ESProNa: Constraint-based declarative business process modeling

Proceedings - IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Workshop, EDOC

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 91-98

  Igler, Michael ^a   Moura, Paulo ^b,c   Zeising, Michael ^a   Jablonski, Stefan ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF BAYREUTH   (Germany)

^b UNIVERSITY OF BEIRA INTERIOR   (Portugal)

^c UNIVERSITY OF PORTO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS PROCESS MODELING; CLINICAL PROCESS; CONSTRAINT PROPAGATION; CONSTRAINT-BASED; MODELING LANGUAGES; OPERATIONAL PROCESS; OTHER APPLICATIONS; PROCESS MODELING;

ONTOLOGY;

EID: 79951872815     PISSN: 15417719     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/EDOCW.2010.10     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (32)

1. H. Smith and P. Fingar, Business Process Management: The Third Wave. Meghan-Kiffer Press, 2003. [Online]. Available: http://portal.acm.org/citation. cfm?id=599722#
2. K. Hörmann, L. Dittmann, B. Hindel, and M. Müller, Spice in der Praxis: Interpretationshilfe für Anwender und Assesoren. Dpunkt Verlag, Mar 2006. [Online]. Available: http://books.google.com/books?-id= jKgZPQAACAAJ&printsec=frontcover
3. M. B. Chrissis, M. Konrad, and S. Shrum, CMMI: Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement (Sei Series in Software Engineering), 2nd ed. Addison-Wesley Longman, Amsterdam, November 2006. [Online]. Available: http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/redirect?tag=citeulike07-20n&path=ASIN/ 0321279670
4. ISO/IEC, "Process assessment - part 2: Performing an assessment," International Organization for Standardization, Tech. Rep., 2003.
5. H. Schonenberg, R. Mans, N. Russell, N. Mulyar, and W. M. P. van der Aalst, "Process flexibility: A survey of contemporary approaches." in CIAO!/EOMAS, ser. Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing, J. L. G. Dietz, A. Albani, and J. Barjis, Eds., vol. 10. Springer, 2008, pp. 16-30. [Online]. Available: http://dblp.uni-trier.de/db/conf/caise/ciao2008. html#SchonenbergMRMA08a
6. W. M. P. van der Aalst and S. Jablonski, "Dealing with workflow change: identification of issues and solutions," International Journal of Computer Systems Science and Engineering, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 267-276, September 2000.
7. B. Curtis, M. I. Kellner, and J. Over, "Process modeling," Commun. ACM, vol. 35, no. 9, pp. 75-90, 1992. (Pubitemid 23584400)
8. A. van Deursen, P. Klint, and J. Visser, "Domain-specific languages: an annotated bibliography," ACM SIGPLAN Notices, vol. 35, no. 6, pp. 26-36, 2000.
9. S. Jablonski, "Functional and behavioral aspects of process modeling in workflow management systems," in CON'94: Proceedings of the Ninth Austrian-informatics conference on Workflow management: challenges, paradigms and products. Munich, Germany, Germany: R. Oldenbourg Verlag GmbH, 1994, pp. 113-133.
10. C. Bußler, Organisationsverwaltung in Workflow Management Systemen. Dt. Univ.-Verl., Jan 1998.
11. T. Berners-Lee. Notation 3. W3C. http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/ Notation3.html. [Online]. Available: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Notation3. html
12. D. Brickley and R. V. Guha, "RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema," W3C, W3C Recommendation, February 2004.
13. P. Moura, "Logtalk - Design of an Object-Oriented Logic Programming Language," Ph.D. dissertation, Department of Computer Science, University of Beira Interior, Portugal, Sep. 2003.
14. M. Triska, "Generalising constraint solving over finite domains," in Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on Logic Programming, ser. LNCS, M. G. de la Banda and E. Pontelli, Eds., vol. 5366. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, Dec. 2008, pp. 820-821.
