Development of an AHP-CBR evaluation system for remanufacturing: End-of-life selection strategy

International Journal of Sustainable Engineering

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 2-15

  Ghazalli, Z ^a   Murata, A ^a  

^a OKAYAMA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

AHP; Case based reasoning; Economical cost; End of life; Environmental cost; Remanufacturing

Indexed keywords

AHP; ECONOMICAL COSTS; END-OF-LIFE; ENVIRONMENTAL COSTS; REMANUFACTURING;

COSTS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEMS; INTEGRATION;

CASE BASED REASONING;

EID: 79951822335     PISSN: 19397038     EISSN: 19397046     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19397038.2010.528848     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Aamodt, A. and Plaza, E., 1994. Case based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations and system approaches. Artificial Intelligence Communications, 7 (1), 39-59.
2. Anityasari, M., 2008. Reuse of industrial products - a technical and economic model for decision support. Dissertation (PhD). The University of New South Wales, Australia.
3. Bufardi, A., et al., 2004. Multicriteria decision-aid approach for product end-of-life alternative selection. International Journal of Production Research, 42 (16), 3139-3157.
4. Chougule, R.G. and Ravi, B., 2005. Variant process planning of castings using AHP-based nearest neighbour algorithm. International Journal of Production Research, 43 (6), 1255-1273.
5. Desai, A., 2002. A design for disassembly algorithm based on quantitative analysis of design parameters affecting disassemblability. Thesis (Master's degree). University of Cincinnati, USA.
6. Feldmann, K., et al., 2001. Computer-based product structure analysis for technical goods regarding optimal end-of-life strategies. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B - Journal of Engineering Manufacture, 21 (5), 684-693.
7. Fernandez, I., et al., 2008. A decision-making support system on a products recovery management framework: a fuzzy approach. Concurrent Engineering, 16 (2), 129-138.
8. Gungor, A. and Gupta, S.M., 1997. Evaluation methodology for disassembly processes. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 33 (1-2), 329-332.
9. Hata, T., et al., 2000. Product life cycle simulation with quality model. Proceedings of the 7th CIRP international seminar on life cycle engineering, 27-29 November, Tokyo, Japan, 60-67. CIRP (The International Academy for Production Engineering). Available from: http://www.cirp.net/.
10. Herrmann, C., et al., 2006. Integrating end-of-life evaluation in conceptual design. IEEE international symposium on electronics and the environment, 8-11 May 2006, Scottsdale, AZ, USA. DOI: 0.1109/ISEE.2006.1650069.
11. Iakovou, E., et al., 2009. A methodological framework for endof-life management of electronic products. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 53 (6), 329-339.
12. Ilgin, M.A. and Gupta, S.M., 2010. Environmentally conscious manufacturing and product recovery: a review of the state of the art. Journal of Environmental Management, 91 (3), 563-591.
13. Johnson, M.R., 2002. Evaluating remanufacturing and demanufacturing for extended producer responsibility & sustainable product management. Dissertation (PhD). University of Windsor.
14. Jun, H.-B., et al., 2007. A multi-objective evolutionary algorithm for EOL product recovery optimization: turbocharger case study. International Journal of Production Research, 45 (18-19), 4573-4594.
15. Kaebernick, H., Anityasari, M. and Kara, S., 2002. A technical and economic model for end-of-life (EOL) options of industrial product. International Journal of Environment and Sustainable Development, 1 (2), 171-183.
16. Kim, K. and Han, I., 2001. The cluster indexing method for case based reasoning using self organizing maps and learning vector quantization for bond rating cases. Expert Systems with Applications, 21, 147-156.
17. Kolodner, J.L., 1991. Improving human decision making through case based decision aiding. Artificial Intelligence Magazine, 12 (2), 52-68.
18. Lee, S.G., Lye, S.W. and Khoo, M.K., 2001. A multiobjective methodology for evaluating product end-of-life options and disassembly. International Journal of Advanced anufacturing Technology, 18 (2), 148-156.
19. Li, S.-T. and Ho, H.-F., 2009. Predicting financial activity with evolutionary fuzzy case based reasoning. Expert System with Applications, 36, 411-422.
20. Li, H., et al., 2010. Hybridizing principles of TOPSIS with casebased reasoning for business failure prediction. Computers and Operation Research, 38 (2), 409-419, doi:10.1016/j.- cor.2010.06.008.
21. Liu, Z. and Inooka, H., 1998. Application of extended AHP to the analysis of user acceptance of environment-friendly car. Interdisciplinary Information Sciences, 4 (1), 29-38.
22. Park, C.-S. and Han, I., 2002. A case-based reasoning with the feature weights derived by analytic hierarchy process for bankruptcy prediction. Expert Systems with Applications, 23 (3), 255-264.
23. Rose, C.M., 2000. Design for environment: a method for formulating product end-of-life strategies. Dissertation (PhD). Stanford University, Stanford, USA.
24. Saaty, T.L., 1994. How to make decisions: the analytic hierarchy process. Interfaces, 24 (6), 19-43.
25. Shih, H.L., Chang, Y.S. and Lin, Y.T., 2003. Selecting product EOL strategy via case - based reasoning. Proceedings of EcoDesign2003: third international symposium on environmentally conscious design and inverse manufacturing, Tokyo, Japan, 288-290. DOI: 10.1109/VETECE.2003.239734.
26. Shih, H.L., Chang, Y.S. and Lin, Y.T., 2006. Intelligent evaluation approach for electronic product recycling via case - based reasoning. Advance Engineering Informatics, 20, 137-145.
27. Staikos, T. and Rahimifard, S., 2007. An end-of-life decision support tool for product recovery considerations in footwear industry. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 20 (6), 602-615.
28. Steinhilper, R., 1998. Remanufacturing: the ultimate form of recycling. Stuggart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
29. Sun, S. and Wang, X., 2006. The realization and discussion of the credit risk evaluation system. Journal of Communication and Computer, 3 (5), 119-125, (Serial No. 18).
30. The European Parliament and the Council of European Union, 2000. Directive 2000/53/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 September2000 on End-of-life Vehicles. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
31. The European Parliament and the Council of European Union, 2003a. Directive 2002/96/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on Waste Electrical and Electronic Equipment (WEEE). Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
32. The European Parliament and the Council of European Union, 2003b. Directive 2002/95/Ec of the European Parliament and of the Council of 27 January 2003 on the Restriction of the Use of Certain Hazardous Substances in Electrical and Electronic Equipment. Brussels: Official Journal of the European Communities.
33. Veerakamolmal, P. and Gupta, S.M., 2002. A case-based reasoning approach for automating disassembly process planning. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 13, 47-60.
34. Vong, C.M., Leung, T.P. and Wong, P.K., 2002. Case-based reasoning and adaptation in hydraulic production machine design. Engineering Applications in Artificial Intelligence, 15, 567-585.
35. Zeid, I., Gupta, S.M. and Bardasz, T., 1997. A case-based reasoning approach to planning for disassembly. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing, 8, 97-106.
36. Zhang, H.C., et al., 2000. A decision-making model for materials management of end-of-life electronic products. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 19 (2), 94-107.
37. Zussman, E., 2000. Linking remanufacturing process and product design. Proceedings of the CIRP international seminar on life cycle engineering, Tokyo, Japan, 249-255. CIRP (The International Academy for Production Engineering). Available from: http://www.cirp.net/.