Contending mediated risk messages: A grounded theory of the physician-patient discussion of a prescription medication's changing risk

Patient Education and Counseling

Volumn 83, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 14-21

  Ledford, Christy J W ^a  

^a GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Grounded theory; Physician patient communication; Prescription drug medication risk

Indexed keywords

ROSIGLITAZONE;

ARTICLE; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNICATION SKILL; DOCTOR PATIENT RELATION; DRUG INFORMATION; DRUG SAFETY; GROUNDED THEORY; INFORMATION DISSEMINATION; MASS MEDIUM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RISK COMMUNICATION;

AGED; CHRONIC DISEASE; COMMUNICATION; DIABETES MELLITUS, TYPE 2; DRUG PRESCRIPTIONS; FEMALE; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; HYPOGLYCEMIC AGENTS; MALE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; PHYSICIAN'S ROLE; PHYSICIAN-PATIENT RELATIONS; PRIMARY HEALTH CARE; RISK; THIAZOLIDINEDIONES;

EID: 79952040196     PISSN: 07383991     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2010.04.041     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Murphy S., Roberts R. " Black box" 101: how the food and drug administration evaluates, communicates, and manages drug benefit/risk. J Allergy Clin Immun 2005, 117:34-39.
2. Smith T.J. Prescription drug liability: the learned intermediary and informed consent. J Law Ethics Dent 1989, 2:11-18.
3. Tian Y., Robinson J.D. Media use and health information seeking: an empirical test of complementarity theory. Health Commun 2008, 23:184-190.
4. Slovic P., Finucane M.L., Peters E., MacGregor D.G. Risk as analysis and risk as feelings. Risk Anal 2004, 24:311-322.
5. Wahlberg A., Sjoberg L. Risk perception and the media. J Risk Res 2000, 3:31-50.
6. Griffin R.J., Neuwirth K., Dunwoody S., Giese J. Information sufficiency and risk communication. Media Psychol 2004, 6:23-61.
7. Szefler S.J., Whelan G.J., Leung D.Y.M. " Black box" warning: wake up call or overreaction?. J Allergy Clin Immun 2006, 117:26-29.
8. Edwards A., Elwyn G. How should effectiveness of risk communication to aid patients' decisions be judged?. Med Decis Making 1999, 19:428-434.
9. Stein R. Diabetes drug found to raise heart attack risk. Washington Post 2007, Sect. A: 3.
10. Rubin R. Diabetics face risk on drug choices. USA Today [Internet]. 2007 Jun 4 [cited 2007 Aug 29]. Available from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-06-05-avandia-risks_N.htm.
11. Rubin R. Glaxo: diabetes pill does not raise heart risk. USA Today [Internet]. 2007 Jun 5 [cited 2007 Aug 29]. Available from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-06-05-avandia-risks_N.htm.
12. Diabetes drug to include new warnings. USA Today [Internet]. 2007 Aug 16 [cited 2007 Sep 3]. Available from: http://www.usatoday.com/news/health/2007-08-16-42085636_x.htm.
13. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Information for healthcare professionals: rosiglitazone maleate (marketed as Avandia, Avandamet, and Avandaryl) [Internet]. 2007 Nov 19 [cited 2007 Nov 27]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/cder/drug/InfoSheets/HCP/rosiglitazone200707HCP.htm.
14. U.S. Food and Drug Administration. FDA adds boxed warning for heart-related risks to anti-diabetes drug Avandia [Internet]. 2007 Nov 14 [cited 2007 Nov 27]. Available from: http://www.fda.gov/bbs/topics/NEWS/2007/NEW01743.html.
15. Corbin J., Strauss A. Grounded theory research: procedures, canons, and evaluative criteria. Qual Sociol 1990, 13:3-21.
16. Conrad C.F. A grounded theory of academic change. Sociol Educ 1978, 51:101-112.
17. Creswell J.W. Qualitative inquiry and research design: choosing among five approaches 2007, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA. 2nd ed.
18. Ballard-Reisch D.S. A model of participative decision making for physician-patient interaction. Health Commun 1990, 2:91-104.
