Chest-compression-only versus standard CPR [3]

The Lancet

Volumn 377, Issue 9767, 2011, Pages 716-

  Böttiger, Bernd W ^a   Koster, Rudolph W ^b   Bossaert, Leo ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL OF COLOGNE   (Germany)

^b ACADEMIC MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^c UNIVERSITY OF ANTWERP   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASPHYXIA; ASSISTED VENTILATION; DROWNING; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; HEART ARREST; HUMAN; HYPOXEMIA; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; THORAX COMPRESSION; ARTIFICIAL VENTILATION; EMERGENCY HEALTH SERVICE; EUROPE; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); METHODOLOGY; NOTE; OUT OF HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; STANDARD; SURVIVAL RATE;

CARDIOPULMONARY RESUSCITATION; EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES; EUROPE; GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; HUMANS; META-ANALYSIS AS TOPIC; OUT-OF-HOSPITAL CARDIAC ARREST; RESPIRATION, ARTIFICIAL; SURVIVAL RATE;

EID: 79952064124     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60264-X     Document Type: Letter

References (3)

1. Hüpfl M, Selig HF, Nagele P. Chest-compression-only versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a metaanalysis. Lancet 2010; 2010; 376: 1522-24.
2. Hallstrom A, Cobb L, Johnson E, Copass M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1546-53. (Pubitemid 30340499)
3. Nolan JP, Soar J, Zideman DA, et al. European Resuscitation Council guidelines for resuscitation, section 1: executive summary. Resuscitation 2010; 81: 1219-76.