Social learning and human mate preferences: A potential mechanism for generating and maintaining between-population diversity in attraction

Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences

Volumn 366, Issue 1563, 2011, Pages 366-375

  Little, Anthony C ^a   Jones, Benedict C ^b   Debruine, Lisa M ^b   Caldwell, Christine A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF STIRLING   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ABERDEEN   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Copy; Culture; Facial attractiveness; Learning; Prestige bias; Social transmission

Indexed keywords

CULTURE; HUMAN BEHAVIOR; LEARNING; LIFE HISTORY TRAIT; MATE CHOICE; PREFERENCE BEHAVIOR; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SPECIES DIVERSITY;

ANIMALIA;

EID: 79951829385     PISSN: 09628436     EISSN: 14712970     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0192     Document Type: Review

References (86)

1. Richerson, P. J. & Boyd, R. 2005 Not by genes alone: how culture transformed human evolution. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Daly, M. & Wilson, M. 1988 Evolutionary socialpsychology and family homicide. Science 242, 519-524. (doi:10.1126/science.3175672)
3. Brown, G. R. & Fawcett, T. W. 2005 Sexual selection: copycat mating in birds. Curr. Biol. 15, R626-R628. (doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.08.005) (Pubitemid 41187477)
4. Dugatkin, L. A. 2000 The imitation factor: evolution beyond the gene. New York, NY: Free Press.
5. Galef, B. G. & Laland, K. N. 2005 Social learning in animals: empirical studies and theoretical models. Bioscience 55, 489-499. (doi:10.1641/0006-3568 (2005) 055 [0489:SLIAES]2.0.CO;2) (Pubitemid 40748383)
6. White, D. J. 2004 Influences of social learning on matechoice decisions. Learn. Behav. 32, 105-113. (Pubitemid 38585883)
7. Dugatkin, L. A. & Godin, J. G. J. 1992 Reversal of female mate choice by copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata). Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 249, 179-184. (doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0101) (Pubitemid 23403354)
8. Dugatkin, L. A. & Godin, J. G. J. 1993 Female mate copying in the guppy (Poecilia reticulata)-agedependent effects. Behav. Ecol. 4, 289-292. (doi:10. 1093/beheco/4.4.289)
9. Godin, J. G. J., Herdman, E. J. E. & Dugatkin, L. A. 2005 Social influences on female mate choice in the guppy, Poecilia reticulata: generalized and repeatable trait-copying behaviour. Anim. Behav. 69, 999-1005. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2004.07.016) (Pubitemid 40413329)
10. Witte, K. & Ryan, M. J. 2002 Mate choice copying in the sailfin molly, Poecilia latipinna, in the wild. Anim. Behav. 63, 943-949. (doi:10.1006/anbe.2001.1982) (Pubitemid 34749796)
11. Galef, B. G. & White, D. J. 1998 Mate-choice copying in Japanese quail, Coturnix coturnix japonica. Anim. Behav. 55, 545-552. (Pubitemid 28173950)
12. Swaddle, J. P., Cathey, M. G., Correll, M. & Hodkinson, B. P. 2005 Socially transmitted mate preferences in a monogamous bird: a non-genetic mechanism of sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. B 272, 1053-1058. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2005.3054) (Pubitemid 40943955)
13. White, D. J. & Galef, B. G. 2000 'Culture' in quail: social influences on mate choices of female Coturnix japonica. Anim. Behav. 59, 975-979. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1402) (Pubitemid 30656572)
14. Hoglund, J., Alatalo, R. V., Gibson, R. M. & Lundberg, A. 1995 Mate-choice copying in black grouse. Anim. Behav. 49, 1627-1633. (doi:10.1016/0003-3472 (95) 90085-3)
15. Schlupp, I. & Ryan, M. J. 1997 Male sailfin mollies (Poecilia latipinna) copy the mate choice of other males. Behav. Ecol. 8, 104-107. (doi:10.1093/beheco/8.1.104)
16. Uller, T. & Johansson, L. C. 2003 Human mate choice and the wedding ring effect-are married men more attractive? Hum. Nat. 14, 267-276. (Pubitemid 38077463)
17. Eva, K. W. & Wood, T. J. 2006 Are all the taken men good? An indirect examination of mate-choice copying in humans. Can. Med. Assoc. J. 175, 1573-1574. (doi:10.1503/cmaj.061367) (Pubitemid 44955125)
18. Hill, S. E. & Buss, D. M. 2008 The mere presence of opposite-sex others on judgments of sexual and romantic desirability: opposite effects for men and women. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 34, 635-647. (doi:10.1177/ 0146167207313728)
19. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P. & Feinberg, D. R. 2007 Social transmission of face preferences among humans. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 899-903. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.0205) (Pubitemid 47056773)
20. Sigall, H. & Landy, D. 1973 Radiating beauty-effects of having a physically attractive partner on person perception. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 28, 218-224. (doi:10. 1037/h0035740)
21. Little, A. C., Burriss, R. P., Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M. & Caldwell, C. A. 2008 Social influence in human face preference: men and women are influenced more for long-term than short-term attractiveness decisions. Evol. Hum. Behav. 29, 140-146. (doi:10. 1016/j.evolhumbehav. 2007.11.007) (Pubitemid 351234797)
22. Waynforth, D. 2007 Mate choice copying in humans. Hum. Nat. 18, 264-271.
23. Wade, M. J. & Pruett-Jones, S. G. 1990 Female copying increases the variance in male mating success. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 87, 5749-5753. (doi:10.1073/pnas.87. 15.5749)
24. Vandenberg, S. G. 1972 Assortative mating or who marries whom? Behav. Genet. 2, 127-157. (doi:10. 1007/BF01065686)
25. White, D. J. & Galef, B. G. 2000 Differences between the sexes in direction and duration of response to seeing a potential sex partner mate with another. Anim. Behav. 59, 1235-1240. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1431)
26. Buss, D. M. & Schmitt, D. P. 1993 Sexual strategies theory: an evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychol. Rev. 100, 204-232. (doi:10.1037/0033-295X. 100.2.204)
27. Simpson, J. A. & Gangestad, S. W. 1991 Individual differences in sociosexuality: evidence for convergent and discriminant validity. J. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 60, 870-883.
28. Bleske, A. L. & Shackleford, T. K. 2001 Poaching, promiscuity, and deceit: combating mating rivalry in same-sex friendships. Pers. Relat. 8, 407-424. (doi:10. 1111/j.1475-6811.2001.tb00048.x) (Pubitemid 33615185)
29. Little, A. C., Apicella, C. L. & Marlowe, F. W. 2007 Preferences for symmetry in human faces in two cultures: data from the UK and the Hadza, an isolated group of hunter-gatherers. Proc. R. Soc. B 274, 3113-3117. (doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.0895) (Pubitemid 350220155)
30. Thornhill, R. & Gangestad, S. W. 1999 Facial attractiveness. Trends Cogn. Sci. 3, 452-460. (doi:10.1016/S1364-6613 (99) 01403-5)
31. DeBruine, L. M. et al. 2006 Correlated preferences for facial masculinity and ideal or actual partner's masculinity. Proc. R. Soc. B 273, 1355-1360. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2005.3445) (Pubitemid 47308755)
32. Jones, B. C., DeBruine, L. M., Perrett, D. I., Little, A. C., Feinberg, D. R. & Smith, M. J. L. 2008 Effects of menstrual cycle phase on face preferences. Arch. Sexual Behav. 37, 78-84. (doi:10.1007/s10508-007-9268-y)
33. Little, A. & Perrett, D. 2002 Putting beauty back in the eye of the beholder. Psychologist 15, 28-32. (Pubitemid 36760944)
34. Little, A. C., Burt, D. M., Penton-Voak, I. S. & Perrett, D. I. 2001 Self-perceived attractiveness influences human female preferences for sexual dimorphism and symmetry in male faces. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268, 39-44. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2000.1327) (Pubitemid 32127951)
35. Cunningham, M. R., Roberts, A. R., Barbee, A. P. & Druen, P. B. 1995 'Their ideas of beauty are, on the whole, the same as ours': consistency and variability in the cross-cultural perception of female attractiveness. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 68, 261-279. (doi:10.1037/0022-3514.68.2.261)
36. Langlois, J. H., Kalakanis, L., Rubenstein, A. J., Larson, A., Hallamm, M. & Smoot, M. 2000 Maxims or myths of beauty? A meta-analytic and theoretical review. Psychol. Bull. 126, 390-423. (doi:10.1037/0033-2909. 126.3.390)
37. Darwin, C. 1871 The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. London, UK: John Murray.
38. Ford, C. S. & Beach, F. A. 1951 Patterns of sexual behaviour. New York, NY: Harper & Row.
39. Gangestad, S. W. & Buss, D. M. 1993 Pathogen prevalence and human mate preferences. Ethol. Sociobiol. 14, 89-96. (doi:10.1016/0162-3095 (93) 90009-7)
