A Web-based resource model for scholarship 2.0: Object reuse & exchange

Concurrency and Computation: Practice and Experience

Volumn 24, Issue 18, 2012, Pages 2221-2240

  Lagoze, Carl ^a   Van De Sompel, Herbert ^b   Nelson, Michael ^c   Warner, Simeon ^d   Sanderson, Robert ^e   Johnston, Pete ^f  

^a Social Dynamics Laboratory   (United States)

^b LOS ALAMOS NATIONAL LABORATORY   (United States)

^c Old Dominion University   (United States)

^d University of Liverpool ^*  (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF LIVERPOOL   (United Kingdom)

^f Eduserv Foundation   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

eScience; Web 2.0; World Wide Web

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER APPLICATIONS; COMPUTER NETWORKS; E-SCIENCE; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMPOUND DOCUMENT; OPEN ARCHIVES INITIATIVES; OPEN ENVIRONMENT; SCHOLARLY COMMUNICATION; SCHOLARLY PUBLICATION; STATIC DOCUMENTS; WEB 2.0; WEB-BASED RESOURCES;

CONCURRENCY CONTROL;

EID: 79951825246     PISSN: 15320626     EISSN: 15320634     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cpe.1594     Document Type: Article

References (67)

1. O'Reilly T,. What is Web 2.0: Design patterns and business models for the next generation of software, 2005. Retrieved from O'Reilly Media, Inc. Available at: http://www.oreillynet.com/pub/a/oreilly/tim/news/2005/09/30/what- is-web-20.html [13 May 2010 ].
2. Berners-Lee T, Fischetti M,. Weaving the Web: The Original Design and Ultimate Destiny of the World Wide Web by Its Inventor. Harpers: San Francisco, 1999.
3. Bizer C, Cyganiak R, Heath T,. How to publish linked data on the Web. Free University of Berlin, 2007.
4. Borgman CL,. Scholarship in the Digital Age: Information, Infrastructure, and the Internet. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2007.
5. Hooker B,. The future of science is open, part 1: Open access, October 30, 2006. Retrieved from 3quarksdaily. Available at: http://3quarksdaily.blogs. com/3quarksdaily/2006/10/the-future-of-s-1.html [6 April 2009 ].
6. Hooker B,. The future of science is open, part 2: Open science, 27 November 2006. Retrieved from 3quarksdaily. Available at: http://3quarksdaily. blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2006/11/the-future-of-s.html. [6 April 2009 ].
7. Hooker B,. The future of science is open, part 3: An open science world, 22 January 2007. Retrieved from 3quarksdaily. Available at: http://3quarksdaily. blogs.com/3quarksdaily/2007/03/the-future-of-s.html [6 April 2009 ].
8. Waldrop MM,. Science 2.0 Is open access science the future? Scientific American, May 2008.
9. Wheeler B,. E-research is a fad: Scholarship 2.0, cyberinfrastructure, and IT governance. The Tower and the Cloud, Katz RN, (ed.). EDUCAUSE, Inc.: Washington, DC, 2008.
10. Bradley J-C,. Enhancing scientific communication through open notebook science. Scholar2Scholar, Drexel University Library, Philadelphia, 2008. Available at http://scholar2scholar.wikispaces.com/Presentation+Abstract+- +Enhancing+Scientific+Communication+through+Open+Notebook+Science [13 May 2010 ].
11. Ginsparg P,. Next-generation implications of open access. CTWatch Quarterly 2007; 3 (3).
12. Fox G,. Web 2.0 and Grids. Open Grid Forum. Chapel Hill: NC, 2007.
13. David S,. The open world. PhD Thesis, Science, Technology, and Society, Cornell University, 2007.
14. Jacobs N,. Open Access: Key Strategic, Technical and Economic Aspects. Chandos: Oxford, 2006.
15. Willinsky J,. The Access Principle: the Case for Open Access to Research and Scholarship. MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, 2006.
16. Sutor B,. Open standards vs. open source, 2006. Available at: http://www.sutor.com/newsite/essays/e-OsVsOss.php [30 March 2010 ].
17. Van de Sompel H, Lagoze C,. Interoperability for the discovery, use, and re-use of units of scholarly communication. CTWatch Quarterly 2007; 3 (3). Available at: http://www.ctwatch.org/quarterly/articles/2007/08/ interoperability-for-the-discovery-use-and-re-use-of-units-of-scholarly- communication/8/ [13 May 2010].
18. Van de Sompel H, Payette S, Erickson J, Lagoze C, Warner S,. Rethinking scholarly communication: Building the system that scholars deserve. D-Lib Magazine 10 (9). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/september04/vandesompel/ 09vandesompel.html [13 May 2010 ].
19. Smith A,. The research library in the 21st century: Collecting, preserving, and making it accessible resources for scholarship. No Brief Candle: Reconceiving Research Libraries for the 21st Century, Council on Library and Information Resources, Washington, DC, 2008.
