Further Operationalization of Intra-Team Communication in Sports: An Updated Version of the Scale of Effective Communication in Team Sports (SECTS-2)

Journal of Applied Social Psychology

Volumn 41, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 471-487

  Sullivan, Philip J ^a   Short, Sandra ^b  

^a BROCK UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH DAKOTA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951843118     PISSN: 00219029     EISSN: 15591816     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2010.00722.x     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. Bentler, P. M. (1995). EQS structural equations program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
2. Brawley, L. R., Carron, A. V., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1988). Exploring the relationship between cohesion and resistance to disruption. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 10, 199-213.
3. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & S. J. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136-162). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Carron, A. V., Brawley, L. R., & Widmeyer, W. N. (1997). The measurement of cohesiveness in sport groups. In J. L. Duda (Ed.), Advancement in sport and exercise psychology measurement (pp. 213-226). Morgantown, WV: Fitness Information Technology.
5. Carron, A. V., Colman, M. M., Wheeler, J., & Stevens, D. (2002). Cohesion and performance in sport: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport and Exercise Psychology, 24, 168-188.
6. Cook, E. S., & Rice, E. (2003). Social exchange theory. In J. Delamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 53-76). New York: Plenum.
7. Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16, 297-334.
8. Davies, J. M. (2005). Team communication in the operating room. Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica, 49, 898-901.
9. DiBerardinis, J. D., Barwind, J., Flanningam, R. R., & Jenkins, V. (1983). Enhanced interpersonal relation as predictor of athletic performance. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 14, 243-251.
10. rd ed., pp. 264-286). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
11. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1974). Societal structures of the mind. Springfield, IL: Charles C. Thomas.
12. Hanin, Y. (1992). Social psychology and sport: Communication processes in top performance teams. Sport Science Review, 1, 13-28.
13. Hipple, J. W. (1970). Effects of differential human relations laboratory training designs on the interpersonal behavior of college students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI.
14. wg: An assessment of within-group interrater agreement. Journal of Applied Psychology, 78, 306-309.
15. Kiekel, P. A., Cooke, N. J., Foltz, P. W., & Shope, S. M. (2001). Automating measurement of team cognition through analysis of communication data. In M. J. Smith, G. Salvendy, D. Harris, & R. J. Koubek (Eds.), Usability evaluation and interface design (pp. 1382-1386). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
16. Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25, 259-284.
17. Loewenthal, K. M. (1996). An introduction to psychological tests and scales. London: UCL Press.
18. Mabry, E. A., & Barnes, R. E. (1980). The dynamics of small-group communication. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
19. Mortiz, S. E., & Watson, C. B. (1998). Levels of analysis issues in group psychology: Using efficacy as an example of a multilevel model. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, 2, 285-298.
20. nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
21. Poole, M. S., & McPhee, R. D. (1985). Methodology in interpersonal communication research. In M. L. Knapp & G. R. Miller (Eds.), Handbook of interpersonal communication (pp. 100-170). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
22. Short, S. E., Sullivan, P. J., & Feltz, D. L. (2005). Development and preliminary validation of the Collective Efficacy Questionnaire for Sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 9, 181-202.
23. Stokes, J., Fuerher, A., & Childs, L. (1983). Group members' self-disclosures: Relation to perceived cohesion. Small Group Behavior, 14, 63-76.
24. Stout, R. J., Salas, E., & Carson, R. (1994). Individual task proficiency and team process behavior: What's important for team functioning? Military Psychology, 6, 177-192.
25. Sullivan, P. J., & Feltz, D. L. (2000). The relationship between intra-team conflict and cohesion within hockey teams. Small Group Research, 32, 342-355.
26. Sullivan, P. J., & Feltz, D. L. (2003). The preliminary development of the Scale for Effective Communication in Team Sports (SECTS). Journal of Applied Sport Psychology, 33, 1693-1715.
27. th ed.). New York: HarperCollins.
28. Widmeyer, W. N., Brawley, L. R., & Carron, A. V. (1985). The measurement of cohesion in sports teams: The Group Environment Questionnaire. London, Ontario, Canada: Sports Dynamics.
29. Widmeyer, W. N., & Williams, J. (1991). Predicting cohesion in a coacting sport. Small Group Research, 22, 548-570.