Side-docking in robotic-assisted gynaecologic cancer surgery

International Journal of Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery

Volumn 7, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 51-54

  Woods, Demetrius Leon ^a   Hou, June Y ^a   Riemers, Laura ^a   Gupta, Divya ^a   Kuo, Dennis Yi Shin ^a  

^a ALBERT EINSTEIN COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Hysterectomy; Minimally invasive surgery; Robotic surgery

Indexed keywords

SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; TRANSPLANTATION (SURGICAL);

ASSOCIATED COSTS; CLINICAL PARAMETERS; HYSTERECTOMY; MINIMALLY-INVASIVE SURGERY; RETRIEVAL TIME; ROBOTIC ASSISTED SURGERIES; ROBOTICS SURGERY; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TIME COST;

ROBOTIC SURGERY;

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED SURGERY; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GYNECOLOGIC CANCER; GYNECOLOGIC SURGERY; HUMAN; HYSTERECTOMY; MINIMALLY INVASIVE SURGERY; OPERATION DURATION; PATIENT POSITIONING; ROBOTICS; SITE DOCKING; UTERINE CERVIX CANCER; UTERUS; UTERUS CANCER;

EID: 79951818295     PISSN: 14785951     EISSN: 1478596X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/rcs.368     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. United States Food and Drug Administration website: (accessed 28 May 2010).
2. Bell MC, Torgenson J, Seshadri-Kreaden U, et al. Comparison of outcomes and cost for endometrial cancer staging via traditional laparotomy, standard laparoscopy and robotic techniques. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: 407-411.
3. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. Perioperative outcomes of robotically assisted hysterectomy for benign cases with complex pathology. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 585-593.
4. Veljovich DS, Paley PJ, Drescher CW, et al. Robotic surgery in gynecologic oncology: program initiation and outcomes after the first year with comparison with laparotomy for endometrial cancer staging. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 198: 679 e1-10.
5. Advincula AP, Xu X, Goudeau S IV, et al. Robotic assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short term surgical outcomes and immediate costs. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2007; 14: 698-705.
6. Persson J, Reynisson P, Borgfeldt C, et al. Robot Assisted laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy with short and long term morbidity data. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 113: 185-190.
7. Magrina JF, Kho R, Magtibay PM. Robotic radical hysterectomy: technical aspects. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113: 28-31.
8. Holloway RW, Patel SD, Ahmad S. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Scand J Surg 2009; 98: 96-109.
9. Robot-assisted surgery. ACOG technology assessment in obstetrics and gynecology, No. 6, American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists. Obstet Gynecol 2009; 114: 1153-1155.
10. Lenihan JP Jr, Kovanda C, Seshardi-Kreaden U. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 589-594.
11. Lin PS, Wakabayashi MT, Han ES. Role of robotic surgery in endometrial cancer. Curr Treat Options Oncol 2009; 10: 33-43.
12. Payne TN, Dauterive FR. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2008; 15: 286-291.
13. Kho RM, Hilger WS, Hentz JG, et al. Robotic hysterectomy: technique and initial outcomes. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2007; 197: 113.e1-e4.
14. Centers for Disease Control. Differences in prevalence of obesity among black, white and Hispanic adults-US, 2006-2008. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2009; 58: 740-744; (accessed 28 May 2010).
15. Altekruse SF, Kosary CL, Krapcho M, et al. (eds). SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2007; National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD, USA: ; based on November 2009 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER website 2010.
16. Bonilla DJ, Mains L, Whitaker R, et al. Uterine weight as a predictor of morbidity after a benign abdominal and total laparoscopic hysterectomy. J Reprod Med 2007; 52: 490-498.
17. Lowe MP, Chamberlain DH, Kamelle SA, et al. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 113: 191-194.
18. Shafer A, Boggess JF. Robotic-assisted endometrial cancer staging and radical hysterectomy with the Da Vinci surgical system. Gynecol Oncol 2008; 111: S18-23.
19. Boggess JF, Gehrig PA, Cantrell L, et al. A comparative study of three surgical methods for hysterectomy with staging for endometrial cancer: robotic assistance, laparoscopy, laparotomy. Am J Obstet Gynecol 2008; 199: 360.e1-9.
20. Holloway RW, Ahmad S, DeNardis SA, et al. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic hysterectomy and lymphadenectomy for endometrial cancer: analysis of surgical performance. Gynecol Oncol 2009; 115: 447-452.
21. Weiss G. Racial differences in women who have a hysterectomy for benign conditions. Women's Health Issues 2009; 19: 202-210.