GIS mapping of regional probabilistic groundwater potential in the area of Pohang City, Korea

Journal of Hydrology

Volumn 399, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 158-172

  Oh, Hyun Joo ^a   Kim, Yong Sung ^b,c   Choi, Jong Kuk ^d   Park, Eungyu ^b   Lee, Saro ^a  

^a Korea Institute of Geosceince and Mineral Resources   (South Korea)

^b Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

^c Yooshin Engineering Corporation   (South Korea)

^d Korea Research Institute of Ships and Ocean Engineering   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Frequency ratio; GIS; Groundwater exploration; Groundwater potential; Korea; Sensitivity analysis

Indexed keywords

COMBINED EFFECT; FREQUENCY RATIOS; GIS; GIS MAPPING; GROUND ELEVATION; GROUNDWATER EXPLORATION; GROUNDWATER MANAGEMENT; HYDROLOGICAL FACTORS; KOREA; POTENTIAL MAP; PROBABILITY MODELS; REGIONAL GROUNDWATER; SOIL DATA; SOIL TEXTURES; SPATIAL DATABASE; SPECIFIC CAPACITIES; WELL LOCATION;

GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; GROUNDWATER; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SOILS; TEXTURES; WATER MANAGEMENT;

GROUNDWATER RESOURCES;

GIS; GROUNDWATER RESOURCE; HYDROLOGICAL MODELING; MAPPING METHOD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; TOPOGRAPHY;

NORTH KYONGSANG; POHANG; SOUTH KOREA;

EID: 79952009171     PISSN: 00221694     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.12.027     Document Type: Article

References (60)

