DEA presented graphically using multi-dimensional scaling

Modeling Data Irregularities and Structural Complexities in Data Envelopment Analysis

Volumn , Issue , 2007, Pages 171-187

  Adler, Nicole ^a   Raveh, Adi ^a   Yazhemsky, Ekaterina ^a  

^a HEBREW UNIVERSITY OF JERUSALEM   (Israel)

Author keywords

Co Plot; Data envelopment analysis; Multi dimensional scaling

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951844185     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-71607-7_10     Document Type: Chapter

References (25)

1. Adler, N., A. Raveh. 2006. Presenting DEA graphically. forthcoming in Omega.
2. Albriktsen, R., F. Forsund. 1990. A productive study of the Norwegian building industry. Journal of Productivity Analysis 2 53-66.
3. Banker, R. D., A. Charnes, W. W. Cooper. 1984. Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Management Science 30/9 1078-1092.
4. Belton, V., S. P. Vickers. 1993. Demystifying DEA - A virtual interactive approach based on multiple criteria analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society 44 883-896.
5. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper, B. Golany, L. Seiford, J. Stutz. 1985. Foundations of data envelopment analysis for Pareto-Koopmans efficient empirical production functions. Journal of Econometrics 30 91-107.
6. Desai, A., L. C. Walters. 1991. Graphical presentations of data envelopment analysis: Management implications from parallel axes representations. Decision Sciences 22 335-353.
7. El-Mahgary, S., R. Lahdelma. 1995. Data envelopment analysis: Visualizing the results. European Journal of Operational Research 85 700-710.
8. Gilady, R., Y. Spector, A. Raveh. 1996. Multidimensional scaling: An analysis of computers 1980-2990. European Journal of Operational Research 95 439-450.
9. Golany, B., J. E. Storbeck. 1999. A data envelopment analysis of the operational efficiency of bank branches. Interfaces 29 14-26.
10. Guttman, L. 1968. A general non-metric technique for finding the smallest space for a configuration of points. Psychometrica 33 469-506.
11. Hackman, S. T., U. Passy, L. K. Platzman. 1994. Explicit representation of the two-dimensional section of a production possibility set. The Journal of Productivity Analysis 5 161-170.
12. Joro, T., E-J Viitala. 2004. Weight-restricted DEA in action: From expert opinions to mathematical tools. Journal of the Operational Research Society 55 814-821.
13. Lipshitz, G., A. Raveh. 1994. Applications of the Co-Plot method in the study of socioeconomic differences among cities: A basis for a differential development policy. Urban Studies 31 123-135.
14. Maital, S., A. Vaninsky. 1999. Data envelopment analysis with a single DMU: A graphic projected-gradient approach. European Journal of Operational Research 115 518-528.
15. Raveh, A. 1986. On measures of monotone association. The American Statistician 40 117-123.
16. Raveh, A. 2000a. The Greek banking system: Reanalysis of performance. European Journal of Operational Research 120 525-534.
17. Raveh, A. 2000b. Co-Plot: A graphic display method for geometrical representations of MCDM. European Journal of Operational Research 125 670-678.
18. Scheel, H. 2001. Efficiency Measurement System. http://www.wiso. unidortmund.de/lsfg/or/scheel/ems.
19. Sinuany-Stern, Z., L. Friedman. 1998. DEA and the discriminant analysis of ratios for ranking units. European Journal of Operational Research 111 470-78.
20. Talby, D. 2005. Visual Co-Plot 5.5. http://www.cs.huji.ac.il/~davidt/ vcoplot/.
21. Talluri, S., M. M. Whiteside, S. J. Seipel. 2000. A nonparametric stochastic procedure for FMS evaluation. European Journal of Operational Research 124 529-538.
22. Viitala, H. J., H. Hänninen. 1998. Measuring the efficiency of public forestry organizations. Forestry Science 44 298-307.
23. Weber, C. A., A. Desai. 1996. Determination pf paths to vendor market efficiency using parallel coordinates representation: A negotiation tool for buyers. European Journal of Operational Research 90 142-155.
24. Weber, Y., O. Shenkar, A. Raveh. 1996. National versus corporate cultural fit in mergers and acquisitions: An exploratory study. Management Science 42 1215-1227.
25. Zhu, J. 1998. Data envelopment analysis versus principal component analysis: An illustrative study of economic performance of Chinese cities. European Journal of Operational Research 111 50-61.