40. Gangestad, S. W., Haselton, M. G. & Buss, D. M. 2006 Evolutionary foundations of cultural variation: evoked culture and mate preferences. Psychol. Inquiry 17, 75-95. (doi:10.1207/s15327965pli1702-1) (Pubitemid 44672737)
41. DeBruine, L. M., Jones, B. C., Crawford, J. R., Welling, L. M. & Little, A. C. 2010 The health of a nation predicts their mate preferences: cross-cultural variation in women's preferences for masculinized male faces. Proc. R. Soc. B 277, 2405-2410. (doi:10.1098/rspb. 2009.2184)
42. Penton-Voak, I. S., Jacobson, A. & Trivers, R. 2004 Populational differences in attractiveness judgements of male and female faces: comparing British and Jamaican samples. Evol. Hum. Behav. 25, 355-370. (Pubitemid 41137045)
43. Little, A. C., Jones, B. C., Penton-Voak, I. S., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2002 Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 269, 1095-1100. (doi:10. 1098/rspb.2002.1984) (Pubitemid 34628251)
44. Brewis, A. A. & McGarvey, S. T. 2000 Body image, body size, and Samoan ecological and individual modernization. Ecol. Food Nutr. 39, 105-120. (doi:10.1080/03670244.2000.9991609)
45. Wilkinson, J. Y., Bentovim, D. I. & Walker, M. K. 1994 An insight into the personal and cultural significance of weight and shape in large Samoan women. Int. J. Obes. 18, 602-606. (Pubitemid 24268665)
46. Seifert, T. 2005 Anthropomorphic characteristics of centerfold models: trends towards slender figures over time. Int. J. Eat. Disord. 37, 271-274. (doi:10.1002/eat.20086) (Pubitemid 40628244)
47. Tovee, M. J., Reinhardt, S., Emery, J. L. & Cornelissen, P. L. 1998 Optimum body-mass index and maximum sexual attractiveness. Lancet 352, 548. (doi:10.1016/S0140-6736 (05) 79257-6) (Pubitemid 28372236)
48. Anderson, J. L., Crawford, C. B., Nadeau, J. & Lindberg, T. 1992 Was the Duchess of Windsor right-a cross-cultural review of the socioecology of ideals of female body shape. Ethol. Sociobiol. 13, 197-227. (doi:10.1016/0162- 3095 (92) 90033-Z)
49. Marlowe, F. & Wetsman, A. 2001 Preferred waist-to-hip ratio and ecology. Pers. Indiv. Differ. 30, 481-489. (doi:10.1016/S0191-8869 (00) 00039-8) (Pubitemid 33630909)
50. Wetsman, A. & Marlowe, F. 1999 How universal are preferences for female waist-to-hip ratios? Evidence from the Hadza of Tanzania. Evol. Hum. Behav. 20, 219-228. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138 (99) 00007-0) (Pubitemid 129516492)
51. Swami, V. & Tovee, M. J. 2005 Female physical attractiveness in Britain and Malaysia: a crosscultural study. Body Image 2, 115-128. (doi:10.1016/j.bodyim. 2005.02.002) (Pubitemid 40792381)
52. Tovee, M. J., Swami, V., Furnham, A. & Mangalparsad, R. 2006 Changing perceptions of attractiveness as observers are exposed to a different culture. Evol. Hum. Behav. 27, 443-456. (doi:10.1016/j.evolhumbehav. 2006.05.004) (Pubitemid 44567494)
53. Pruett-Jones, S. 1992 Independent versus nonindependent mate choice-do females copy each other. Am. Nat. 140, 1000-1009. (Pubitemid 23400175)
54. Westneat, D. F., Walters, A., McCarthy, T. M., Hatch, M. I. & Hein, W. K. 2000 Alternative mechanisms of nonindependent mate choice. Anim. Behav. 59, 467-476. (doi:10.1006/anbe.1999.1341) (Pubitemid 30656584)
55. Laland, K. N. 1994 Sexual selection with a culturally transmitted mating preference. Theor. Popul. Biol. 45, 1-15. (doi:10.1006/tpbi.1994.1001) (Pubitemid 2083940)
56. Fisher, R. A. 1930 The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford, UK: Clarendon Press.
57. Ryan, M. J. & Rand, S. 1990 The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the Tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 44, 305-314. (doi:10.2307/2409409) (Pubitemid 20429328)
58. Andersson, M. 1994 Sexual selection. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
59. Little, A. C. & Hancock, P. J. 2002 The role of masculinity and distinctiveness on the perception of attractiveness in human male faces. Br. J. Psychol. 93, 451-464. (doi:10.1348/000712602761381349)
60. Benson, P. J. & Perrett, D. I. 1993 Extracting prototypical facial images from exemplars. Perception 22, 257-262. (doi:10.1068/p220257)
61. Tiddeman, B. P., Burt, D. M. & Perrett, D. I. 2001 Prototyping and transforming facial texture for perception research. IEEE Comput. Graphic. Appl. 21, 42-50. (doi:10.1109/38.946630)
62. Perrett, D. I., Lee, K. J., Penton-Voak, I. S., Rowland, D. R., Yoshikawa, S., Burt, D. M., Henzi, S. P., Castles, D. L. & Akamatsu, S. 1998 Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. Nature 394, 884-887. (doi:10. 1038/29772) (Pubitemid 28410908)