1. Adinarayana J., Krishna N.R. Integration of multi-seasonal remotely-sensed images for improved landuse classification of a hilly watershed using geographical information systems. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1996, 17:1679-1688.
2. Beven K.J., Kirkby M.J. A physically based, variable contributing area model of basin hydrology. Hydrol. Sci. Bull. 1979, 24:43-69.
3. Bonham-Carter G.F. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists: Modeling with GIS 1994, Pergamon Press, Ontario.
4. Carranza E.J.M., Hale M. Evidential belief functions for data-driven geologically-constrained predictive mapping of gold potential, Baguio district, Philippines. Ore Geol. Rev. 2002, 22:117-132.
5. Chenini I., Ben Mammou A. Groundwater recharge study in arid region: an approach using GIS techniques and numerical modeling. Comput. Geosci. 2010, 36:801-817.
6. Chenini I., Mammou A.B., May M.E. Groundwater recharge zone mapping using GIS-based multi-criteria analysis: a case study in Central Tunisia (Maknassy Basin). Water Resour. Manage. 2010, 24:921-939.
7. Chowdhury A., Jha M.K., Chowdary V.M., Mal B.C. Integrated remote sensing and GIS-based approach for assessing groundwater potential in West Medinipur district, West Bengal, India. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 30:231-250.
8. Corsini A., Cervi F., Ronchetti F. Weight of evidence and artificial neural networks for potential groundwater spring mapping: an application to the Mt. Modino area (Northern Apennines, Italy). Geomorphology 2009, 111:79-87.
9. Faust N.L., Anderson W.H., Star J.L. Geographic information systems and remote sensing future computing environment. Photogramm. Eng. Remote Sens. 1991, 57:655-668.
10. Ghayoumian J., Mohseni Saravi M., Feiznia S., Nouri B., Malekian A. Application of GIS techniques to determine areas most suitable for artificial groundwater recharge in a coastal aquifer in southern Iran. J. Asian Earth Sci. 2007, 30:364-374.
11. Goodchild M.F. The state of GIS for environmental problem-solving. Environmental Modeling with GIS 1993, 8-15. Oxford University Press. M.F. Goodchild, B.O. Parks, L.T. Steyaert (Eds.).
12. Greenbaum, D., 1992. Structural Influences on the Occurrence of Groundwater in SE Zimbabwe, vol. 66. Geological Society, London, Special Publications, pp. 77-85.
13. Gupta M., Srivastava P.K. Integrating GIS and remote sensing for identification of groundwater potential zones in the hilly terrain of Pavagarh, Gujarat, India. Water Int. 2010, 35:233-245.
14. Hinton J.C. GIS and remote sensing integration for environmental applications. Int. J. Geogr. Inform. Syst. 1996, 10:877-890.
15. Hwang J.H., Kim D.H., Cho D.L., Song K.-Y. Explanatory Note of the Andong Sheet 1996, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon.
16. Israil M., Al-hadithi M., Singhal D.C. Application of a resistivity survey and geographical information system (GIS) analysis for hydrogeological zoning of a piedmont area, Himalayan foothill region, India. Hydrogeol. J. 2006, 14:753-759.
17. Jaiswal R.K., Mukherjee S., Krishnamurthy J., Saxena R. Role of remote sensing and GIS techniques for generation of groundwater prospect zones towards rural development - an approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2003, 24:993-1008.
18. Jha M.K., Chowdhury A., Chowdary V.M., Peiffer S. Groundwater management and development by integrated remote sensing and geographic information systems: prospects and constraints. Water Resour. Manage. 2007, 21:427-467.
19. Kane W.F., Peters D.C., Speirer R.A. Remote sensing in investigation of engineered underground structures. J. Geotech. Eng. 1996, 122:674-681.
20. Kim D.H., Hwang J.H., Park K.H., Song K.-Y. Explanatory Note of the Busan Sheet 1998, Korea Institute of Geoscience and Mineral Resources, Daejeon.
21. Kim K.-D., Lee S., Oh H.-J., Choi J.-K., Won J.-S. Assessment of ground subsidence hazard near an abandoned underground coal mine using GIS. Environ. Geol. 2006, 50:1183-1191.
22. Koike K., Nagano S., Kawaba K. Construction and analysis of interpreted fracture planes through combination of satellite-image derived lineaments and digital elevation model data. Comput. Geosci. 1998, 24:573-583.
23. Kumar M.G., Bali R., Agarwal A.K. Integration of remote sensing and electrical sounding data for hydrogeological exploration - a case study of Bakhar watershed, India. Hydrolog. Sci. J. 2009, 54:949-960.
24. Lee S., Choi U. Development of GIS-based geological hazard information system and its application for landslide analysis in Korea. Geosci. J. 2003, 7:243-252.
25. Lee S., Dan N. Probabilistic landslide susceptibility mapping in the Lai Chau province of Vietnam: focus on the relationship between tectonic fractures and landslides. Environ. Geol. 2005, 48:778-787.
26. Lee S., Oh H.J., Kim K.D. Statistical spatial modeling of ground subsidence hazard near an abandoned underground coal mine. Disaster Adv. 2010, 3:11-23.
27. Leopold L.B., Wolman M.G., Miller J.P. Fluvial Processes in Geomorphology 1964, W.H. Freeman and Company, San Francisco, California.
28. Mabee S.B., Hardcastle K.C., Wise D.U. A method of collecting and analyzing lineaments for regional-scale fractured-bedrock aquifer studies. Ground Water 1994, 32:884-894.
29. Madrucci V., Taioli F., de Araújo C.C. Groundwater favorability map using GIS multicriteria data analysis on crystalline terrain, São Paulo State, Brazil. J. Hydrol. 2008, 357:153-173.
