The effects of tracking responses and the day of mailing on physician survey response rate: Three randomized trials

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Akl, Elie A ^a,b   Gaddam, Swarna ^a   Mustafa, Reem ^b   Wilson, Mark C ^c   Symons, Andrew ^a   Grifasi, Ann ^a   McGuigan, Denise ^a   Schünemann, Holger J ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY AT BUFFALO   (United States)

^b MCMASTER UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^c UNIVERSITY OF IOWA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; COOPERATION; FAMILY MEDICINE; GENERAL PRACTITIONER; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERNAL MEDICINE; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; META ANALYSIS (TOPIC); POSTAL MAIL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); SOCIAL ATTITUDE; SOCIAL MEDICINE; TIME; FOLLOW UP; INFORMATION PROCESSING; META ANALYSIS; METHODOLOGY; PHYSICIAN; QUESTIONNAIRE; STATISTICS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

DATA COLLECTION; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; PHYSICIANS; POSTAL SERVICE; QUESTIONNAIRES; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 79952029879     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0016942     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Aitken C, Power R, Dwyer R, (2008) A very low response rate in an on-line survey of medical practitioners. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health 32: 288-289.
2. Curtis EA, Redmond RA, (2009) Survey postal questionnaire: optimising response and dealing with non-response. Nurse Researcher 16: 76-88.
3. Field TS, Cadoret CA, Brown ML, Ford M, Greene SM, et al. (2002) Surveying physicians: do components of the "Total Design Approach" to optimizing survey response rates apply to physicians? [Review] [63 refs]. Medical Care 40: 596-605.
4. Edwards PJ, Roberts I, Clarke MJ, Diguiseppi C, Wentz R, et al. (2009) Methods to increase response to postal and electronic questionnaires. Cochrane Database Syst Rev pp. MR000008.
5. Beebe TJ, Davern ME, McAlpine DD, Call KT, Rockwood TH, (2005) Increasing response rates in a survey of Medicaid enrollees: the effect of a prepaid monetary incentive and mixed modes (mail and telephone). Medical Care 43: 411-414.
6. Collins RL, Ellickson PL, Hays RD, McCaffrey DF, (2000) Effects of incentive size and timing on response rates to a follow-up wave of a longitudinal mailed survey. Evaluation Review 24: 347-363.
7. Delnevo CD, Abatemarco DJ, Steinberg MB, (2004) Physician response rates to a mail survey by specialty and timing of incentive. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 26: 234-236.
8. Harris IA, Khoo OK, Young JM, Solomon MJ, Rae H, (2008) Lottery incentives did not improve response rate to a mailed survey: a randomized controlled trial. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61: 609-610.
9. John EM, Savitz DA, (1994) Effect of a monetary incentive on response to a mail survey. Annals of Epidemiology 4: 231-235.
10. Beebe TJ, Stoner SM, Anderson KJ, Williams AR, (2007) Selected questionnaire size and color combinations were significantly related to mailed survey response rates. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 60: 1184-1189.
11. Jepson C, Asch DA, Hershey JC, Ubel PA, (2005) In a mailed physician survey, questionnaire length had a threshold effect on response rate. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 58: 103-105.
12. Kalantar JS, Talley NJ, (1999) The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: a randomized study. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 52: 1117-1122.
13. Drummond FJ, Sharp L, Carsin AE, Kelleher T, Comber H, (2008) Questionnaire order significantly increased response to a postal survey sent to primary care physicians. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 61: 177-185.
14. Pirotta M, Gunn J, Farish S, Karabatsos G, (1999) Primer postcard improves postal survey response rates. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Public Health 23: 196-197.
15. Rikard-Bell G, Ward J, (2000) Maximizing response rates to a survey of dentists: a randomized trial. Australian Dental Journal 45: 46-48.
16. Del Valle ML, Morgenstern H, Rogstad TL, Albright C, Vickrey BG, (1997) A randomized trial of the impact of certified mail on response rate to a physician survey, and a cost-effectiveness analysis. Evaluation & the Health Professions 20: 389-406.
17. Olivarius ND, Andreason AH, (1995) Day-of-the-week effect on doctors' response to a postal questionnaire. Scand J Prim Health Care 13.
18. Pressley MM, Dunn MG, (1985) A Factor-Interactive Experimental Investigation of Inducing Response to Questionnaires Mailed to Commercial Populations. AMA EDUCATORS PROCEEDINGS pp. 356-361.
19. McColl E, Jacoby A, Thomas L, Soutter J, Bamford C, et al. (2001) Design and use of questionnaires: a review of best practice applicable to surveys of health service staff and patients. Health Technology Assessment.
20. Asch DA, (1996) Use of a coded postcard to maintain anonymity in a highly sensitive mail survey: cost, response rates, and bias. Epidemiology 7: 550-551.
21. Campbell MJ, Waters WE, (1990) Does anonymity increase response rate in postal questionnaire surveys about sensitive subjects? A randomised trial. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health 44: 75-76.
22. McDaniel S, (1981) An Investigation of respondent anonymity's effect on mailed questionnaire response rate and quality. Journal of the Market Research Society 23: 150-160.
23. McKee DO, (1992) The effect of using a questionnaire identification code and message about non-response follow-up plans on mail survey response characteristics. Market Research Society.
24. Akl E, Mustafa R, Wilson M, Symons A, Moheet A, et al. (2009) Curricula for teaching the content of clinical practice guidelines to family medicine and internal medicine residents in the US: a survey study. Implementation Science 4: 59.
25. Akl EA, Gunukula S, Mustafa R, Wilson MC, Symons A, et al. (2010) Support for and aspects of use of educational games in family medicine and internal medicine residency programs in the US: a survey. BMC Med Educ 10: 26.
26. Edwards P, Roberts I, Clarke M, DiGuiseppi C, Pratap S, et al. (2007) Methods to increase response rates to postal questionnaires.[see comment]. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews pp. MR000008.
27. Asch DA, Jedrziewski MK, Christakis NA, (1997) Response Rates to Mail Surveys Published in Medical Journals. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology 50: 1129-1136.
28. Lubsen J, Pocock SJ, (1994) Factorial trials in cardiology: pros and cons. Eur Heart J 15: 585-588.
29. McAlister FA, Straus SE, Sackett DL, Altman DG, (2003) Analysis and Reporting of Factorial Trials: A Systematic Review. JAMA 289: 2545-2553.