20. Krafft D, Birkland A, Cramer E,. Ncore: Architecture and implementation of a flexible, collaborative digital library. JCDL 2008, Pittsburgh. ACM: New York, 2008.
21. Lagoze C, Van de Sompel H, Johnston P, Nelson M, Sanderson R, Warner S,. ORE specification and user guide Table of contents. open archives initiative, 2008. Available at: http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/toc [13 May 2010 ].
22. Van de Sompel H, Lagoze C, Nelson CE, Warner S, Sanderson R, Johnston P,. Adding eScience publications to the data Web. Linked Data on the Web 2009, Madrid, 2009.
23. Jacobs I, Walsh N,. Architecture of the World Wide Web. Proposed recommendation W3C. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2004/PR-webarch-20041105/ [10 May 2010 ].
24. Broder A, Kumar R, Maghoul F, Raghavan P, Rajagopalan S, Stata R, Tomkins A, Wiener J,. Graph structure in the Web. Proceedings of the Ninth International World Wide Web Conference: The Web: The Next Generation. Elsevier: Amsterdam, 2000. Available at: http://www9.org/w9cdrom/160/160.html [13 May 2010].
25. Sitemaps XML format, 2008. Available at: http://www.sitemaps.org/ protocol.php [7 April 2009 ].
26. Berners-Lee T, Hendler J, Lassila O,. The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 2001 (50). Available at: http://www.sciam.com/2001/0501issue/ 0501berners-lee.html [21 March 2009 ].
27. Brickley D, Guha RV,. RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema. Recommendation W3C. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/rdf-schema/ [10 February 2004 ].
28. Bojars U, Breslin JG, Finn A, Decker S,. Using the Semantic Web for linking and reusing data across Web 2.0 communities. Web Semantics: Science, Services and Agents on the World Wide Web, Karlsruhe, 2008.
29. Liu Y, Bai K, Mitra P, Giles CL,. TableSeer: Automatic table metadata extraction and searching in digital libraries. Seventh ACM/IEEE-CS Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, BC, 2007.
30. Kahn R, Wilensky R,. A framework for distributed digital object services. Working Paper cnri.dlib/tn95-01, Corporation for National Research Initiatives, 1995. Available at: http://www.cnri.reston.va.us/k-w.html [13 May 2010 ].
31. Maly K, Nelson ML, Zubair M,. Smart objects, dumb archives: A user-centric, layered digital library framework. D-Lib Magazine. Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/march99/maly/03maly.html [13 May 2010 ].
32. Payette S, Lagoze C,. Policy-enforcing, policy-carrying digital objects. Fourth European Conference on Research and Advanced Technology for Digital Libraries, Lisbon, Portugal, 2000. Available at: http://link.springer.de/link/ service/series/0558/papers/1923/19230144.pdf [13 May 2010 ].
33. Lagoze C, Payette S, Shin E, Wilper C,. Fedora: An architecture for complex objects and their relationships. International Journal of Digital Libraries 6 (2): 124-138. Available at: http://arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0501012 [13 May 2010 ].
34. Smith M, Bass M, McClellan G, Tansley R, Barton M, Branschofsky M, Stuve D, Walker JH,. DSpace: An open source dynamic digital repository. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (1). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/january03/smith/01smith. html [13 May 2010 ].
35. Van de Sompel H, Bekaert J, Liu X, Balakireva L, Schwander T,. aDORe: A modular, standard-based Digital Object Repository, 2005. Available at: http://www.arxiv.org/abs/cs.DL/0502028 [13 May 2010 ].
36. Crow R,. The case for institutional repositories: A SPARC position paper, 2002. The Scholarly Publishing and Academic Resources Coalition. Available at: http://www.arl.org/sparc/IR/ir.html [29 March 2009 ].
37. Johnson RK,. Institutional repositories: Partnering with faculty to enhance scholarly communication. D-Lib Magazine, 8 (11). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/november02/johnson/11johnson.html [13 May 2010 ].
38. Lynch CA,. Institutional repositories: Essential infrastructure for scholarship in the digital age. ARL: A Bimonthly Report (226), 2003.
39. Engestrom J,. What makes a good social object 2007. Retrieved from Zengestrom. Available at: http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/objectcentered- sociality/ [26 January 2009 ].
40. Engestrom J,. Why some social network services work and others don't Or: The case for object-centered sociality, 2005. Retrieved from Zengestrom. Available at: http://www.zengestrom.com/blog/2005/04/why-some-social.html [24 January 2009 ].
41. Reich, V,. LOCKSS: A permanent Web publishing and access system. D-Lib Magazine, 7 (6). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/june01/reich/06reich. html [13 May 2010 ].
