A comparison of a graph database and a relational database: A data provenance perspective

Proceedings of the Annual Southeast Conference

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages

  Vicknair, Chad ^a   Nan, Xiaofei ^a   Macias, Michael ^a   Chen, Yixin ^a   Zhao, Zhendong ^a   Wilkins, Dawn ^a  

^a The University of Mississippi   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DATA PROVENANCE; DATA STORE; DATABASE TECHNOLOGY; DECLARATIVE QUERY LANGUAGES; FACEBOOK; GRAPH DATABASE; RELATIONAL DATABASE; SOFTWARE SYSTEMS; STORAGE AND RETRIEVALS;

QUERY LANGUAGES; SEARCH ENGINES;

RELATIONAL DATABASE SYSTEMS;

EID: 79951825053     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1145/1900008.1900067     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. R. Angles and C. Gutierrez. Survey of graph database models. ACM Comput Surv., 40(1): 1-39, 2008.
2. F. Chang, J. Dean, S. Ghemawat, W. C. Hsieh, D. A. Wallach, M. Burrows, T. Chandra, A. Fikes, and R. E. Gruber. Bigtable: A distributed storage system for structured data. ACM Trans. Comput. Syst., 26(2): 1-26, 2008.
3. G. DeCandia, D. Hastorun, M. Jampani, G. Kakulapati, A. Lakshman, A. Pilchin, S. Sivasubramanian, P. Vosshall, and W. Vogels. Dynamo: amazon's highly available key-value store. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev., 41(6): 205-220, 2007. (Pubitemid 351429377)
4. T. Ivarsson. [neo] security, http://lists.neo4j.org/ pipermail/user/2009- November/001955.html, 2009.
5. M. Kleppmann. Should you go beyond relational databases? http://carsonified.com/blog/dev/ should-you-go-beyond-relational-databases/, 2009.
6. A. Lakshman. Cassandra - a structured storage system on a p2p network, http : //www.facebook.com/note.php?note-id=24413138919, 2008.
7. Neo4j. Home, http://neo4j.org, 2009.
8. Project Voldemort. Project voldemort: A distributed database, http://project-voldemort.com/, 2009.