Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

ANZ Journal of Surgery

Volumn 81, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 159-163

  He, Bulang ^a   Mitchell, Andrew ^a   Delriviere, Luc ^a   Shannon, Tom ^a   Pemberton, Richard ^a   Tan, Andrew ^b   Bremner, Alexandra ^c   Vivian, Justin ^b  

^a SIR CHARLES GAIRDNER HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b ROYAL PERTH HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

Author keywords

Complication; Kidney transplant; Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; PEROPERATIVE COMPLICATION; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; TRANSPLANTATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; HUMANS; INTRAOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; KIDNEY TRANSPLANTATION; LAPAROSCOPY; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEPHRECTOMY; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; TISSUE AND ORGAN HARVESTING; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 79951833695     PISSN: 14451433     EISSN: 14452197     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05568.x     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Ratner LE, Montgomery RA, Kavoussi LR. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy. A review of the first 5 years. Urol. Clin. North Am. 2001; 28: 709-19.
2. Oyen O, Andersen M, Mathisen L etal. Laparoscopic versus open living donor nephrectomy: experiences from a prospective, randomized, single-center study focusing on donor safety. Transplantation 2005; 79: 1236-40.
3. Simforoosh N, Basiri A, Tabibi A etal. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: a randomized controlled trial. BJU Int. 2005; 95: 851-5.
4. Wilson CH, Bhatti AA, Rix DA etal. Comparison of laparoscopic and open donor nephrectomy: UK experience. BJU Int. 2005; 95: 131-5.
5. Jacobs SC, Cho E, Foster C etal. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: The University of Maryland 6-year experience. J. Urol. 2004; 171: 47-51.
6. Tooher R, Boult M, Maddern GJ, Rao MM. Final report from the ASERNIP-S audit of laparoscopic live-donor nephrectomy. ANZ J. Surg. 2004; 74: 961-3.
7. Merlin TL, Scott DF, Rao MM etal. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: a systematic review. Transplantation 2000; 70: 1659-66.
8. Melcher ML, Carter JT, Duh Q-Y etal. More than 500 consecutive laparoscopic donor nephrectomies without conversion or repeated surgery. Arch. Surg. 2005; 140: 835-40.
9. Hadjianastassiou VG, Johnson RJ, Rudge CJ, Mamode N. 2509 living donor nephrectomies, morbidity and mortality, including the UK introduction of laparoscopic donor surgery. Am. J. Transplant. 2007; 7: 2532-7.
10. Leventhal JR, Kocak B, Salvalaggio PR etal. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy 1997 to 2003: lessons learned with 500 cases at a single institution. Surgery 2004; 136: 881-90.
11. Su LM, Ratner LE, Montgomery RA etal. Laparoscopic live donor nephrectomy: trends in donor and recipient morbidity following 381 consecutive cases. Ann. Surg. 2004; 240: 358-63.
12. Kocak B, Loffron AJ, Baker TB etal. Proposed classification of complications after live donor nephrectomy. Urology 2006; 67: 927-31.
13. Matas AJ, Bartlett ST, Leichtman AB etal. Morbidity and mortality after living kidney donation, 1999-2001: survey of United States transplant centers. Am. J. Transplant. 2003; 3: 830-4.
14. Najarian JS, Chavers BM, McHugh LE etal. 20 years or more of follow-up of living kidney donors. Lancet 1992; 340: 807-10.
15. Dekel Y, Mor E. Hem-o-lok clip dislodgment causing death of the donor after laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy. Transplantation 2008; 86: 887.
16. FDA U.S. Food and Drug Administration. Medical Device Recalls. Recall Number Z-1098-06. [Cited 12 April 2006.] Available from URL:
17. Ponsky L, Cherullo E, Moinzadeh A etal. The Hem-o-lok clip if safe for laparoscopic nephrectomy. A multiinstitutional review. Urology 2008; 71: 593-6.
18. Chan D, Bishoff JT, Ratner L etal. Endovascular gastrointestinal stapler device malfunction during laparoscopic nephrectomy: early recognition and management. J. Urol. 2000; 164: 319-21.
19. Deng DY, Meng MV, Nguyen HT etal. Laparoscopic linear cutting stapler failure. Urology 2002; 60: 415-9.
20. Ko EY, Castle EP, Desai PJ etal. Utility of the endovascular stapler for right-sided laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a 7-year experience at Mayo Clinic. J. Am. Coll. Surg. 2008; 207: 896-903.
21. Vastag B. Living-donor transplants reexamined: experts cite growing concerns about safety of donors. JAMA 2003; 290: 181-2.
22. Cushman M. Epidemiology and risk factors for venous thrombosis. Semin. Hematol. 2007; 44: 62-9.
23. Horie H, Endo N, Sata N, Yasuda Y, Nagai H. Postoperative venous thrombosis in general surgery patients and perioperative prophylaxis. Nippon Geka Gakkai Zasshi 2005; 106: 232-6.
24. Kroegel C, Reissig A. Principle mechanisms underlying venous thromboembolism: epidemiology, risk factors pathophysiology and pathogenesis. Respiration 2003; 70: 7-30.
25. Shafizadeh SF, Daily PP, Baliga P etal. Chylous ascites secondary to laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Urology 2002; 60: 345.
26. Wu CT, Chiang YJ, Liu KL, Chu SH. Laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: new combination of hand-assisted and standard approaches. Transplant. Proc. 2004; 36: 1909-11.
27. Geary B, Wade B, Wollmann W, El-Galley R. Laparoscopic repair of chylous ascites. J. Urol. 2004; 171: 1231.
28. Molina WR, Desai MM, Gill IS. Laparoscopic management of chylous ascites after donor nephrectomy. J. Urol. 2003; 170: 1938.
29. Breda A, Veale J, Liao J, Schulam PG. Complications of laparoscpic living donor nephrectomy and their management: the UCLA experience. Urology 2007; 69: 49-52.
30. Caumartin Y, Pouliot F, Sabbagh R, Dujardin T. Chylous ascites as a complication of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy. Transpl. Int. 2005; 18: 1378-81.
31. Buell JF, Edye M, Johnson M etal. Are concerns over right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy unwarranted? Ann. Surg. 2001; 233: 645-51.
32. Diner EK, Radolinski B, Murdock JD etal. Right laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Washington Hospital experience. Urology 2006; 68: 1175-7.
33. Sundaram CP, Martin GL, Guise A etal. Complications after a 5-year experience with laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: the Indiana University Experience. Surg. Endosc. 2007; 21: 724-8.