The composition of thoughts

Nous

Volumn 45, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 126-166

  Heck Jr , Richard G ^a   May, Robert ^b  

^a BROWN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79952052909     PISSN: 00294624     EISSN: 14680068     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-0068.2010.00769.x     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Angelelli, I. (1967). Studies on Gottlob Frege and Traditional Philosophy. Reidel, Dordrecht.
2. Antonelli, A. and May, R. (2000). 'Frege's new science', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 41(23): 242-70.
3. Beaney, M. (2007). 'Frege's use of function-argument analysis and his introduction of truth-values as objects', Grazer Philosophische Studien 75: 93-123.
4. Bell, D. (1987). 'Thoughts', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 28: 36-50.
5. Burge, T. (2005a). 'Frege on knowing the foundation', in Burge 2005c, 317-55.
6. Dummett, M. (1981). The Interpretation of Frege's Philosophy. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
7. - (1991a). Frege: Philosophy of Mathematics. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
8. - (1991b). 'More about thoughts', in Frege and Other Philosophers. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 289-314.
9. - (1993). 'What is a theory of meaning? (I)', in The Seas of Language. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1-33.
10. Evans, G. (1985). 'Understanding demonstratives', in Collected Papers. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 291-321.
11. Fodor, J. and Lepore, E. (1992). Holism: A Shopper's Guide. Blackwells, Cambridge MA.
12. - (2002). 'Why compositionality won't go away: Reflections on Horwich's 'deflationary' theory', in The Compositionality Papers. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 43-62.
13. Frege, G. (1964). The Basic Laws of Arithmetic: Exposition of the System, ed. and tr. by M. Furth. University of California Press, Berkeley CA.
14. - (1970). Translations from the Philosophical Writings of Gottlob Frege, Geach, P. and Black, M., eds. Blackwell, Oxford.
15. - (1972). Conceptual Notation and Related Articles, Bynum, T. W., ed. Oxford University Press, New York.
16. - (1979). Posthumous Writings, Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., and Kaulbach, F., eds. tr. by P. Long and R. White. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
17. - (1984). Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic, and Philosophy, McGuiness, B., ed. Basil Blackwell, Oxford.
18. - (1997). The Frege Reader, Beaney, M., ed. Blackwell, Oxford.
19. - (Bg). 'Begriffsschrift: A formula language modeled upon that of arithmetic, for pure thought', tr. by J. van Heijenoort, in J. van Heijenoort (ed.), From Frege to Gödel: A Sourcebook in Mathematical Logic. Cambridge MA, Harvard University Press, 5-82.
20. - (Gg). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik. Georg Olms Verlagsbuchhandlung, Hildesheim.
21. - (Gl). The Foundations of Arithmetic, 2d revised edition, tr. by J. L. Austin. Northwestern University Press, Evanston IL.
22. - (PMC). Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence, Gabriel, G., Hermes, H., Kambartel, F., Thiel, C., and Veraart, A., eds., tr. by H. Kaal. University of Chicago Press, Chicago.
23. Geach, P. (1965). 'Assertion', Philosophical Review 74: 449-65.
24. - (1976). 'Critical notice of Frege: Philosophy of Language', Mind 85: 436-49.
25. Hale, B. (2001a). 'Grundlagen section 64', in The Reason's Proper Study. Oxford, Clarendon Press, 91-116.
26. - (2001b). 'A response to Potter and Smiley: Abstraction by recarving', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101: 339-58.
27. Heck, R. and May, R. (2006). 'Frege's contribution to philosophy of language', in E. Lepore and B. Smith (eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Philosophy of Language. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3-39.
