Stronger inducible defences enhance persistence of intraguild prey

Journal of Animal Ecology

Volumn 79, Issue 5, 2010, Pages 993-999

  Kratina, Pavel ^a,b   Hammill, Edd ^a,c   Anholt, Bradley R ^a,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VICTORIA   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BRITISH COLUMBIA   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

^d BAMFIELD MARINE SCIENCES CENTRE   (Canada)

Author keywords

Extinction; Food web dynamics; Omnivory; Protozoa; Stability

Indexed keywords

ANTIPREDATOR DEFENSE; AQUATIC ENVIRONMENT; COMMUNITY STRUCTURE; DEFENSE BEHAVIOR; ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS; EXTINCTION; FOOD WEB; GENE EXPRESSION; INTRAGUILD PREDATION; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; LONG-TERM CHANGE; MICROBIAL COMMUNITY; NUMERICAL MODEL; OMNIVORY; PHENOTYPE; PREDATOR-PREY INTERACTION; PROTOZOAN; SPECIES OCCURRENCE; STABILIZATION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; EUPLOTES; FOOD CHAIN; PHYSIOLOGY; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATION; SPECIES EXTINCTION; TIME; TURBELLARIA;

ANIMALS; EUPLOTES; EXTINCTION, BIOLOGICAL; FOOD CHAIN; POPULATION DYNAMICS; PREDATORY BEHAVIOR; TIME FACTORS; TURBELLARIA;

