Channel response in a semiarid stream to removal of tamarisk and Russian olive

Water Resources Research

Volumn 47, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Jaeger, Kristin L ^a   Wohl, Ellen ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

^b Veterinary Dentistry and Oral Surgery   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARIZONA , USA; BANK DE-STABILIZATION; CHANNEL BANKS; CHANNEL RESPONSE; CHANNEL WIDTHS; CLAY LAYERS; IN-CHANNELS; INVASIVE PLANTS; REMOVAL METHOD; RESTORATION PROJECT; SITE CONDITIONS; SITE-SPECIFIC; TEMPORAL AND SPATIAL VARIABILITY;

CATCHMENTS; STREAM FLOW;

HYDRAULICS;

CHANNEL HYDRAULICS; CHANNEL MORPHOLOGY; EVERGREEN TREE; FLOW VELOCITY; HYDROLOGICAL RESPONSE; INVASIVE SPECIES; RESTORATION ECOLOGY; SHRUB; SPATIOTEMPORAL ANALYSIS; STREAM; STREAMFLOW; THALWEG;

ARIZONA; UNITED STATES;

ELAEAGNUS ANGUSTIFOLIA; TAMARICACEAE; TAMARIX;

EID: 79952011520     PISSN: 00431397     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1029/2009WR008741     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Akaike, H. (1974), A new look at the statistical model identification, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, 19(6), 716-723.
2. Burnham, K. P., and D. R. Anderson (2004), Multimodel Inference: Understanding AIC and BIC in Model Selection, Sociol. Methods Res., 33(2), 261-304, doi:10.1177/0049124104268644.
3. Cadol, D., S. L. Rathburn, and D. J. Cooper (2011), Aerial photographic analysis of channel narrowing and vegetation expansion in Canyon de Chelly National Monument, Arizona, USA, 1935-2004, River Res. Appl., doi:10.1002/rra.1399, in press.
4. Cooke, R. U., and R. W. Reeves (1976), Arroyos and Environmental Change in the American Southwest, 213 pp., Clarendon Press, London.
5. Friedman, J., et al. (2005), Dominance of non-native riparian trees in western USA, Biol. Invasions, 7(4), 747-751, doi10.1007/s10530-004-5849-z.
6. Gaskin, J. F., and B. A. Schaal (2002), Hybrid Tamarix widespread in U.S. invasion and undetected in native Asian range, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 99(17), 11,256-11,259, doi:10.1073/pnas.132403299.
7. Graf, W. L., (1983), The arroyo problem-palaeohydrology and paleohydraulics in the short term, in Backgroud to Paleohydrology: A Perspective, edited by K. J. Gregory, pp. 279-302, John Wiley, New York.
8. Jaeger, K. L. (2009), Channel dynamics in Canyon de Chelly National Monument, AZ, with emphasis on the effect of invasive plants, Ph.D. dissertation, Colo. State Univ., Fort Collins.
9. Levine, J. M. (2000), Species diversity and biological invasions: Relating local process to community pattern, Science, 288(5467), 852-854.
10. Planty-Tabacchi, A. M., E. Tabacchi, R. J. Naiman, C. Deferrari, and H. Décamps (1996), Invasibility of species-rich communities in riparian zones, Conserv. Biol., 10(2), 598-607, doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1996. 10020598.x. (Pubitemid 126624647)
11. Pollen-Bankhead, N., A. Simon, K. Jaeger, and E. Wohl (2009), Destabilization of streambanks by removal of invasive species in Canyon de Chelly National Monument, Arizona, Geomorphology, 103(3), 363-374, doi:10.1016/j.geomorph.2008.07.004.
12. Schumm, S. A., and R. F. Hadley (1957), Arroyos and the semiarid cycle of erosion, Am. J. of Sci., 255, 161-174, doi:10.2475/ajs.255.3.161.
13. Thomas, B. E., H. W. Hjalmarson, and S. D. Waltemeyer, (1997), Methods for estimating magnitude and frequency of floods in the southwestern United States, U.S. Geol. Surv. Water Supply Pap., 2433, 196 pp.
14. Vincent, K. R., J. M. Friedman, and E. R. Griffin (2009), Erosional consequence of saltcedar control, Environ. Manage., 44(2), 218-227.
15. Vitousek, P. M., C. M. D'Antonio, L. L. Loope, M. Rejmanek, and R. West-brooks (1997), Introduced species: A significant component of humancaused global change, N. Z. J. Ecol., 21(1), 1-16.
16. Zavaleta, E., (2000), The economic value of controlling an invasive shrub, Ambio, 29(8), 462-467.