Convergent validity of 3 low cost motion sensors with the ActiGraph accelerometer

Journal of Physical Activity and Health

Volumn 7, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 662-670

  McClain, James J ^a   Hart, Teresa L ^b   Getz, Renee S ^c   Tudor Locke, Catrine ^d  

^a NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN MILWAUKEE   (United States)

^c ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^d PENNINGTON BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Adult; Intensity; Objective assessment; Physical activity

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AMBULATORY MONITORING; ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COST; ECONOMICS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERGOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMAN; INSTRUMENTATION; MALE; REPRODUCIBILITY; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; ARIZONA; COSTS AND COST ANALYSIS; EQUIPMENT DESIGN; ERGOMETRY; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MONITORING, AMBULATORY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT, BIOMEDICAL;

EID: 79952067332     PISSN: 15433080     EISSN: 15435476     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1123/jpah.7.5.662     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. Troiano RP. A timely meeting: objective measurement of physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11, Suppl):S487-S489.
2. Schneider PL, Crouter SE, Bassett DR. Pedometer measures of free-living physical activity: comparison of 13 models. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(2):331-335.
3. Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Karabulut M, Bassett DR, Jr. Validity of 10 electronic pedometers for measuring steps, distance, and energy cost. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(8):1455-1460.
4. Tudor-Locke CE, Myers AM. Methodological considerations for researchers and practitioners using pedometers to measure physical (ambulatory) activity. Res Q Exerc Sport. 2001;72(1):1-12.
5. Bassett DR, Jr, Strath SJ. Use of Pedometers to Assess Physical Activity. In: Welk GJ, ed. Physical activity assessment for health-related research. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics; 2002:163-178.
6. Tudor-Locke C, Williams JE, Reis J P, Pluto D. Utility of pedometers for assessing physical activity: construct validity. Sports Med. 2004;34(5):281-291.
7. Le Masurier GC, Lee SM, Tudor-Locke C. Motion sensor accuracy under controlled and free-living conditions. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36(5):905-910.
8. Hoos MB, Plasqui G, Gerver WJ, Westerterp KR. Physical activity level measured by doubly labeled water and accelerometry in children. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2003;89(6):624-626.
9. Matthew CE. Calibration of accelerometer output for adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11, Suppl):S512- S522.
10. Freedson P, Pober D, Janz KF. Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11, Suppl):S523-S530.
11. Pate RR, Pratt M, Blair SN, et al. Physical activity and public health. A recommendation from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and the American College of Sports Medicine. JAMA. 1995;273(5):402-407.
12. Ward DS, Evenson KR, Vaughn A, Rodgers AB, Troiano RP. Accelerometer use in physical activity: best practices and research recommendations. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11, Suppl):S582-S588.
13. Richardson CR, Newton TL, Abraham JJ, Sen A, Jimbo M, Swartz AM. A meta-analysis of pedometer-based walking interventions and weight loss. Ann Fam Med. 2008;6(1):69-77.
14. Treuth MS, Sherwood NE, Butte NF, et al. Validity and reliability of activity measures in African-American girls for GEMS. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003;35(3):532-539.
15. McClain JJ, Sisson SB, Washington TL, Craig CL, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of Kenz Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers in 10-yr-old children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39(4):630-638.
16. Chen KY, Bassett DR, Jr. The technology of accelerom-etry-based activity monitors: current and future. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(11, Suppl):S490-S500.
17. Freedson PS, Melanson E, Sirard J. Calibration of the Computer Science and Applications, Inc. accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30(5):777-781.
18. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Masse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40(1):181-188.
19. Swartz AM, Strath SJ, Bassett DR, Jr, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Estimation of energy expenditure using CSA accelerometers at hip and wrist sites. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9, Suppl):S450-S456.
20. Tudor-Locke C, Sisson SB, Collova T, Lee SM, Swan PD. Pedometer-determined step count guidelines for classifying walking intensity in a young ostensibly healthy population. Can J Appl Physiol. 2005;30(6):666-676.
21. Strath SJ, Swartz AM, Bassett DR, Jr, O'Brien WL, King GA, Ainsworth BE. Evaluation of heart rate as a method for assessing moderate intensity physical activity. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2000;32(9, Suppl):S465-S470.
22. Crouter SE, Schneider PL, Bassett DR, Jr. Spring-levered versus piezo-electric pedometer accuracy in overweight and obese adults. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37(10):1673-1679.
23. McClain JJ, Craig CL, Sisson SB, Tudor-Locke C. Comparison of Lifecorder EX and ActiGraph accelerometers under free-living conditions. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2007;32(4):753-761.
24. Kumahara H, Schutz Y, Ayabe M, et al. The use of uniaxial accelerometry for the assessment of physical-activity-related energy expenditure: a validation study against whole-body indirect calorimetry. Br J Nutr. 2004;91(2):235-243.