15. Y. Raimond. Henry: N3 parser and reasoner for swi-prolog. [Online]. Available: http://code.google.com/p/km-rdf/wiki/Henry
16. P. Moura, "Knowledge Representation Using Logtalk Parametric Objects," in Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Applications of Declarative Programming and Knowledge Management (INAP), S. Abreu and D. Seipel, Eds. University of Evora, Portugal, Nov. 2009, pp. 225-240.
17. P. Moura, "Logtalk 2.6 Documentation," http://logtalk.org/ files/trdmi20001a4.pdf.gz, University of Beira Interior, Portugal, Tech. Rep. DMI 2000/1, Jul. 2000.
18. D. Fahland, J. Mendling, H. Reijers, B. Weber, M. Weidlich, and S. Zugal, "Declarative vs. Imperative Process Modeling Languages: The Issue of Maintainability," in 1st International Workshop on Empirical Research in Business Process Management (ER-BPM'09), B. Mutschler, R. Wieringa, and J. Recker, Eds., Ulm, Germany, Sep. 2009, pp. 65-76, (LNBIP to appear).
19. W. M. P. Van Der Aalst, A. H. M. Ter Hofstede, B. Kiepuszewski, and A. P. Barros, "Workflow patterns," Distrib. Parallel Databases, vol. 14, no. 1, pp. 5-51, 2003.
20. P. Wohed, W. M. P. van der Aalst, M. Dumas, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, and N. Russell, "On the Suitability of BPMN for Business Process Modelling," in Business Process Management, 2006, pp. 161-176. (Pubitemid 44568325)
21. S. White. (2004, May) Business Process Modeling Notation (BPMN) - Version 1.0. [Online]. Available: http://www.bpmn.org/Documents/BPMN-V1-0-May-3-2004. pdf
22. OASIS. (2010, Mar) Web services business process execution language version 2.0. [Online]. Available: http://docs.oasis-open.org/wsbpel/2.0/OS/ wsbpel-v2.0-OS.html
23. P. Wohed, N. Russell, A. H. M. ter Hofstede, B. Andersson, and W. M. P. van der Aalst, "Patterns-based evaluation of open source BPM systems: The cases of jBPM, OpenWFE, and Enhydra Shark," Inf. Softw. Technol., vol. 51, no. 8, pp. 1187-1216, 2009.
24. jBPM 3.1 Workflow and BPM made practical, Chapater 9.6 Superstates. IBM. [Online]. Available: http://docs.jboss.com/jbpm/v3.1/userguide/en/html/ processmodelling.html
25. J. Mettraux. (2010, March) ruote 2.1. [Online]. Available: http: //ruote.rubyforge.org/
26. W. M. P. van der Aalst and Ter, "Yawl: yet another workflow language," Information Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 245-275, June 2005. [Online]. Available: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.is.2004.02.002 (Pubitemid 40415107)
27. Z. Zhou, S. Bhiri, and M. Hauswirth, "Control and data dependencies in business processes based on semantic business activities," in iiWAS'08: Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Information Integration and Web-based Applications & Services. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2008, pp. 257-263.
28. W. M. P. van der Aalst, M. Pesic, and H. Schonenberg, "Declarative workflows: Balancing between flexibility and support." Computer Science - R&D, vol. 23, no. 2, pp. 99-113, 2009.
29. M. Pesic, H. Schonenberg, and W. M. P. van der Aalst, "DECLARE: Full support for loosely-structured processes," in EDOC'07: Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Enterprise Distributed Object Computing Conference. Washington, DC, USA: IEEE Computer Society, 2007, p. 287.
30. 2CE v0.1: A vocabulary and execution model for declarative business process modeling," K.U.Leuven, FETEW Research Report KBI-0728, 2007.
31. D. Anicic, P. Fodor, N. Stojanovic, and R. Stühmer, "Computing complex events in an event-driven and logic-based approach," in DEBS'09: Proceedings of the Third ACM International Conference on Distributed Event-Based Systems. New York, NY, USA: ACM, 2009, pp. 1-2.
32. P. Dourish, J. Holmes, A. Maclean, P. Marqvardsen, and A. Zbyslaw, "Freeflow: Mediating between representation and action in workflow systems," in CSCW'96: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work. ACM Press, 1996, pp. 190-198.