Correlation of clinical and MRI staging in cervical carcinoma treated with radiation therapy: A single-center experience

Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 44-51

  Engin, Gülgün ^a   Küçücük, Seden ^a   Ölmez, Hatice ^a   Haşiloǧlu, Zehra Işik ^b   Dişçi, Rian ^a   Aslay, Işik ^a  

^a ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

^b ISTANBUL UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

Magnetic resonance imaging bull; Neoplasm staging bull; Prognosis bull; Uterine cervical neoplasm

Indexed keywords

CISPLATIN; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE MEGLUMINE;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER STAGING; CANCER SURVIVAL; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HUMAN; LYMPH NODE METASTASIS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PROGNOSIS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TUMOR VOLUME; UTERINE CERVIX CARCINOMA;

ADENOCARCINOMA; ADULT; AGED; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BIOPSY, NEEDLE; CARCINOMA, SQUAMOUS CELL; COHORT STUDIES; DISEASE-FREE SURVIVAL; FEMALE; HUMANS; LYMPH NODES; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROGNOSIS; RADIOTHERAPY DOSAGE; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SURVIVAL RATE; TIME FACTORS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS;

EID: 79952017278     PISSN: 13053825     EISSN: 13053612     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.4261/1305-3825.DIR.3114-09.1     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Kupets R, Covens A. Is the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics staging system for cervical carcinoma able to predict survival in patients with cervical carcinoma? An assessment of clinimetric properties. Cancer 2001; 92:796-804.
2. Scheidler J, Hricak H, Yu KK, Subak L, Segal MR. Radiological evaluation of lymph node metastasis in patients with cervical cancer: a meta-analysis. JAMA 1997; 278:1096-1101.
3. Kim H, Kim W, Lee M, Song E, Loh JJ. Tumor volume and uterine body invasion assessed by MRI for prediction of outcome in cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. Jpn J Clin Oncol 2007; 37:858-866.
4. Kodaira T, Fuwa N, Toita T, Tachibana K, et al. Clinical evaluation using magnetic resonance imaging for patients with stage III cervical carcinoma treated by radiation alone in multicenter analysis: its usefulness and limitations in clinical practice. Am J Clin Oncol 2003; 26:574-583.
5. Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Coakley FV, et al. Early invasive cervical cancer: CT and MR imaging in preoperative evaluation- ACRIN/GOG comparative study of diagnostic performance and interobserver variability. Radiology 2007; 245:491-498.
6. Hancke K, Heilmann V, Straka P, Kreienberg R, Kurzeder C. Pretreatment staging of cervical cancer: is imaging better than palpation? Role of CT and MRI in preoperative staging of cervical cancer: single institution results for 255 patients. Ann Surg Oncol 2008; 15:2856-2861.
7. Kaur H, Silverman PM, Iyer RB, Verschraegen CF, Eifel PJ, Charnsangavej C. Diagnosis, staging, and surveillance of cervical cancer. AJR 2003; 180:1621-1631.
8. Flueckiger F, Ebner F, Poschauko H, Tamussino K, Einspieler R, Ranner G. Cervical cancer: serial MR imaging before and after primary RT- a 2 year follow-up study. Radiology 1992; 184:89-93.
9. Ebner F, Kressel HY, Mintz MC, et al. Tumor recurrence versus fibrosis in the female pelvis: differentian with MR imaging at 1.5 T. Radiology 1988; 166:333-340.
10. Lai CH, Hong JH, Hsueh S, et al. Preoperative prognostic variables and the impact of postoperative adjuvant therapy on the outcomes of stage IB or II cervical carcinoma patients with or without pelvic lymph node metastasis. Cancer 1999; 85:1537-1546.
11. Waggoner SE. Cervical cancer. Lancet 2003; 361:2217-2225.
12. Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Camel HM, Galakatos AE, Mutch D, Lockett MA. Irradiation alone or combined with surgery in stage IB, IIA, and IIB carcinoma of the uterine cervix: update of a nonrandomized comparison. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1995; 31:703-716.
13. Fagundes H, Perez CA, Grigsby PW, Lockett MA. Distant metastasis after irradiation alone in carcinoma of the uterine cervix. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 1992; 24:197-204.
14. Nicolet V, Carignan L, Bourdon F, Prosmanne O. MR imaging of cervical carcinoma: A practical staging approach. Radiographics 2000; 20:1539-1549.
15. Bipat S, Glas AS, van der Velden J, Zwinderman AH, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in staging of uterine cervical carcinoma: systematic review. Gynecol Oncol 2003; 91:59-66.
16. Hricak H, Gatsonis C, Chi DS, et al. Role of imaging in pretreatment evaluation of early invasive cervical cancer: results of the intergroup study American College of Radiology Imaging Network 6651- Gynecologic Oncology Group 183. J Clin Oncol 2005; 23:9329-9337.
17. Yen MS, Yuan CC, Wang PH, Ng HT, Twu NF, Juang CM. Parametrial tumor spreading patterns in cervix cancer patients treated by radical hysterectomy. Int J Gynecol Obstet 2003; 80:145-151.
18. Kim HJ, Kim WC. Pretreatment tumor diameter/volume and pelvic lymph node status assessed by magnetic resonance imaging for uterine cervical carcinoma treated with concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy. J Obstet Gynaecol Res 2008; 34:529-537.
19. Michel G, Morice P, Castaigne D, Leblanc M, Rey A, Duvillard P. Lymphatic spread in stage IB and II cervical carcinoma: anatomy and surgical implications. Obstet Gynecol 1998; 91:360-363.
20. Sakuragi N, Satoh C, Takeda N, et al. Incidence and distribution pattern of pelvic and paraaortic lymph node metastasis in patients with stages IB, IIA, and IIB cervical carcinoma treated with radical hysterectomy. Cancer 1999; 85:1547-1554.
21. Selman TJ, Mann C, Zamora J, Appleyard TL, Khan K. Diagnostic accuracy of tests for lymph node status in primary cervical cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ 2008; 178:855-862.
22. Sironi S, Buda A, Picchio M, et al. Lymph node metastasis in patients with clinical early-stage cervical cancer: detection with integrated FDG PET/CT. Radiology 2006; 238:272-279.
23. Sironi S, Belloni C, Taccagni G, Del Maschio A. Invasive cervical carcinoma: MR imaging after preoperative chemotherapy. Radiology 1991; 190:719-722.
24. Manfredi R, Maresca G, Smaniotto D, et al. Cervical cancer response to neoadjuvant therapy: MR imaging assessment. Radiology 1998; 209:819-824.
25. Kinkel K, Ariche M, Tardivon AA, et al. Differentiation between recurrent tumor and benign conditions after treatment of gynecologic pelvic carcinoma: value of dynamic contrast-enhanced subtraction MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 204:55-63.