Interaction of perceptual grouping and crossmodal temporal capture in tactile apparent-motion

PLoS ONE

Volumn 6, Issue 2, 2011, Pages

  Chen, Lihan ^a,b   Shi, Zhuanghua ^b   Müller, Hermann J ^b,c  

^a Peking University   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MUNICH   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY DISCRIMINATION; AUDITORY STIMULATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSSMODAL PERCEPTION; FEMALE; HAND MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PATTERN RECOGNITION; PERCEPTION; RIGHT HANDEDNESS; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; SENSORIMOTOR INTEGRATION; STIMULUS RESPONSE; TACTILE DISCRIMINATION; TACTILE STIMULATION; TASK PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; VISUAL STIMULATION; ATTENTION; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; FINGER; PERCEPTIVE DISCRIMINATION; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; TOUCH;

ACOUSTIC STIMULATION; ADULT; ATTENTION; DISCRIMINATION (PSYCHOLOGY); FEMALE; FINGERS; HUMANS; MALE; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; MOTION PERCEPTION; PHOTIC STIMULATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; TIME PERCEPTION; TOUCH; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 79952011499     PISSN: None     EISSN: 19326203     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0017130     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Exner S, (1875) Über das Sehen von Bewegungen und die Theorie des zusammengesetzten Auges. Sitzungsberichte der Akademie der Wissenschaften in Wien, Mathematisch- Naturwissenschaftliche Klasse, Abteilung 3 72: 156-190.
2. Sekuler R, Sekuler AB, Lau R, (1997) Sound alters visual motion perception. Nature 385: 308.
3. Soto-Faraco S, Lyons J, Gazzaniga MS, Spence C, Kingstone A, (2002) The ventriloquist in motion: Illusory capture of dynamic information across sensory modalities. Cognitive Brain Research 14: 139-146.
4. Soto-Faraco S, Spence C, Kingstone A, (2004) Cross-modal dynamic capture: Congruency effects in the perception of motion across sensory modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 30: 330-345.
5. Freeman E, Driver J, (2008) Direction of Visual apparent motion driven solely by timing of a static sound. Current biology 18: 1262-1266.
6. Shi Z, Chen L, Müller HJ, (2010) Auditory temporal modulation of the visual Ternus effect: the influence of time interval. Experimental Brain Research 203: 723-735.
7. Welch RB, (1999) Meaning, attention, and the "unity assumption" in the intersensory bias of spatial and temporal perceptions. In: Aschersleben G, Bachmann T, Müsseler J, editors. Cognitive contributions to the perception of spatial and temporal events Elsevier Amsterdam pp. 371-387.
8. Welch RB, Warren DH, (1980) Immediate Perceptual Response to Intersensory Discrepancy. Psychological Bulletin 88: 638-667.
9. Bertelson P, Aschersleben G, (2003) Temporal ventriloquism: crossmodal interaction on the time dimension: 1. Evidence from auditory visual temporal order judgment. International Journal of Psychophysiology 50: 147-155.
10. Getzmann S, (2007) The effect of brief auditory stimuli on visual apparent motion. Perception 36: 1089-1103.
11. Morein-Zamir S, Soto-Faraco S, Kingstone A, (2003) Auditory capture of vision: examining temporal ventriloquism. Cognitive Brain Research 17: 154-163.
12. Vroomen J, de Gelder B, (2004) Perceptual Effects of Cross-modal Stimulation: Ventriloquism and the Freezing Phenomenon. In Handbook of mutlisensory processes, MIT Press pp. 141-150.
13. Koffka K, (1935) Principles of Gestalt psychology New York Harcourt Brace.
14. Köhler W, (1930) Gestalt psychology. London Bell.
15. Spence C, Sanabria D, Soto-Faraco S, (2007) Intersensory Gestalten and crossmodal scene perception. In The Psychology of Beauty and Kansei New Horizons of Gestalt Perception. Ed. K Noguchi (Tokyo: Nihon University College of Humanities and Sciences).
16. O'Leary A, Rhodes G, (1984) Cross-modal effects on visual and auditory object perception. Perception & Psychophysics 35: 565-569.
17. Recanzone GH, (2009) Interactions of auditory and visual stimuli in space and time. Hearing Research 258: 89-99.
18. Vroomen J, de Gelder B, (2000) Sound enhances visual perception: cross-modal effects of auditory organization on vision. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 26: 1583-1590.
19. Keetels M, Stekelenburg J, Vroomen J, (2007) Auditory grouping occurs prior to intersensory pairing: evidence from temporal ventriloquism. Experimental Brain Research 180: 449-456.
20. Bruns P, Getzmann S, (2008) Audiovisual influences on the perception of visual apparent motion: exploring the effect of a single sound. Acta Psychologica 129: 273-283.
21. Von Bekesy G, (1959) Similarities between hearing and skin sensations. Psychological Review 66: 1-22.
22. Hirsh IJ, Sherrick CEJ, (1961) Perceived order in different sense modalities. Journal of Experimental Psychology 62: 423-432.
23. Ernst MO, Banks MS, (2002) Humans integrate visual and haptic information in a statistically optimal fashion. Nature 415: 429-433.
24. Bresciani JP, Ernst MO, (2007) Signal reliability modulates auditory-tactile integration for event counting. NeuroReport 18: 1157-1161.
25. Mamassian P, Goutcher R, Temporal dynamics in bistable perception. Journal of Vision 5: 361-375.
26. Pastukhov A, Braun J, (2007) Perceptual reversals need no prompting by attention. Journal of Vision 7: 1-17.
27. Zampini M, Brown T, Shore DI, Maravita A, Röder B, (2005) Audiotactile temporal order judgments. Acta Psychologica 118: 277-291.
28. Vroomen J, Keetels M, (2010) Perception of intersensory synchrony: A tutorial review, Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics. 72: 871-884.
29. Alais D, Burr D, (2004) The ventriloquist effect results from near-optimal bimodal integration. Current Biology 14: 257-262.
30. Bresciani JP, Dammeier F, Ernst MO, (2006) Vision and touch are automatically integrated for the perception of sequences of events. Journal of Vision 6: 554-564.
31. Gepshtein S, Burge J, Ernst MO, Banks MS, (2005) The combination of vision and touch depends on spatial proximity. Journal of Vision 5: 1013-1023.
32. Slutsky DA, Recanzone GH, (2001) Temporal and spatial dependency of the ventriloquism effect. NeuroReport 12: 7-10.
33. Berman RA, Colby CL, (2002) Auditory and visual attention modulate motion processing in area MT+. Cognitive Brain Research 14: 64-74.
34. Cavanagh P, (1992) Attention-based motion perception. Science 257: 1563-1565.
35. Lu ZL, Sperling G, (1995) Attention-generated apparent motion. Nature 377: 237-239.
36. Shimojo S, Miyauchi S, Hikosaka O, (1997) Visual motion sensation yielded by non-visually driven attention. Vision Research 37: 1575-1580.
37. Scheier C, Nijhawan R, Shimojo S, (1999) Sound alters visual temporal resolution. Investigative Ophthalmology &Visual Science 40: S792.
38. Desimone R, (1998) Visual attention mediated by biased competition in extrastriate visual cortex. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 353: 1245-1255.
39. Talsma D, Senkowski D, Soto-Faraco S, Woldorff MG, (2010) The multifaceted interplay between attention and multisensory integration. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 14: 400-410.
40. Brainard DH, (1997) The Psychophysics Toolbox. Spatial Vision 10: 433-436.