28. Heck, R. G. (2002). 'Do demonstratives have senses?', Philosophers' Imprint, 2. http://www.philosophersimprint.org/002002/.
29. - (2003). 'Frege on identity and identity-statements: A reply to Thau and Caplan', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 33: 83-102.
30. - (2005). Formal arithmetic before Grundgesetze. Presented as the George S. Boolos Memorial Lecture, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, January 2005.
31. - (2007). 'Frege and semantics', Grazer Philosophische Studien 75: 27-63.
32. Hugly, P. and Sayward, C. (2000). 'Frege on identities', History and Philosophy of Logic 21: 195-205.
33. Jeshion, R. (2001). 'Frege's notion of self-evidence', Mind 110: 937-76.
34. Johnson, K. (2006). 'On the nature of reverse compositionality', Erkenntnis 64: 37-60.
35. Kaplan, D. (1989). 'Demonstratives', in J. Almog, et al. (eds.), Themes from Kaplan. New York, Oxford University Press, 481-563.
36. Kripke, S. (1980). Naming and Necessity. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA.
37. Levine, J. (2002). 'Analysis and decomposition in Frege and Russell', Philosophical Quarterly 52: 195-216.
38. Marcus, R. B. (1995). 'Modalities and intensional languages', in Modalities: Philosophical Essays. Oxford, Oxford University Press, 3-24.
39. May, R. (2001). 'Frege on identity statements', in C. Cecchetto, et al. (eds.), Semantic Interfaces: Reference, Anaphora, and Aspect. Stanford, CSLI Publications.
40. - (2006). 'Frege on indexicals', Philosophical Review 115: 487-516.
41. McDowell, J. (1977). 'On the sense and reference of a proper name', Mind 86: 159-85.
42. Pagin, P. (2003). 'Communication and strong compositionality', Journal of Philosophical Logic 32: 287-322.
43. Parsons, T. (1996). 'Fregean theories of truth and meaning', in M. Schirn (ed.), Frege: Importance and Legacy. New York, de Gruyter, 371-409.
44. Patterson, D. (2005). 'Learnability and compositionality', Mind and Langauge 20: 326-52.
45. Perry, J. (1993). 'Frege on demonstratives', in The Problem of the Essential Indexical, and Other Essays. New York, Oxford University Press, 3-32.
46. Potter, M. and Smiley, T. (2001). 'Abstraction by recarving', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 101: 327-38.
47. - (2002). 'Recarving content: Hale's final proposal', Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102: 351-4.
48. Reck, E. H. and Awodey, S. eds. (2004). Frege's Lectures on Logic: Carnap's Student Notes, 1910-1914. Open Court, Peru IL. Based upon the German text, edited by Gottfried Gabriel.
49. Ricketts, T. (2005). 'Generality, meaning, and sense in Frege', in M. Beaney and E. H. Reck (eds.), Gottlob Frege: Critical Assessments of Leading Philosophers, volume IV. London, Routledge, 13-36.
50. Robbins, P. (2005). 'The myth of reverse compositionality', Philosophical Studies 125: 251-75.
51. Rumfitt, I. (1994). 'Frege's theory of predication: An elaboration and defense, with some new applications', Philosophical Review 103: 599-637.
52. Salmon, N. (1986). Frege's Puzzle. MIT Press, Cambridge MA.
53. Shapiro, S. (2009). 'We hold these truths to be self-evident: But what do we mean by that?', Review of Symbolic Logic 2: 175-207.
54. Sluga, H. (1980). Gottlob Frege. Routledge and Kegan Paul, Boston.
55. Sundholm, G. (2001). 'Frege, August Bebel, and the return of Alsace-Lorraine: The dating of the distinction between Sinn and Bedeutung', History and Philosophy of Logic 22: 57-73.
56. Textor, M. (2009). 'A repair to Frege's theory of thoughts', Synthese 167: 105-23.
57. Thau, M. and Caplan, B. (2001). 'What's puzzling Gottlob Frege?', Canadian Journal of Philosophy 31: 159-200.
58. van Heijenoort, J. (1967). 'Logic as calculus and logic as language', Synthese 17: 324-30.
59. Vilkko, R. (1998). 'The reception of Frege's Begriffsschrift', Historia Mathematica 25: 412-22.
60. Wagner, S. (1983). 'Frege's definition of number', Notre Dame Journal of Formal Logic 24: 1-21.