Gray-level co-occurrence matrix bone fracture detection

American Journal of Applied Sciences

Volumn 8, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 26-32

  Chai, Hum Yan ^a   Wee, Lai Khin ^a,b   Swee, Tan Tian ^a   Salleh, Sh Hussain ^a   Ariff, A K ^a   Kamarulafizam, ^a  

^a UNIVERSITI TEKNOLOGI MALAYSIA   (Malaysia)

^b ILMENAU UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Bone fracture; Detection system; Femur bone; Gray level co occurrence matrix; Image processing; Long bone fracturesCAD system; Radiologic problem; Texture analysis

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951841131     PISSN: 15469239     EISSN: 15543641     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3844/ajassp.2011.26.32     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Caylak, E., 2010. The studies about phonological deficit theory in children with developmental dyslexia: Review. Am. J. Neurosci., 1: 1-12. DOI: 10.3844/ajnsp.2010.1.12
2. Donnelley, M., G. Knowles and T. Hearn, 2008. A CAD system for long-bone segmentation and fracture detection. Lect. Not. Comput. Sci., 5099: 153-162. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-69905-7_18
3. Haralick, R.M., 1979. Statistical and structural approaches to texture. Proceed. IEEE, 67: 786-804. DOI: 10.1109/PROC.1979.11328
4. Link, T., S. Majumdar, W. Konermann, N. Meier and J. Lin et al., 1997. Texture analysis of direct magnification radiographs of vertebral specimens: Correlation with bone mineral density and biomechanical properties. Acad. Radiol., 4: 167-176. DOI: 10.1016/S1076- 6332(05)80286-7
5. MacQueen, J.B., 1967. Some Methods for classification and Analysis of Multivariate Observations. Proceedings of 5th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, (BSMSP'1967), Berkeley, University of California Press, pp: 281-297.
6. Materka, A., P. Cichy and J. Tuliszkiewicz, 2000. Texture Analysis in Machine Vision. 1st Edn., World Scientific, Poland, ISBN-10: 9810243731, pp: 257.
7. Moustafa, A.A. and Z.A. Alqadi, 2009. A practical approach of selecting the edge detector parameters to achieve a good edge map of the gray image. J. Comput. Sci., 5: 355-362. DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2009.355.362
8. Omaima, N.A., 2010. Improving the performance of backpropagation neural network algorithm for image compression/decompression system. J. Comput. Sci., 6: 1347-1354. DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2010.1347.1354
9. Ouyang, X., S. Majumdar, T.M. Link, P.A.Y. Lu and J.C. Lin et al., 1998. Morphometric texture analysis of spinal trabecular bone structure assessed using orthogonal radiographic projections. Med. Phy., 25: 2037-2045. DOI: 10.1118/1.598391
10. Selvan, S., M. Kavitha, S. Shenbagadevi and S. Suresh, 2010. Feature extraction for characterization of breast lesions in ultrasound echography and elastography. J. Comput. Sci., 6: 67-74. DOI: 10.3844/jcssp.2010.67.74
11. Supriyanto, E., L.K. Wee and T.Y. Min, 2010. Ultrasonic marker pattern recognition and measurement using artificial neural network. Proceeding of the 9th WSEAS International Conference on Signal Processing, (ICSP'10), WSEAS, USA., pp: 35-40.
12. Swiontkowski, M.F. and S.D. Stovitz, 2005. Manual of Orthopaedics. 6th Edn., Lippincott Williams and Wilkinspages, United State, ISBN-10: 078175755X, pp: 512.
13. Tian, T.P., Y. Chen, W.K. Leow, W. Hsu and T.S. Howe et al., 2003. Computing neck-shaft angle of femur for x-ray fracture detection. Lect. Not. Comput. Sci., 2756: 82-89. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-45179-2_11
14. Veenland, J., T. Link, W. Konermann, N. Meier and J. Grashuis et al., 1997. Unraveling the role of structure and density in determining vertebral bone strength. Calcif. Tissue Int., 61: 474-479. PMID: 9383274
15. Wee, L.K. and E. Supriyanto, 2010. Automatic detection of fetal nasal bone in 2 dimensional ultrasound image using map matching. Proceeding of the 12th WSEAS International Conference on Automatic Control, Modelling and Simulation, (ACMOS' 10), WSEAS, USA., pp: 305-309.