Self-solicited feedback: Effects of hourly pay and individual monetary incentive pay

Journal of Organizational Behavior Management

Volumn 31, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 3-20

  Slowiak, Julie M ^a   Dickinson, Alyce M ^a   Huitema, Bradley E ^a  

^a WESTERN MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Hourly pay; Incentive pay; Self solicited feedback

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951889885     PISSN: 01608061     EISSN: 15408604     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01608061.2011.541816     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alvero, A. M., Bucklin, B. R., & Austin, J. (2001). An objective review of the effectiveness and essential characteristics of performance feedback in organizational settings. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 21, 3-29.
2. Balcazar, F. E., Hopkins, B., & Suarez, Y. (1985/86). A critical objective review of performance feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7, 65-89.
3. Bucklin, B. R. (2000). The supplemental effects of feedback on productivity under individual monetary incentives. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Western Michigan University, Kalamazoo.
4. Bucklin, B. R., McGee, H. M., & Dickinson, A. M. (2003). The effects of individual monetary incentives with and without feedback. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 23, 65-94.
5. Dinsmoor, J. A., Browne, M. P., & Lawrence, C. E. (1972). A test of the negative discriminative stimulus as a reinforcer of observing. Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 18, 79-85.
6. Duncan, P. K., & Bruwelheide, L. R. (1985/86). Feedback: Use and possible behavioral functions. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 7, 91-114.
7. Earley, P. C. (1988). Computer-generated performance feedback in the magazinesubscription industry. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 41, 50-64.
8. Hwang H., & Dickinson, A. M. (2007, May). The relative effects of individual and social comparison feedback when individuals earn monetary incentives. Presented at the annual conference of the Association for Behavior Analysis, San Diego, CA.
9. Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. (1979). Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 64, 349-371.
10. Johnson, D. A., Dickinson, A. M., & Huitema, B. E. (2008). The effects of objective feedback when individuals receive fixed and individual incentive pay. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20, 53-74.
11. Kluger, A. N., & Adler, S. (1993). Person-versus computer-mediated feedback. Computers in Human Behavior, 9, 1-16.
12. Mallo, J., Nordstrom, C. R., Bartels, L. K., & Traxler, A. (2007). Electronic performance monitoring: The effect of age and task difficulty. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 20, 49-64.
13. Matthews, G. A., & Dickinson, A. M. (2000). Effects of alternative activities on productivity under different percentages of incentive pay. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 20, 3-27.
14. Mawhinney, T. C. (1975). Operant terms and concepts in the description of individual work behavior: Some problems of interpretation, application and evaluation. Journal of Applied Psychology, 60, 704-712.
15. Mawhinney, T. C., & Mawhinney, R. R. (1982). Operant terms and concepts applied to industry. In R. M. O'Brien, A. M. Dickinson, & M. P. Rosow (Eds.), Industrial behavior modification: A management handbook (pp. 115-134). New York, NY: Pergamon.
16. McGee, H. M., Dickinson, A. M., Huitema, B. E., & Culig, K. M. (2007). The effects of individual and group monetary incentives on high performance. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 19, 101-124.
17. Michael, J. (2007). Motivating operations. In J. O. Cooper, T. E. Heron, & W. L. Heward (Eds.), Applied behavior analysis (2nd ed.) (pp. 374-391). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.
18. Northcraft, G. B., & Earley, P. C. (1989). Technology, credibility, and feedback use. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 44, 83-96.
19. Orne, M. T. (1962). On the social psychology of the psychological experiment: With particular reference to demand characteristics and their implications. American Psychologist, 17, 776-783.
20. Peterson, N. (1982). Feedback is not a new principle of behavior. The Behavior Analyst, 5, 101-102.
21. Prue, D. M., & Fairbank, J. A. (1981). Performance feedback in organizational behavior management: A review. Journal of Organizational Behavior Management, 3, 1-16.
22. Schleifer, L. M., & Shell, R. L. (1992). A review and reappraisal of electronic performance monitoring, performance standards and stress allowances. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 49-53.
23. Smith, M. J., Carayon, P., Sanders, K. J., Lim, S. Y., & LeGrande, D. (1992). Employee stress and health complaints in jobs with and without electronic performance monitoring. Applied Ergonomics, 23, 17-27.
24. Wyckoff, L. B., Jr. (1952). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning: Part 1. Psychological Review, 59, 431-442.
25. Wyckoff, L. B., Jr. (1969). The role of observing responses in discrimination learning. In D. P. Hendry (Ed.), Conditioned reinforcement (pp. 237-260). Homewood, IL: Dorsey.