|
|
|
Volumn 44, Issue 8, 2010, Pages 495-497
|
|
Comparison of intraoral 3D scanning and conventional impressions for fabrication of orthodontic retainers.
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ALGINIC ACID;
BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS;
ARTICLE;
CLINICAL TRIAL;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;
COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONE BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL;
CONTROLLED STUDY;
CROSSOVER PROCEDURE;
DENTAL CARE;
DENTAL IMPRESSION;
FEMALE;
HUMAN;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MULTICENTER STUDY;
ORTHODONTIC DEVICE;
ORTHODONTICS;
PATIENT PREFERENCE;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDY;
RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL;
SINGLE BLIND PROCEDURE;
STANDARD;
THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING;
TOOTH RADIOGRAPHY;
VIDEORECORDING;
ALGINATES;
COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGN;
CONE-BEAM COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY;
CROSS-OVER STUDIES;
DENTAL IMPRESSION MATERIALS;
DENTAL IMPRESSION TECHNIQUE;
DENTAL MODELS;
FEMALE;
HUMANS;
IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL;
JAW RELATION RECORD;
MALE;
ORTHODONTIC APPLIANCE DESIGN;
ORTHODONTIC RETAINERS;
PATIENT PREFERENCE;
PATIENT SATISFACTION;
PROSPECTIVE STUDIES;
SINGLE-BLIND METHOD;
TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;
VIDEO RECORDING;
|
|
EID: 79952109172
PISSN: 00223875
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (26)
|
|
References (0)
|