42. Eiron N, McCurley K,. Untangling compound documents on the Web. Fourteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Notingham, U.K., 2003.
43. Archer P,. POWDER: Use cases and requirements. World Wide Web Consortium, 2007. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/2007/NOTE-powder-use-cases-20071031/ [13 May 2010 ].
44. Gerber A, Hunter J,. LORE: A compound object authoring and publishing tool for the Australian literature studies community. Digital Libraries: Universal and Ubiquitous Access to Information. Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2008.
45. Lagoze C, Van de Sompel H, Johnston P, Nelson M, Sanderson R, Warner S,. Abstract data model. Open archives initiative, 2008. Available at: http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/datamodel [13 May 2010 ].
46. Nottingham M,. HTTP header linking, draft-nottingham-http-link-header-00. IETF Network Working Group. Available at: http://www.mnot.net/drafts/draft- nottingham-http-link-header-00.txt [18 December 2006 ].
47. Lagoze C, Van de Sompel H, Johnston P, Nelson M, Sanderson R, Warner S,. Resource map implementation in atom. Open archives initiative, 2008. Available at: http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/atom [13 May 2010 ].
48. Lagoze C, Van de Sompel H, Johnston P, Nelson M, Sanderson R, Warner S,. Resource map implementation in RDF/XML. Open archives initiative, 2008. Available at: http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/rdfxml [13 May 2010 ].
49. Lagoze C, Van de Sompel H, Johnston P, Nelson M, Sanderson R, Warner S,. Resource map implementation in RDFa. Open archives initiative, 2008. Available at: http://www.openarchives.org/ore/1.0/rdfa [13 May 2010 ].
50. Gregorio J, Hora D,. The Atom Publishing Protocol. IETF, 2007.
51. Sauermann L, Cyganiak R, Volkel M,. Cool URIs for the Semantic Web. World Wide Web Consortium, 2007. Available at: http://www.w3.org/TR/cooluris/ [13 May 2010 ].
52. Choudhury S, DiLauro T, Szalay A, Vishniack E, Plante R,. Digital data preservation for scholarly publications in astronomy. International Journal of Digital Curation 2007; 2 (2): 21-30.
53. DiLauro T,. OAI-ORE for publishing workflos: Data archiving for journals of the American Astronomical Society. Open Repositories 2008, Southampton, U.K., 2008.
54. Cheung K, Hunter J, Lashtabeg A, Drennan J,. SCOPE A scientific compound object publishing and editing system. Third International Digital Curation Conference, Washington, DC, 2007.
55. Hunter J, Cheung K,. Provenance explorer A graphical interface for constructing scientific publication packages from provenance trails. International Journal of Digital Libraries 2007; 7 (1-2): 99-107.
56. Hoogerwerf M,. Durable enhanced publication. African Digital Scholarship and Curation, Pretoria, South Africa, 2009.
57. Lagoze C,. The oreChem project: Integrating chemistry scholarship with the Semantic Web. WebSci'09: Society On-line, Athens, 2009.
58. Adams N,. Semantic chemistry, 2009. Available at: http://www. semanticuniverse.com/articles-semantic-chemistry.html [ 2009 ].
59. Li W, Kolak O, Vu Q, Tokano H,. Defining logical domains in a web site. Eleventh ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, San Antonio, TX, 2003.
60. Dmitriev P, Lagoze C,. Automatically constructing descriptive site maps. Eighth Asia Pacific Web Conference, Harbin, China, 2006.
61. Dmitriev P, Lagoze C, Suchkov B,. As we may perceive: Inferring logical documents from hypertext. HT 2005 Sixteenth ACM Conference on Hypertext and Hypermedia, Salzburg, Austria, 2005.
62. Chakrabarti D, Kumar R, Punera K,. A graph-theoretic approach to webpage segmentation. Seventeenth International Conference on the World Wide Web, Beigin, China, 2008.
63. Embley D, Jiang Y, Ng Y,. Record-boundary discovery in Web documents. 1999 ACM SIGMOD International Conference on Management of Data, Philadelphia, PA, 1999.
64. Bekaert J,., Hochstenbach P,., Van de Sompel H,. Using MPEG-21 DIDL to represent complex digital objects in the Los Alamos National Laboratory Digital Library. D-Lib Magazine, 9 (11). Available at: http://www.dlib.org/dlib/ november03/bekaert/11bekaert.html [13 May 2010 ].
65. McDonough JP,. METS: Standardized encoding for digital library objects. International Journal of Digital Libraries 2006; 6 (2): 148-158.
66. IMS learning resource meta-data best practices and implementation guide, version 1.0 Final specification IMS Global Learning Consortium. Available at: http://www.imsproject.org/metadata/mdbest01.html [20 August 1999 ].
67. Boyko A, Kunze J, Littman J, Madden L,. The BagIt package format, 2008. Available at: http://www.cdlib.org/inside/diglib/bagit/bagitspec.html [3 April 2009 ].