Understanding the dynamics of community engagement of corporations in communities: The Iterative relationship between dialogue processes and local protest at the Tintaya Copper Mine in Peru

Society and Natural Resources

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 384-399

  Anguelovski, Isabelle ^a  

^a MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Corporate social responsibility; Deliberative democracy; Mining; Multiparty dialogues; Resource extraction

Indexed keywords

BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT; DEMOCRACY; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; MINING; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; STAKEHOLDER;

PERU;

EID: 79951862262     PISSN: 08941920     EISSN: 15210723     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08941920903339699     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Ali, S., and C. O'Faircheallaigh. 2007. Extractive industries, environmental performance and corporate social responsibility. Greener Manage. Int. 52:5-16.
2. Blowfield, M., and J. Frynas. 2005. Setting new agendas: Critical perspectives on corporate social responsibility in the developing world. Int. Affairs 81(3):499-513.
3. Brown, D. L. 2001. Practice-research engagement and civil society in a globalizing world. Vancouver: BC, Canada: Civicus.
4. Carmin, J., and D. Balser. 2002. Selecting repertoires of action in environmental movement organizations: An interpretive approach. Organization Environ. 15(4):365-388.
5. Cashore, B., G. Auld, and D. Newsom. 2004. Governing through markets: Forest certification and the emergence of non-state authority. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
6. Cohen, J. 1989. The economic basis of deliberative democracy. Social Philos. Policy 6(2):25-50.
7. Cohen, J. 2003. Power and reason. In Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance, ed. A. Fung, E. O. Wright, and R. Abers, 237-255. New York: Verso.
8. De Echave, J., K. Keenan, M. K. Romero, and A. Tapia. 2005. Los procesos de diálogo y la administración de conflictos en territorios de comunidades: El caso de la mina de Tintaya. (The dialogue processes and the management of conflicts in territories of communities: The case of the Tintaya mine). Lima, Peru: CooperAcción.
9. Della Porta, D., and S. Tarrow. 2004. Transnational protest and global activism. Latham, MD: Rowan & Littlefield.
10. Dryzek, J. 2000. Deliberative democracy and beyond: Liberals, critics, contestations. New York: Oxford University Press.
11. Evans, G., J. Goodman, and N. Lansbury. 2002. Moving mountains: Communities confront mining and globalization. New York: Zed Books.
12. Forester, J. 1999. The deliberative practitioner: Encouraging participatory planning processes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
13. Fraser, N. 1992. Rethinking the public sphere: A contribution to the critique of actually existing democracy. In Habermas and the public sphere, ed. C. Calhoun, 9-142. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
14. Frynas, J. 2005. The false developmental promise of corporate social responsibility: Evidence from multinational oil companies. Int. Affairs 81(3):581-598.
15. Fung, A., E. O. Wright, and R. Abers. 2003. Deepening democracy: Institutional innovations in empowered participatory governance. New York: Verso.
16. Glaser, B. G., and A. L. Strauss. 1967. The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago: Aldine.
17. Habermas, J. 1996. Three normative models of democracy. In Democracy and difference: Contesting boundaries of the politics, ed. S. Benhabib, 21-30. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
18. Hemmati, M. 2002. Multistakeholder processes for governance and sustainability: Beyond deadlock and conflict. London: Earthscan.
19. Innes, J. E. 2004. Consensus building: Clarifications for the critics. Plan. Theory. 3(1):5-20.
20. Kasturi, R. V., B. Brooke, and E. Reficco. 2006. Corporate responsibility and community engagement at the Tintaya Copper Mine (A). HBS Case 506-023. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business Review.
21. Lawrence, A. 2002. The drivers of stakeholder engagement: Reflections on the case of Royal Dutch=Shell. J. Corporate Citizenship. 6:71-85.
22. Levine, P., and R. Nierras. 2007. Activists' views of deliberation. J. Public Deliberation. 3(1):1-14.
23. Mansbridge, J. J. 1980. Beyond adversary democracy. New York: Basic Books.
24. Ministry of Energy, and Mines. 2001. Anuario minero. Lima, Peru: Ministry of Energy and Mines.
25. Morris, A., and C. McClurg. 1992. Frontiers in social movement theory. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
26. Muradian, R., J. Martinez-Alier, and H. Correa. 2003. International capital versus local population: The environmental conflict of the Tambogrande mining project, Peru. Society Nat. Resources 16:775-792.
27. Newell, P. 2005. Citizenship, accountability and community: The limits of the CSR agenda. Int. Affairs 81(3):541-557.
28. Pellow, D. 2001. Environmental justice and the political process: Movements, corporations, and the state. Sociol. Q. 42:47-67.
29. Polletta, F. 2005. How participatory democracy became white: Culture and organizational choice. Mobilization 10(2):271-288.
30. Prieto-Carron, M. 2006. Critical perspectives on CSR and development: What we know, what we don't know, and what we need to know. Int. Affairs 82(5):977-987.
31. QSR International. 2006. NVivo v. 7. Doncaster, Victoria, Australia: QSR International.
32. Shapiro, I. 1999. Enough of deliberation: Politics is about interests and power. In Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement, ed. S. Macedo, 28-38. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
33. Shapiro, I. 2003. The state of democratic theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
34. Susskind, L., P. Levy, and J. Thomas-Larmer. 2000. Negotiating environmental agreements: How to avoid escalating confrontation, needless costs, and unnecessary litigation. Washington, DC: Island Press.
35. Tarrow, S. 1994. Power in movement: Social movements, collective action, and politics, Cambridge studies in comparative politics. New York: Cambridge University Press.
36. Tewdwr-Jones, M., and P. Allmendinger. 1998. Deconstructing communicative rationality: A critique of Habermasian collaborative planning. Environ. Plan. A 30(11):1975-1989.
37. Vogel, D. 2005. The market for virtue: The potential and limits of corporate social responsibility. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
38. Walzer, M. 1999. Deliberation, and what else? In Deliberative politics: Essays on democracy and disagreement, ed. S. Macedo, 58-69. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
39. Walton, G., and J. Barnett. 2008. The ambiguities of environmental conflict: Insights from the Tolukuma Gold Mine, Papua New Guinea. Society Nat. Resources. 21:1-16.
40. Warren, M. E. 1996. Deliberative democracy and authority. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 90(1):46-60.
41. Wilson, T. M., and H. Donnan. 1998. Border identities: Nation and state at international frontiers. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. World Bank. 2001. Striking a better balance, volume 1. The final report of the Extractive Industries Review. Washington, DC: The World Bank.
43. Yankelovich, D. 1999. The magic of dialogue: Transforming conflict into cooperation. New York: Simon and Schuster.
44. Young, I. M. 2001. Activist challenges to deliberative democracy. Polit. Theory. 29(5):670-690.
45. Zalik, A. 2004. The Niger delta: 'Petro violence' and 'partnership development.' Rev. Afr. Polit. Econ. 31(101):401-424.