63. Rhodes, G. 2006 The evolutionary psychology of facial beauty. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 57, 199-226. (doi:10.1146/annurev. psych.57.102904.190208) (Pubitemid 43237232)
64. Little, A. C. & Mannion, H. 2006 Viewing attractive or unattractive same-sex individuals changes self-rated attractiveness and face preferences in women. Anim. Behav. 72, 981-987. (doi:10.1016/j.anbehav. 2006.01.026) (Pubitemid 44634365)
65. Agrawal, A. F. 2001 The evolutionary consequences of mate copying on male traits. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 51, 33-40. (doi:10.1007/s002650100401) (Pubitemid 36058947)
66. Kirkpatrick, M. & Dugatkin, L. A. 1994 Sexual selection and the evolutionary effects of copying mate choice. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 34, 443-449. (doi:10.1007/BF00167336) (Pubitemid 2097842)
67. Henrich, J. & Gil-White, F. J. 2001 The evolution of prestige-freely conferred deference as a mechanism for enhancing the benefits of cultural transmission. Evol. Hum. Behav. 22, 165-196. (doi:10.1016/S1090-5138 (00) 00071-4) (Pubitemid 33623897)
68. Boyd, R. & Richerson, P. J. 1985 Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
69. Henrich, J. & McElreath, R. 2007 Dual inheritance theory: the evolution of human cultural capacities and cultural evolution. In Oxford handbook of evolutionary psychology (eds R. Dunbar & L. Barrett). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
70. Kelly, R. L. 1995 The foraging spectrum: diversity in hunter-gatherer lifeways. Washington, DC: Smithsonian Institution Press.
71. Silverman, P. & Maxwell, R. J. 1978 How do I respect thee-let me count ways-deference towards elderly men and women. Behav. Sci. Res. 13, 91-108.
72. Rogers, E. M. 1995 Diffusion of innovations. New York, NY: Free Press.
73. Baron, R. A. 1970 Attraction toward model and models competence as determinants of adult imitative behavior. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 14, 345-351.
74. Greenfeld, N. & Kuznicki, J. T. 1975 Implied competence, task complexity, and imitative behavior. J. Soc. Psychol. 95, 251-261. (doi:10.1080/00224545.1975. 9918711)
75. Kroll, Y. & Levy, H. 1992 Further tests of the separation theorem and the capital-asset pricing model. Am. Econ. Rev. 82, 664-670.
76. Offerman, T. & Sonnemans, J. 1998 Learning by experience and learning by imitating successful others. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 34, 559-575. (doi:10.1016/S0167-2681 (97) 00109-1) (Pubitemid 128344706)
77. Rosenbaum, M. E. & Tucker, I. F. 1962 Competence of model and learning of imitation and nonimitation. J. Exp. Psychol. 63, 183-190. (doi:10.1037/h0042363)
78. Bauer, G. P., Schlottmann, R. S., Bates, J. V. & Masters, M. A. 1983 Effect of state and trait anxiety and prestige of model on imitation. Psychol. Rep. 52, 375-382. (Pubitemid 13025321)
79. Eckel, C. C. & Wilson, R. K. 2007 Social learning in coordination games: does status matter? Exp. Econ. 10, 317-329. (doi:10.1007/s10683-007-9185- x)
80. Ryckman, R. M., Sherman, M. F. & Rodda, W. C. 1972 Locus of control and expertise relevance as determinants of changes in opinion about student activism. J. Soc. Psychol. 88, 107-114.
81. Weiss, H. M. 1977 Subordinate imitation of supervisor behavior-role of modeling in organizational socialization. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 19, 89-105. (doi:10. 1016/0030-5073 (77) 90056-3)
82. Weiss, H. M., Suckow, K. & Rakestraw, T. L. 1999 Influence of modeling on self-set goals: direct and mediated effects. Hum. Perform. 12, 89-114.
83. Mullen, B., Copper, C. & Driskell, J. E. 1990 Jaywalking as a function of model behavior. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 16, 320-330. (doi:10.1177/0146167290162012)
84. Amlacher, J. & Dugatkin, L. A. 2005 Preference for older over younger models during mate-choice copying in young guppies. Ethol. Ecol. Evol. 17, 161-169. (doi:10. 1080/08927014.2005.9522605) (Pubitemid 41059882)
85. Kendal, R. L., Coolen, I., van Bergen, Y. & Laland, K. N. 2005 Trade-offs in the adaptive use of social and asocial learning. Adv. Study Behav. 35, 333-379. (doi:10.1016/S0065-3454 (05) 35008-X) (Pubitemid 43574770)
86. Laland, K. N. 2004 Social learning strategies. Learn. Behav. 32, 4-14. (Pubitemid 38585874)