What criteria do faculty use when rating students as potential house officers?

Medical Teacher

Volumn 31, Issue 9, 2009, Pages

  Hoffman, Kimberly ^a   Hosokawa, Michael ^a   Donaldson, Joe ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; CLASSIFICATION; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CLINICAL EDUCATION; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; HUMAN; LEADERSHIP; MEDICAL EDUCATION; MEDICAL SCHOOL; MEDICAL STUDENT; METHODOLOGY; STANDARD; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES;

CLINICAL CLERKSHIP; CLINICAL COMPETENCE; CURRICULUM; EDUCATION, MEDICAL, GRADUATE; EDUCATIONAL MEASUREMENT; EDUCATIONAL STATUS; FACULTY, MEDICAL; HEALTH KNOWLEDGE, ATTITUDES, PRACTICE; HUMANS; INTERNSHIP AND RESIDENCY; LEADERSHIP; STATISTICS AS TOPIC; STUDENTS, MEDICAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 79951972153     PISSN: 0142159X     EISSN: 1466187X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01421590802650100     Document Type: Short Survey

References (15)

1. Cohen J. 1988. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd ed. Hillside, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.
2. Eisner E. 1976. Educational connoisseurship and criticism: Their forms and functions in educational evaluation. J Aes Educ 10:135-150.
3. Engel GL. 1997. From biomedical to bio-psychosocial: Being scientific in the human domain. Psychosomatic 38:521-528. (Pubitemid 27528334)
4. Engel GL. 1980. The clinical application of the bio-psychosocial model. Am J Psychiatry 137:535-544.
5. Engel GL. 1977. The need for a new medical model: A challenge for biomedicine. Science 196:129-136. (Pubitemid 8067676)
6. Fine PL, Hayward RA. 1995. Do the criteria of resident selection committees predict residents' performance? Acad Med 70(9):834-838.
7. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. 2001. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
8. Institute of Medicine of the National Academies. 2004. Improving medical education: Enhancing the behavioral and social science content of medical school curricula. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
9. Kassebaum DG, Eaglen RH. 1999. Shortcomings in the evaluation of students' clinical skills and behaviors in medical school. Acad Med 74(7):842-849.
10. Kaufman A, Mennin S, Waterman R. 1989. The New Mexico experiment: Educational innovation and institutional change. Acad Med 64(6): 285-294. (Pubitemid 19158508)
11. Krippendorf K. 2003. Content analysis: An introduction to its methodology. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
12. Miles MB, Huberman M. 1994. An expanded source book. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
13. Stern D. 2006. Measuring medical professionalism. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Stewart M, Belle-Brown J, Weston W, McWhinney I, McWilliam C, Freeman T. 1995. Patient-centered medicine transforming the clinical method. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
15. Yin RK. 1994. Case study research design and methods. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.