DiNAMIC: A method to identify recurrent DNA copy number aberrations in tumors

Bioinformatics

Volumn 27, Issue 5, 2011, Pages 678-685

  Walter, Vonn ^a,b   Nobel, Andrew B ^a,b,c   Wright, Fred A ^a,b  

^a IL   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^c University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DNA;

ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; COMPUTER PROGRAM; COPY NUMBER VARIATION; DNA SEQUENCE; GENETICS; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM;

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; DNA COPY NUMBER VARIATIONS; DNA, NEOPLASM; HUMANS; NEOPLASMS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SOFTWARE;

EID: 79951998794     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btq717     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Albertson,D.G. et al. (2003) Chromosome aberrations in cancer. Nat. Genet., 34, 369-376.
2. Anderson,T.W. (1960) Some stochastic process methods for intelligence test scores. In Arrow,K.J. et al. (eds), Mathematical Methods in the Social Sciences, 1959: Proceedings from the First Stanford Symposium. Stanford Mathematical Studies in the Social Sciences: IV. Stanford University Press, Stanford, CA, pp. 205-220.
3. Baross,A. et al. (2007) Assessment of algorithms for high throughput detection of genomic copy number variation in oligonucleotide microarray data. BMC Bioinformatics, 8, 368.
4. Benjamini,Y. and Yekutieli,D. (2001) The control of the false discovery rate in multiple testing under dependency. Ann. Stat., 29, 1165-1188.
5. Beroukhim,R. et al. (2007) Assessing the significance of chromosomal aberrations in cancer: methodology and application to glioma, Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 104, 20007-20012.
6. Carlson,S. et al. (1998) Expression of SET, an inhibitor of protein phosphatase 2A, in renal development and Wilms tumor. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol., 9, 1873-1880.
7. Coe,B.P. et al. (2007) Resolving the resolution of array CGH. Genomics, 89, 647-653.
8. Davies,J.J. et al. (2005) Array CGH technologies and their applications to cancer genomes. Chromosome Res., 13, 237-248.
9. Diskin,S. et al. (2006) STAC: amethod for testing the significance of DNAcopy number aberrations across multiple array-CGH experiments. Genome Res., 16, 1149-1158.
10. Guttman,M. et al. (2007) Assessing the significance of conserved genomic aberrations using high resolution genomic microarrays. PLoS Genet., 3, e143.
11. Harada,T. et al. (2008) Genome-wide DNA copy number analysis in pancreatic cancer using high-density single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Oncogene, 27, 1951-1960.
12. Heimberger,A.M. et al. (2005) The natural history of EGFR and EGFRvIII in glioblastoma patients. J. Trans. Med., 3, 38.
13. Hupe,P. et al. (2004) Analysis of array CGH data: from signal ratio to gain and loss of DNA regions. Bioinformatics, 20, 3413-3422.
14. Itsara,A. et al. (2009) Population analysis of large copy number variants and hotspots of human genetic disease. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 84, 148-161.
15. Jackson,M.A. et al. (2006) Genetic alterations in cancer knowledge system: analysis of gene mutations in mouse and human liver and lung tumors. Toxicol. Sci., 90, 400-418.
16. Kent,W.J. et al. (2002) The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res., 12, 996-1006.
17. Klijn,C. et al. (2008) Identification of cancer genes using a statistical framework for multiexperiment analysis of nondiscretized array CGH data. Nucleic Acids Res., 36, e13.
18. Knudsen,A. (1971) Mutations and cancer: a statistical study of retinoblastoma. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 78, 820-823.
19. Komura,D. et al. (2006) Genome-wide detection of human copy number variations using high-density DNA oligonucleotide arrays. Genome Res., 16, 1575-1584.
20. Kotliarov,Y. et al. (2006) High-resolution global genomic survey of 178 gliomas reveals novel regions of copy number alteration and allelic imbalances. Cancer Res., 66, 9428-9436.
21. Marioni,J. et al. (2007) Breaking the waves: improved detection of copy number variation from microarray-based comparative genomic hybridization. Genome Biol., 8, R228.
22. Miller,B.J. et al. (2003) Pooled analysis of loss of heterozygosity in breast cancer: a genome scan provides evidence for multiple tumor suppressors and identifies novel candidate regions. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 73, 748-767.
23. Mitelman,F. et al. (eds) (2010) Mitelman Database of chromosome aberrations and gene fusions in cancer. Available at http://cgap.nci.nih.gov/Chromosomes/Mitelman (last accessed date January 4, 2011).
24. Myllykangas,S. and Knuutila,S. (2006) Manifestation, mechanisms and mysteries of gene amplifications. Cancer Lett., 232, 79-89.
25. Natrajan,R. et al. (2006) Array CGH profiling of favourable histology Wilms tumours reveals novel gains and losses associated with relapse. J. Pathol., 210, 49-58.
26. Newton,M. et al. (1998) On the statistical analysis of allelic loss data. Stat. Med., 17, 1425-1445.
27. Olshen,A. et al. (2004) Circular binary segmentation for the analysis of array-based DNA copy number data. Biostatistics, 5, 557-572.
28. Pruim,R.J. et al. (2010) LocusZoom: regional visualization of genome-wide association scan results. Bioinformatics, 26, 2336-2337.
29. Rahman,N. et al. (1996) Evidence for a familialWilms' tumour gene (FWT1) on 17q12-21. Nat. Genet., 13, 461-463.
30. Redon,R. et al. (2006) Global variation in copy number in the human genome. Nature, 444, 444-454.
31. Rueda,O. and Diaz-Uriarte,R. (2008) Finding recurrent regions of copy number variation: a review. COBRA Preprint Series: Paper 42. Available at http://biostats.bepress.com/cobra/ps/art42 (last accessed date January 4, 2011).
32. Shah,S. (2008) Computational methods for identification of recurrent copy number alteration patterns by array CGH. Cytogenet. Genome Res., 123, 343-351.
33. Simes,R.J. (1986) An improved Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika, 73, 751-754.
34. Sterrett,A. and Wright,F.A. (2007) Inferring the location of tumor suppressor genes by modeling the frequency of allelic loss. Biometrics, 63, 33-40.
35. Stratchan,T. and Read,A.P. (1999) Human Molecular Genetics, 2nd edn. Wiley-Liss Publishing, New York, NY.
36. Sun,W. et al. (2009) Integrated study of copy number states and genotype calls using high-density SNP arrays. Nucleic Acids Res., 37, 5365-5377.
37. van de Wiel,M. and van Wieringen,W. (2007) CGHregions: dimension reduction for array CGH data with minimal information loss. Cancer Res., 3, 55-63.
38. van de Wiel et al. (2009) Smoothing waves in array CCH tumor profiles. Bioinformatics, 25, 1099-1104.
39. Venkatraman,E. and Olshen,A. (2007) A faster circular binary segmentation algorithm for the analysis of aCGH data. Bioinformatics, 23, 657-663.
40. Westfall,P. and Young,S. (1993) Resampling-based Multiple Testing. Wiley-Interscience. New York.
41. Zhao,X. et al. (2004) An integrated view of copy number and allelic alterations in the cancer genome using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays. Cancer Res., 64, 3060-3071.