When the public good conflicts with an apparent preference for unsustainable behaviour

Ecological Economics

Volumn 70, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 971-977

  Bullock, Craig H ^a   Collier, Marcus ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

Author keywords

Choice experiment; Contingent valuation; Cultural landscape; Peatland; Property rights

Indexed keywords

CONTINGENT VALUATION; CULTURAL LANDSCAPE; DISCRETE CHOICE ANALYSIS; ENERGY EFFICIENCY; LANDSCAPE; NATURAL RESOURCE; POLICY MAKING; POPULATION STRUCTURE; PROPERTY RIGHTS; PUBLIC GOODS; STAKEHOLDER; SUSTAINABILITY; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 79952071273     PISSN: 09218009     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2010.12.013     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Adger W.N. Social and ecological resilience: are they related?. Progress in Human Geography 2000, 24:347-364.
2. Alumäe H., Printsmann A., Palang H. Cultural and historical values in landscape planning: locals' perception. Landscape Interfaces: Cultural Heritage in Cultural Landscapes 2003, 125-145. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht. H. Palang, G. Fry (Eds.).
3. Anon Turf Cutters turn up the Heat, Roscommon Herald, Boyle 2009.
4. Aronson J., Milton S.J., Blignaut J. Restoring natural capital: definitions and rationale. Restoring Natural Capital: Science, Business, and Practice 2007, 3-16. Island Press, Washington. J. Aronson, S.J. Milton, J. Blignaut (Eds.).
5. Bateman I. Stated preference techniques. Valuing environmental preferences: theory and practice of the contingent valuation method in the US, EU, and developing countries 1999, Oxford University Press, Oxford. I. Bateman, K.G. Willis (Eds.).
6. Bateman I., Langford I. Non-users willingness to pay for a natural park: an applicaiton and critique of the Contingent Valuation Method. Regional Studies 1997, 31. 671-582.
7. Brander L.M., Florax R.J.G.M., Vermaat J.E. The empirics of wetland valuation: a comprehensive summary and a meta-analysis of the literature. Environmental and Resource Economics 2006, 33:223-250.
8. Buijs A.E., Pedroli B., Luginbuhl Y. From hiking through farmland to farming in a leisure landscape: changing social perception of the European landscape. Landscape Ecology 2006, 21:375-389.
9. Bullock C.H., Kay J. Preservation and change in the upland landscape. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management 1997, 40:20.
10. Burgess J., Clark J., Burgess C.M. Respondents' evaluations of a contingent valuation survey: a case study based on economic valuation of the Wildlife Enhancement Scheme. Pevensey Levels in East Sussex Area 1998, vol. 30:9.
11. Chilton S.M., Hutchinson W.G. Do focus groups contribute anything to the contingent valuation process?. Journal of Economic Psychology 1999, 20:19.
12. Clark J., Murdoch J. Local knowledge and the precarious extension of scientific networks: a reflection on three case studies. Sociologia Ruralis 1997, 37:38-60.
13. Collier M.J., Scott M.J. Industrially harvested peatlands and after-use potential: understanding local stakeholder narratives and landscape preferences. Landscape Research 2008, 33:21.
14. Collier M., Scott M. Conflicting rationalities, knowledge and values in scarred landscapes. Journal of Rural Studies 2009, 25:267-277.
15. Collier M.J., Scott M. Focus group discourses in a mined landscape. Land Use Policy 2010, 27:304-312.
16. Council of Europe, 2000. European Landscape Convention, in: Strasbourg (Ed.). Council of Europe, Strasbourg, p. 25.
17. de Groot W.T. From friend to enemy and onwards: an evolutionary perspective on the people-nature relationship. Visions of Nature 2006, 19-40. LIT Verlag, Berlin. R.J.G. van den Born, R.H.J. Lenders, W.T. de Groot (Eds.).
18. Déjeant-Pons M. The European Landscape Convention. Landscape Research 2006, 31:363-384.
19. Farrell C.A., Doyle G.J. Rehabilitation of industrial cutaway Atlantic blanket bog, NW Mayo, Ireland. Wetland Ecology and Management 2003, 11:21-35.
20. Feehan J., O'Donovan G. The Bogs of Ireland: An Introduction to the Natural, Cultural and Industrial Heritage of Irish Peatlands 1996, The Environment Institute/University College Dublin, Dublin.
21. Fjellstad W., Mittenzwei K., Dramstad W., Ovren E. Landscape protection as a tool ofr managing agricultural landscapes in Norway. Environmental Science and Policy 2009, 12:1144-1152.
22. Gerber J.-D., Knoepfel P., Nahrath S., Varone F. Institutional resource regimes: towards sustainability through the combination of property-rights theory and policy analysis. Ecological Economics 2009, 798-809.