30. Ministry for Food, Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries (MFAFF), 1985-2005. Rural Groundwater Survey Report. MIFAFF.
31. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), 1995. National Groundwater Monitoring Network Construction Report. MLTM.
32. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), 1998. National Groundwater Monitoring Network Construction Report. MLTM.
33. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), 2001. National Groundwater Monitoring Network Construction Report. MLTM.
34. Ministry of Land, Transport and Maritime Affairs (MLTM), 2003. Report of Groundwater in Pohang Area. MLTM.
35. Mondal M.S., Pandey A.C., Garg R.D. Groundwater prospects evaluation based on hydrogeomorphological mapping using high resolution satellite images: a case study in Uttarakhand. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2008, 36:69-76.
36. Mukherjee S. Targetting saline aquifer by remote sensing and geophysical methods in a part of Hamirpur-Kanpur, India. Hydrol. J. 1996, 19:1867-1884.
37. Murthy K.S.R. Ground water potential in a semi-arid region of Andhra Pradesh - a geographical information system approach. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2000, 21:1867-1884.
38. Murthy K.S.R., Mamo A.G. Multi-criteria decision evaluation in groundwater zones identification in Moyale-Teltele subbasin, South Ethiopia. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2009, 30:2729-2740.
39. Nagarajan M., Singh S. Assessment of groundwater potential zones using GIS technique. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2009, 37:69-77.
40. Oh H.J., Lee S., Chotikasathien W., Kim C.H., Kwon J.H. Predictive landslide susceptibility mapping using spatial information in the Pechabun area of Thailand. Environ. Geol. 2009, 57:641-651.
41. Oh H.-J., Lee S., Soedradjat G. Quantitative landslide susceptibility mapping at Pemalang area, Indonesia. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 60:1317-1328.
42. O'Leary D.W., Friedman J.D., Pohn H.A. Lineament, linear, lineation; some proposed new standards for old terms. Geol. Soc. Am. Bull. 1976, 87:1463-1469.
43. Pradhan B. Groundwater potential zonation for basaltic watersheds using satellite remote sensing data and GIS techniques. Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. 2009, 1:120-129.
44. Pradhan B., Lee S. Delineation of landslide hazard areas on Penang Island, Malaysia, by using frequency ratio, logistic regression, and artificial neural network models. Environ. Earth Sci. 2010, 60:1037-1054.
45. Pradhan B., Lee S., Buchroithner M.F. Remote sensing and GIS-based landslide susceptibility analysis and its cross-validation in three test areas using a frequency ratio model. Photogrammetrie Fernerkundung Geoinformation 2010, 1:17-32.
46. Prasad R.K., Mondal N.C., Banerjee P., Nandakumar M.V., Singh V.S. Deciphering potential groundwater zone in hard rock through the application of GIS. Environ. Geol. 2008, 55:467-475.
47. Ranganai R.T., Ebinger C.J. Aeromagnetic and landsat TM structural interpretation for identifying regional groundwater exploration targets, south-central Zimbabwe Craton. J. Appl. Geophys. 2008, 65:73-83.
48. Reid, L.M., 1993. Research and cumulative watershed effects. U.S.D.A. Forest Service General Technical Report PSW-GTR-141, Albany, California.
49. Roy A.K. Hydromorphogeological Mapping for Ground Water Targeting and Development in Dehradun valley 1996, Surya Publications, Dehradun.
50. Saha D., Dhar Y.R., Vittala S.S. Delineation of groundwater development potential zones in parts of marginal Ganga Alluvial Plain in South Bihar, Eastern India. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2010, 165:179-191.
51. Saraf A.K., Choudhury P.R. Integrated remote sensing and GIS for groundwater exploration and identification of artificial recharge sites. Int. J. Remote Sens. 1998, 19:1825-1841.
52. Saraf A.K., Choudhury P.R., Roy B., Sarma B., Vijay S., Choudhury S. GIS based surface hydrological modelling in identification of groundwater recharge zones. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2004, 25:5759-5770.
53. Sarkar B., Deota B., Raju P., Jugran D. A geographic information system approach to evaluation of groundwater potentiality of Shamri micro-watershed in the Shimla Taluk, Himachal Pradesh. J. Indian Soc. Remote Sens. 2001, 29:151-164.
54. Solomon S., Quiel F. Groundwater study using remote sensing and geographic information systems (GIS) in the central highlands of Eritrea. Hydrogeol. J. 2006, 14:729-741.
55. Srivastava P.K., Bhattacharya A.K. Groundwater assessment through an integrated approach using remote sensing, GIS and resistivity techniques: a case study from a hard rock terrain. Int. J. Remote Sens. 2006, 27:4599-4620.
56. Stafford D.B. Civil Engineering Applications of Remote Sensing and Geographic Information Systems 1991, ASCE, New York.
57. Tam V.T., De Smedt F., Batelaan O., Dassargues A. Study on the relationship between lineaments and borehole specific capacity in a fractured and karstified limestone area in Vietnam. Hydrogeol. J. 2004, 12:662-673.
58. Teeuw R.M. Groundwater exploration using remote sensing and a low-cost geographical information system. Hydrogeol. J. 1995, 3:21-30.
59. Thomas G.B. Calculus and Analytic Geometry: Part Two Vectors and Functions of Several Variables 1968, Addison-Wesley Publishing, Reading, MA.
60. Yeh H.F., Lee C.H., Hsu K.C., Chang P.H. GIS for the assessment of the groundwater recharge potential zone. Environ. Geol. 2009, 58:185-195.