAL EFFICIENCIES; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; STORM-WATER MANAGEMENTS; TOTAL SUSPENDED SOLIDS; ULTRA-URBAN BMP;

STORMS;

RAIN;

ARTICLE; EVALUATION; INSTRUMENTATION; METHODOLOGY; SANITATION; SEWAGE; WATER POLLUTANT; WATER POLLUTION;

DRAINAGE, SANITARY; RAIN; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS; WATER POLLUTION;

EID: 79952109750     PISSN: 01676369     EISSN: 15732959     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10661-009-1155-7     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. American Society of Civil Engineers (2002). United States Environmental Protection Agency. Urban stormwater BMP performance monitoring. EPA-821-B-02-001. Washington, DC: ASCE and USEPA Office of Water.
2. Brueske, C. C. (2000). Technology reviews. Ultra-urban stormwater treatment technologies. Washington, DC: Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of Washington.
3. City of Sacramento, Department of Utilities and Engineering Division, California (1999). Comprehensive Protocol for Performance Evaluation and Propriety Stormwater Control Products. Sacramento, CA.: URS GreinerWoodward Clyde,Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, and Urban.
4. Driscoll, E. D., Palhegyi, G. E., Strecker, E. W., & Shelley, P. E. (1989). Analysis of storm events characteristics for selected rainfall gauges throughout the United States. Washington, DC: US Environmental Protection Agency.
5. Eaton, A. D., Clesceri, L. S., & Greenberg, A. E. (Eds.) (1995). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (19th ed). Washington, D.C.: American Public Health England Association, American Water Works Association, and the Water Environment Federation.
6. Fassman, E. A. (2002). Methods for evaluation of ultraurban best management practices. Doctoral dissertation, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA.
7. Fassman, E.A. (2006). Improving effectiveness and evaluation techniques of stormwater best management practices. Journal of Environmental Science and Health Part A, 41, 1247-1256. (Pubitemid 43879957)
8. Hach Company (1991). Hach DR12000 spectrophotometer handbook: Procedures manual. USA: Hach Company.
9. Jensen Precast (2001). Stormvault™: Unrivalled stormwater mitigation systems. Sparks: Jensen Precast.
10. United States Environmental Protection Agency (1986). Methodology for analysis of detention basins for control of urban runoff quality. EPA 440/5-87-001. Washington, DC: EPA Office of Water Regulations and Standards.
11. URS Greiner Woodward Clyde, Urban Drainage and Flood Control District, and Urban Water Resources Research Council of ASCE (1999). Development of performance measures: Task 3.1-technical memorandum; Determining urban stormwater best management practices removal efficiencies. Washington, DC: American Society of Civil Engineers.
12. Wanielista, M. P., & Yousef, Y. A. (1992). Stormwater management. New York: Wiley.
13. Wright Water Engineering, Inc. and CH2M Hill (2002). Testing of the Jensen Precast Stormvault - Paratransit Bus lot, Sacramento, California - 2001 monitoring report.
14. Young, G. K., Stein, S., Cole, P., Kammer, T., Graziano, F., & Bank, F. (1996). Evaluation and management of highway runoff water quality. FHWA-PD-96-032. Washington, DC: Federal Highway Administration, Office of Environment and Planning.
15. Yu, S. L., & Stanford, R. (2007). Field evaluation of a stormwater bioretention filtration system. Journal of Environmental Engineering Management, 17(1), 63-70.