23. Goodwin P. 'Hired hands' or 'local voice': understandings and experience of local participation in conservation. Transactions of British Geographers 1998, 23:481-499.
24. Gunderson, L., Holling, C.S., Peterson, G., Pritchard, L., 1997. Resilience in ecosystems, institutions and societies, in: Economic, B.I.I.f.E. (Ed.), Beijer Discussion Paper Number 92, Stockholm, Sweden.
25. Hammond R.F. The peatlands of Ireland. Soil Survey Bulletin 1981, Teagasc, Dublin.
26. Hanemann W.M. Welfare evaluations in contingent valuation experiments with discrete responses. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1984, 66:332-341.
27. Hanemann W.M., Loomis J.B., Kanninen B. Statistical efficiency of double-bounded dichotomous choice contingent valuation. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 1989, 73:1255-1263.
28. Harrison C., Burgess J. Social constructions of nature: a case study of conflicts over the development of Rainham Marshes. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1994, 19:291-310.
29. Harrison C.M., Burgess J. Social constructions of nature: a case study of conflicts over the development of Rainham Marshes. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers 1994, 19:291-310.
30. Hickey D., Gilmore T. Turf Cutters Fear EU Ban will be Extended 2008, Irish Examiner, Dublin.
31. Holden J. Peatland hydrology and carbon release: why small-scale process matters. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London Series A 2005, 363:2891-2913.
32. Holling C.S., Schindler D.W., Walker B.W., Roughgarden J Biodiversity in the functioning of ecosystems: an ecological synthesis. Biodiversity loss: economic and ecological issues 1995, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. C. Perrings, K.G. Maler, C. Folke, C.S. Holling, B.O. Jansson (Eds.).
33. Jones P. Urban regeneration's poisoned chalice: is there an impasse in (community) participation-based policy. Urban Studies 2003, 40:581-601.
34. Joosten H., Clarke D. Wise Use of Mires and Peatlands: background and principles including a framework for decision-making 2002, International Mire Conservation Group/International Peat Society, Finland.
35. Kimmel K., Mander U. Ecosystem services of peatlands: implicaitons for restoration. Progress in Physical Geography 2010, 34:491-514.
36. Knoepfel P., Nahrath S., Varone F. Institutional regimes for natural resources: an innovative theoretical framework for sustainability. Environmental Policy Analysis 2007, 455-506. Springer, Berlin. P. Knoepfel (Ed.).
37. Last K. Heritage and identity:the challenge of landscapes to the nature/culture dichotomy. Landscape as Heritage: Negotiating European Cultural Identity 2006, 9-17. European University Institute, Robert Schuman Centre for Advanced Studies, Florence. M. Sassatelli (Ed.).
38. MEA Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Ecosystems and Human Well Being: Synthesis Report 2005, Island Press, Washington.
39. Mitsch W.J., Gosselink J.G. Wetlands: Third Edition 2000, John Wiley and Sons, Chitchester. Third ed.
40. Moore P.D., Bellamy D.J. Peatlands 1974, Elek Science, London.
41. O'Dwyer E. Turf cutters tell EU to sod off, An Phoblact Dublin 2009.
42. Olwig K.R. The practice of landscape "Conventions" and the just landscape: the case of the European landscape convention. Landscape Research 2007, 32:579-594.
43. Parish F., Sirin A., Charman D., Joosten H., Minayeva T., Silvius M. Assessment on Peatlands, Biodiversity and Climate Change 2007, Global Environmental Centre/Wetlands International, Kuala Lumpur.
44. Pretty J.N. Participatory learning for sustainable agriculture. World Development 1995, 23:1247-1263.
45. Scharpf F.W. Games real actors could play: positive and negative coordination in embedded negotiations. Journal of Theoretical Politics 1994, 6:27-53.
46. Schwarz M., Thompson M. Divided We Stand: Redefining Politics, Technology and Social Choice 1990, Harvester Wheatsheaf, London.
47. Silins U., Rothwell R.L. Forest peatland drainage and subsidence affect soil water retention and transport properties in an Alberta peatland. Soil Science Society of America Journal 1998, 62:1048-1056.
48. Spash C. Ecosystems, contingent valuation and ethics: the case of wetland re-creation. Ecological Economics 2000, 34:194-215.
49. Walsh R.G., Loomis J.B., Gillman R.A. Valuing option, exstence and bequest demands for wilderness. Land Economics 1984, 60.
50. Wheeler B.D., Shaw S.C. Restoration of Damaged Peatlands: With Particular Reference to Lowland Raised Bogs Affected by Peat Extraction 1995, HMSO, London.
51. Wilson D. Carbon Fluxes in Irish Peatlands. Work Package 3.5, BOGLAND Project 2008.