19. Charavel M., Bremond A., Moumjid-Ferdjaqui N., Mignotte H., Odile Carrerre M. Shared decision-making in question. Psychooncology 2001, 10:93-102.
20. Ford S., Schofield T., Hope T. What are the ingredients for a successful evidence-based choice consultation? A qualitative study. Soc Sci Med 2003, 56:589-602.
21. Epstein R.M., Alper B.S., Quill T.E. Communicating evidence for participatory decision making. J Amer Med Assoc 2004, 291:2359-2366.
22. Berland G.K., Elliot M.N., Morales L.S., Algazy J.I., Kravitz R.L., Broder M.S., et al. Health information on the Internet: accessibility, quality and readability in English and Spanish. J Amer Med Assoc 2001, 285:2612-2621.
23. Brashers D.E., Goldsmith D.J., Hsieh E. Information seeking and avoiding in health contexts. Hum Commun Res 2002, 28:258-271.
24. Baker L., Wagner T.H., Singer S., Bundorf M.K. Use of the Internet and e-mail for health care information: results from a national survey. J Amer Med Assoc 2003, 289:2400-2406.
25. Murray E., Lo B., Pollack L., Donelan K., Catania J., White M., et al. The impact of health information on the Internet on the physician-patient relationship. Arch Intern Med 2003, 163:1727-1734.
26. Nettleton S., Burrows R., O'Malley L. The mundane realities of the everyday use of the Internet for health, and their consequences for media convergence. Sociol Health Ill 2005, 27:972-992.
27. Diaz J.A., Sciamanna C.N., Evangelou E., Stamp M.J., Ferguson T. What types of Internet guidance do patients want from their physicians?. J Gen Intern Med 2005, 20:683-685.
28. Hesse B.W., Nelson D.E., Kreps G.L. Trust and sources of health information: the impact of the Internet and its implications for health care providers: finding from the first Health Information National Trends Survey. Arch Intern Med 2005, 165:2618-2624.
29. Robinson T.N., Patrick K., Eng T.R., Gustafson D. An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: a challenge to medicine in the information age [Electronic version]. J Amer Med Assoc 1998, 280:1264-1269.
30. Czaja R., Manfredi C., Price J. The determinants and consequences of information seeking among cancer patients. J Health Commun 2003, 8:529-562.
31. Helft P.R., Hlubocky F., Daugherty C.K. American oncologists' views of Internet use by cancer patients: a mail survey of American Society of Clinical Oncology members. J Clin Oncol 2003, 21:942-947.
32. Kittler A.F., Hobbs J., Volk L.A., Kreps G.L., Bates DW The Internet as a vehicle to communicate health information during a public health emergency: a survey analysis. J Med Internet Res 2004, 6. Article e8. Retrieved November 21, 2006, from http://www.jmir.org/2004/1/e8.
33. Broom A. Virtually healthy: the impact of Internet use on disease experience and the doctor-patient relationship. Qual Health Res 2005, 15:325-345.
34. Street R., Millay B. Analyzing patient participation in medical encounters. Health Commun 2001, 13:61-73.
35. Xie B., Dilts D.M., Shor M. The physician-patient relationship: the impact of patient-obtained medical information. Health Econ 2006, 15:813-833.
36. Cegala D.J., Street R.L., Clinch C.R. The impact of patient participation on physicians' information provision during a primary care medical interview. Health Commun 2007, 21:177-185.
37. Marshall R.D., Posner K., Greenhill L. Risk perception research and the black box warning for SSRIs in children. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006, 45:765.
38. Kraetschmer N., Sharpe N., Urowitz S., Deber R.B. How does trust affect patient preferences for participation in decision-making?. Health Expect 2004, 7:317-326.
39. Rains S.A. The anonymity effect: the influence of anonymity on perceptions of sources and information on health websites. J Appl Commun Res 2007, 35:197-214.
40. Robinson T.N., Patrick K., Eng T.R., Gustafson D. An evidence-based approach to interactive health communication: A challenge to medicine in the information age. J Amer Med Assoc 1998, 280:1264-1269.
41. Katz E. The two-step flow of communication: an up-to-date report of an hypothesis. Public Opin Quart 1957, 21:61-78.