The demand of Euromillions lottery tickets: AN international comparison;La demande de grilles d' Euromillions: Une comparaison internationale

Revue Economique

Volumn 62, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 29-56

  Roger, Patrick ^a  

^a Ecole de Management de Strasbourg   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951938489     PISSN: 00352764     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3917/reco.621.0029     Document Type: Review

References (36)

1. BEENSTOCK M. et HAITOVSKY Y. [2001], « Lottomania and other Anomalies in the Market for Lotto », Journal of Economic Psychology, 22, p. 721-744.
2. CLOTFELTER C. T. et COOK P. J. [1990], « On the Economics of State Lotteries », Journal of Economic Perspectives, 4 (4), p. 105-119.
3. CONLISK J. [1993], « The Utility of Gambling», Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 6, p. 255-275.
4. COOK P.J. et CLOTFELTER C. T. [1993], « The Peculiar Scales Economies of Lotto », American Economic Review, 83 (3), p. 634-643.
5. DONKERS B., MELENBERG B. et VAN SOEST A. [2001], « Estimating Risk Attitudes using Lotteries: A Large Sample Approach », The Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22 (2), p. 165-195.
6. FARRELL L., MORGENROTH E. et WALKER I. [1999], «A time-series Analysis of UK Lottery Sales: Long and Short Run Price Elasticities », Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, p. 513-526.
7. FARRELL L., HARTLEY R., LANOT G. et WALKER I. [2000], «The demand for Lotto: the role of conscious selection », Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 18 (2), p. 228-241.
8. FARRELL L. et WALKER I. [1999], « The Welfare Effects of Lotto: Evidence from the UK », Journal of Public Economics, 72, p. 99-120.
9. FORREST D., GULLEY D. et SIMMONS R. [2000], « Elasticity of Demand for UK National Lottery Tickets », National Tax Journal, 53, p. 853-863.
10. FORREST D., GULLEY D. et SIMMONS R. [2008], «The Relationship between Betting and Lottery Play», Economic Inquiry, forthcoming, DOI: 10.1111/J.14657295.2008.00123.x.
11. FORREST D. et MCHALE I. [2007], « The Relationship Between a National and a Multistate Lotto Game », The Journal of Gambling Business and Economics, 1 (3), p. 207-216.
12. FORREST D., SIMMONS R. et CHESTERS N. [2002], « Buying a Dream: Alternative Models of Demand for Lotto », Economic Inquiry, 40 (3), p. 485-496.
13. FRIEDMAN M. et SAVAGE L. [1948], «Utility Analysis of Choices Involving Risk», Journal of Political Economy, 56 (4), p. 279-304.
14. GARRETT T. A. [2001], « An International Comparison and Analysis of Lotteries and the Distribution of Lottery Expenditures », International Review of Applied Economics, 15 (2), p. 213-227.
15. GARVIA R. [2007], «Syndication, Institutionalization, and Lottery Play», American Journal of Sociology, 113 (3), p. 603-652.
16. GERONIKOLAOU G. et PAPACHRISTOU G.A. [2007], « On the Demand for Lotteries in Greece », International Journal of Business and Economics, 6 (3), p. 255-259.
17. GROTE K. et MATHESON V. [2007], « Examining the "Halo Effect" in Lotto Games », Applied Economic Letters, 14 (4-6), p. 307-310.
18. GULLEY D. O. et SCOTT F. A. [1993], « The Demand for Wagering on State-Operated Lotto Games », National Tax Journal, 45 (1), p. 13-22.
19. KAHNEMAN D. et TVERSKY A. [1979], « Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk », Econometrica, 47, p. 313-327.
20. KEARNEY M. S. [2005], « State Lotteries and Consumer Behavior », Journal of Public Economics, 89, p. 2269-2299.
21. MARKOWITZ H. [1952], « The Utility of Wealth », Journal of Political Economy, 60 (2), p. 151-158.
22. MASON P.M., STEAGALL J.W. et FABRITIUS M.M. [1997], « The Elasticity of Demand for Lotto Tickets and the Corresponding Welfare Effects », Public Finance Review, 25, p. 474-490.
23. MATHESON V.A. et GROTE K.R. [2004], « Lotto fever: do lottery players act rationally around large jackpots? », Economics Letters, 83, p. 233-237.
24. NJPC (NATIONAL JOINT PITCH COUNCIL) [2006], Annual Report and Accounts 2005, available at http://www.njpc-ltd.co.Royaume Uni/data/documents/60-NJPC- 056.pdf.
25. OSTER E. [2004], « Are All Lotteries Regressive? Evidence from the Powerball », National Tax Journal, 57, p. 179-187.
26. PFIFFELMANN M. [2010], « Solving the St. Petersburg Paradox in cumulative prospect theory: the right amount of probability weighting », Theory and Decision, forthcoming, DOI 10.1007/s11238-009-9191-x.
27. PURFIELD C. et WALDRON P. [1999], « Gambling on Lotto Numbers: Testing for substitutability or Complementarity Using Semi-Weekly Turnover Data », Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61 (4), p. 527-544.
28. QUIGGIN J.C. [1982], « A Theory of Anticipated Utility », Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 3 (4), p. 323-343.
29. QUIGGIN J.C. [1991], « On the Optimal Design of Lotteries », Economica, 58, p. 1-16.
30. ROGER P. et BROIHANNE M.H. [2007], « Efficiency of Betting Markets and Rationality of Players: Evidence from the French 6/49 Lotto », Journal of Applied Statistics, 34 (6), p. 645-662.
31. SCOTT F.A. et GULLEY D.O. [1995], « Rationality and Efficiency in Lotto Markets », Economic Inquiry, 33 (2), p. 175-188.
32. THALER R. et JOHNSON E.J. [1990], « Gambling with the House Money and Trying to Break Even: The Effects of Prior Outcomes on Risky Choice », Management Science, 36 (6), p. 643-660.
33. TVERSKY A. et KAHNEMAN D. [1992], «Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representation of Uncertainty », Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5 (4), p. 297-323.
34. WALKER I. [1998], «The Economic Analysis of Lotteries », Economic Policy, 13 (27), p. 359-392.
35. WALKER Y. et YOUNG J. [2001], « An Economist's Guide to Lottery Design», The Economic Journal, 111, p. 700-722.
36. WANG J. H., TZENGB L. Y. et TIENC J. [2006], « Willingness to pay and the demand for lotto », Applied Economics, 38, p. 1207-1216.