Chest-compression-only versus standard CPR

The Lancet

Volumn 377, Issue 9767, 2011, Pages 718-

  Abe, Toshikazu ^a   Tokuda, Yasuharu ^b  

^a HARVARD SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TSUKUBA   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSISTED VENTILATION; BRAIN FUNCTION; EMERGENCY TREATMENT; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LETTER; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RESUSCITATION; SOCIAL INTERACTION; SURVIVAL; THORAX COMPRESSION;

EID: 79952057459     PISSN: 01406736     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60268-7     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Hüpfl M, Selig HF, Nagele P. Chest-compression-only versus standard cardiopulmonary resuscitation: a meta-analysis. Lancet 2010; 376: 1522-24.
2. Rea A, Fahrenbruch C, Culley L, et al. CPR with chest compression alone or with rescue breathing. N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 423-33.
3. Hallstrom A, Cobb L, Johnson E, Copass M. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation by chest compression alone or with mouth-to-mouth ventilation. N Engl J Med 2000; 342: 1546-53. (Pubitemid 30340499)
4. Abe T, Tokuda Y, Ishimatsu S. Predictors for good cerebral performance among adult survivors of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest. Resuscitation 2009; 80: 431-36.
5. Abe T, Izumitani S, Sano T, Nagemine Y, Ishimatsu S, Tokuda Y. What is full recovery? Reconsider outcome of cardiopulmonary cerebral resuscitation beyond Glasgow-Pittsburgh cerebral performance categories 1. Crit Care 2009; 13 (suppl 1): 67.