EID: 79952031353     PISSN: 00218790     EISSN: 13652656     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2010.01705.x     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Abrams, P.A. (1982) Functional responses of optimal foragers. American Naturalist, 120, 382-390.
2. Abrams, P.A. (1984) Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. American Naturalist, 124, 80-96.
3. Abrams, P.A. (1992) Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptation. American Naturalist, 140, 573-600.
4. Abrams, P.A. (1999) The adaptive dynamics of consumer choice. American Naturalist, 153, 83-97.
5. Abrams, P.A. & Matsuda, H. (1997) Prey adaptation as a cause of predatorprey cycles. Evolution, 51, 1742-1750.
6. Abrams, P.A. & Walters, C.J. (1996) Invulnerable prey and the paradox of enrichment. Ecology, 77, 1125-1133.
7. Altwegg, R., Marchinko, K.B., Duquette, S.L. & Anholt, B.R. (2004) Dynamics of an inducible defence in the protist Euplotes. Archiv für Hydrobiologie, 160, 431-446.
8. Altwegg, R., Eng, M., Caspersen, S. & Anholt, B.R. (2006) Functional response and prey defence level in an experimental predator-prey system. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 8, 115-128.
9. Amarasekare, P. (2007) Trade-offs, temporal variation, and species coexistence in communities with intraguild predation. Ecology, 88, 2720-2728.
10. Arim, M. & Marquet, P.A. (2004) Intraguild predation: a widespread interaction related to species biology. Ecology Letters, 7, 557-564.
11. Briggs, C.J. & Borer, E.T. (2005) Why short-term experiments may not allow long-term predictions about intraguild predation. Ecological Applications, 15, 1111-1117.
12. Brönmark, C. & Miner, J.G. (1992) Predator-induced phenotypical change in bodymorphology in crucian carp. Science, 258, 1348-1350.
13. Burnham, K.P. & Anderson, D.R. (2002) Model Selection and Multimodel Inference: A Practical Information-Theoretic Approach. Springer-Verlag, New York, New York, USA.
14. Crawley, M.J. (2007) The R Book. JohnWiley and Sons, Chichester, UK.
15. Daugherty, M.P., Harmon, J.P. & Briggs, C.J. (2007) Trophic supplements to intraguild predation. Oikos, 116, 662-677.
16. Duquette, S.L., Altwegg, R. & Anholt, B.R. (2005) Factors affecting the expression of inducible defences in Euplotes: genotype, predator density and experience. Functional Ecology, 19, 648-655.
17. Duquette, S., Altwegg, R. & Anholt, B.R. (2007) Protozoan functional responses: effects of species, genotype, and anti-predator defences. Evolutionary Ecology Research, 9, 789-800.
18. Fleming, T. & Harrington, D. (1991) Counting processes and survival analysis. John Wiley and Sons, New York, USA.
19. Gilbert, J.J. (1966) Rotifer ecology and embryological induction. Science, 151, 1234-1237.
20. Harvell, C.D. (1990) The ecology and evolution of inducible defences. Quarterly Review of Biology, 65, 323-340.
21. Harvell, C.D. & Tollrian, R. (1999) Why inducible defences? The Ecology and Evolution of Inducible Defenses (eds R. Tollrian & C.D. Harvell), pp. 3-9. Princeton University Press, Princeton, New Jersey, USA.
22. HilleRisLambers, R., van de Koppel, J. & Herman, P.M.J. (2006) Persistence despite omnivory: benthic communities and the discrepancy between theory and observation. Oikos, 113, 23-32.
23. Holt, R.D. & Polis, G.A. (1997) A theoretical framework for intraguild predation. American Naturalist, 149, 745-764.
24. Ives, A.R. & Dobson, A.P. (1987) Antipredator behavior and the population dynamics of simple predator-prey systems. American Naturalist, 130, 431-447.
25. Janssen, A., Sabelis, M.W., Magalhaes, S., Montserrat, M. & Van der Hammen, T. (2007) Habitat structure affects intraguild predation. Ecology, 88, 2713-2719.
26. Karban, R. & Baldwin, I.T. (1997) Induced Responses to Herbivory. The University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL, USA.
27. Kimbrell, T., Holt, R.D. & Lundberg, P. (2007) The influence of vigilance on intraguild predation. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 249, 218-234.
28. Kondoh, M. (2008) Building trophic modules into a persistent food web. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105, 16631-16635.
29. Kratina, P., Vos, M. & Anholt, B.R. (2007) Species diversity modulates predation. Ecology, 88, 1917-1923.
30. Kratina, P., Vos, M., Bateman, A. & Anholt, B.R. (2009) Functional responses modified by predator density. Oecologia, 159, 425-433.
31. Krivan, V. (2000)Optimal intraguild foraging and population stability. Theoretical Population Biology, 58, 79-94.
32. Kuhlmann, H.W. & Heckmann, K. (1985) Interspecificmorphogens regulating prey-predator relationships in protozoa. Science, 227, 1347-1349.
33. Kuhlmann, H.W. & Heckmann, K. (1994) Predation risk of typical ovoid and winged morphs of Euplotes (Protozoa, Ciliophora). Hydrobiologia, 284, 219-227.
34. Kusch, J. (1995) Addaptation of inducible defence in Euplotes daidaleos (Ciliophora) to predation risk by various predators. Microbial Ecology, 30, 79-88.
35. Luttbeg, B. & Schmitz, O.J. (2000) Predator and prey models with flexible individual behavior and imperfect information. American Naturalist, 155, 669-683.
36. McCann, K., Hastings, A. & Huxel, G.R. (1998) Weak trophic interactions and the balance of nature. Nature, 395, 794-798.
37. Miner, B.G., Sultan, S.E., Morgan, S.G., Padilla, D.K. & Relyea, R.A. (2005) Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends in Ecology and Evolution, 20, 685-692.
38. Pimm, S.L. & Lawton, J.H. (1977) Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature, 268, 329-331.
39. Polis, G.A., Myers, C.A. & Holt, R.D. (1989) The ecology and evolution of intraguild predation: potential competitors that eat each other. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 20, 297-330.
40. R Development Core Team (2007) R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN3-900051-07-0,URL: http://www.R-project.org.
41. Ramos-Jiliberto, R., Mena-Lorca, J., Flores, J.D. & Morales-Alvarez, W. (2008) Role of inducible defences in the stability of a tritrophic system. Ecological Complexity, 5, 183-192.
42. van der Stap, I., Vos, M. & Mooij, W.M. (2006) Linking herbivore-induced defences to population dynamics. Freshwater Biology, 51, 424-434.
43. van der Stap, I., Vos, M., Verschoor, A.M., Helmsing, N.R. & Mooij, W.M. (2007) Induced defences in herbivores and plants differentially modulate a trophic cascade. Ecology, 88, 2474-2481.
44. van der Stap, I., Vos, M., Tollrian, R. & Mooij, W.M. (2008) Inducible defences, competition and shared predation in planktonic food chains. Oecologia, 157, 697-705.
45. Stein, J. (1973) Handbook of Phycological Methods. Culture Methods and GrowthMeasurements. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK.
46. Thompson, R.M., Hemberg, M., Starzomski, B.M. & Shurin, J.B. (2007) Trophic levels and trophic tangles: the prevalence of omnivory in real food webs. Ecology, 88, 612-617.
47. Underwood, N. (1999) The influence of plant and herbivore characteristics on the interaction between induced resistance and herbivore population dynamics. American Naturalist, 152, 282-294.
48. van Veen, F.J.F., Brandon, C.E. & Godfray, H.C.J. (2009) A positive trait-mediated indirect effect involving the natural enemies of competing herbivores. Oecologia, 160, 195-205.
49. Verschoor, A.M., Vos, M. & van der Stap, I. (2004) Inducible defences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi-and tritrophic food chains. Ecology Letters, 7, 1143-1148.
50. Vos, M. (2001) Plant-mediated indirect effects and the persistence of parasitoid-herbivore communities (vol 4, pg 38, 2001). Ecology Letters, 4, 38-45.
51. Vos, M., Kooi, B.W., DeAngelis, D.L. & Mooij, W.M. (2004a) Inducible defences and the paradox of enrichment. Oikos, 105, 471-480.
52. Vos, M., Verschoor, A.M., Kooi, B.W., Wackers, F.L., DeAngelis, D.L. & Mooij, W.M. (2004b) Inducible defences and trophic structure. Ecology, 85, 2783-2794.
53. Werner, E.E. & Anholt, B.R. (1996) Predator-induced behavioral indirect effects: consequences to competitive interactions in anuran larvae. Ecology, 77, 157-169.