The joint development of JM-12.7: A technographic description of the making of a bean variety

NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences

Volumn 57, Issue 3-4, 2011, Pages 207-216

  Almekinders, C J M ^a  

^a WAGENINGEN UNIVERSITY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Boundary object; Common bean; PPB; Social making; Variety development

Indexed keywords

AGRICULTURAL RESEARCH; DICOTYLEDON; FARMERS ATTITUDE; NONGOVERNMENTAL ORGANIZATION; PLANT BREEDING; RESEARCH WORK; SOCIAL ORGANIZATION;

NICARAGUA;

PHASEOLUS VULGARIS;

EID: 79951814565     PISSN: 15735214     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.njas.2010.11.007     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. C. Almekinders, J. Hardon, Bringing Farmers Back into Breeding. Experiences with Participatory Plant Breeding and challenges for institutionalisation 2006 Agromisa Special 5 Wageningen 125 Available from: http://documents.plant.wur.nl/cgn/literature/reports/ BringingFarmersBackIntoBreeding-2006.pdf.
2. T. Walker Participatory Varietal Selection, Participatory Plant Breeding, and Varietal Change. Background Paper for the World Development Report 2008 2006 World Bank Washington, DC p. 31, Available from: http://siteresources. worldbank.org/INTWDR2008/Resources/2795087-1191427986785/WalkerT- ParticipatoryVarietalSelectionPPB-complete.pdf
3. S. Ceccarelli, E. Guimares, E. Weltzien, Plant Breeding and Farmer Participation 2009 FAO p. 671
4. M. Lipton, and R. Longhurst New Seeds and Poor People 1989 Unwin Hyman London p. 473
5. R. Chambers, A. Pacey, L.A. Thrupp, Farmer First: Farmer Innovation and Agricultural Research 1989 ITDG London p. 219
6. P. Richards Indigenous Agricultural Revolution: Ecology and Food Production in West Africa 1985 Unwin Hyman London p. 192
7. J. Hardon Participatory plant breeding. The outcome of a workshop on participatory plant breeding, 26-29 July 1995 Issues in Genetic Resources 3 1995 IPGRI, Rome
8. C. Reijntjes, B. Haverkort, A. Waters-Bayer, Farming for the Future. An Introduction to Low-external-input and Sustainable Agriculture, The MacMillan Press Ltd., London, 1992, p. 250.
9. S. Ceccarelli Wide adaptation, how wide? Euphytica 40 1989 197 205
10. A. Elings, C.J.M. Almekinders, P. Stam (Eds.), Breeding for low-input conditions, and consequences for Participatory Plant Breeding, Euphytica 122 (2001) (Special issue).
11. D.A. Cleveland, D. Soleri, and Introduction Farmers, scientists and plant breeding. Knowledge, practice and possibilities for collaboration D.A. Cleveland, D. Soleri, Farmers, Scientist and Plant Breeding. Integrating Knowledge and Practice 2002 CABI Wallingford 1 18
12. S. McGuire, G. Manicad, L. Sperling, Technical and institutional issues in participatory plant breeding done from a perspective of farmer plant breeding. PPB Monograph 2, PRGA, CIAT, Colombia, 2003, p. 109.
13. J. Ashby The impact of participatory plant breeding S. Ceccarelli, E. Guimares, E. Weltzien, Plant Breeding and Farmer Participation 2009 FAO 649 671
14. V. Hoffmann, K. Probst, and A. Christinck Farmers and researchers: how can collaborative advantages be created in participatory research and technology development? Agriculture and Human Values 24 2007 355 368 (Pubitemid 47193835)
15. L. Fortmann, Participatory Research in Conservation and Rural Livelihoods. Doing Science Together 2008 Wiley-Blackwell Oxford 261
16. P. Richards Farmers also experiment: a neglected intellectual resource in African science Discovery and Innovation 1 1989 19 25
17. P. Mollinga Boundary work and the complexity of natural resources management Crop Science 50 2010 S-1-S-9
18. H. Maat The history and future of agricultural experiments NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 35 2011 187 195
19. L. van Veldhuizen, A. Waters-Bayer, C. Wettasinha, Advancing PTD: making our way towards institutional integration. In: Advancing Participatory Technology Development. Case Studies on Integration into Agricultural Research, Extension and Education, Silang, Cavite, IRR/ETC Ecoculture, pp. 1-20.
20. P. Richards Reviving the Green Revolution: a technographic approach P. Hebinck, G. Verschoor, Resonances and Dissonances in Development: Actors, Networks and Cultural Repertoires 2001 Uitgeverij Van Gorcum 19 32
21. K. Jansen, and S. Vellema What is a technography? NJAS - Wageningen Journal of Life Sciences 57 2011 169 177
22. S.L. Star, and J.R. Griesemer Institutional ecology, 'translations' and boundary objects: amateurs and professionals in Berkeley's museum of vertebrate zoology, 1907-39 Social Studies of Science 19 1989 387 420
23. S.L. Star This is not a boundary object: reflections on the origin of a concept Science Technology Human Values 35 2010 601 617
24. T.F. Gieryn Boundary-work and the demarcation of science from non-science: strains and interests in professional ideologies of scientists American Sociology Review 48 1983 781 795
25. J.H. Fujimura, Crafting science: standardized packages, boundary objects and 'translation', in: A. Pickering (Ed.), Science as Practice and Culture, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, 1992, pp. 168-211.
26. C. Almekinders, J. Molina Centeno, R. Herrera Torrez, S.L. Merlo Olivera, J.M. Gonzalez Suárez, and J. García Carrasco Experiencias y aprendizajes del desarrollo de variedades de frijol de manera participativa en el norte de Nicaragua Agronomía Mesoamericana 17 2006 327 336
27. M. Widengrd, Intellectual property rights in common bean breeding. Opportunities and constraints for local and participatory breeding in Nicaragua, MSc thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences/Upsala University, p. 114. Available from: http://ex-epsilon.slu.se:8080/archive/00000089/01/ Widengard.pdf.
28. E. Aguilar, Evaluating a Participatory Plant Breeding approach in a local seed system of Northern Nicaragua: challenges for upscaling technologies and institutions, MSc Thesis Agroecology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, 2007, p. 137. Available from: http://www.programa-fpma.org.ni/ documents/capacit/thesis-eduard-aguilar.pdf.
29. C. Almekinders, E. Aguilar, and R. Herrera New bean seeds and the struggle for their dissemination ILEIA Newsletter 23 2 2007 14 16
30. C. Almekinders, F. Guevara, El entorno de FP y la vida de agricultores. Estudio de la línea de base y los cambios ocurridos entre 2000-2008 en los proyectos de fitomejoramiento participativo en Meso-América. CIPRES, Managua/Wageningen/Chiapas, 2008, p. 65. Available from: http://www.tad.wur.nl/ NR/rdonlyres/80766907-B38E-4F4B-9F02-5E2BA3C90747/119036/EntornoDeLaVida- LineaDeBase1.pdf.
31. G. Trouche, L. Narváez, Z. Chow, and J. Corrales Fitomejoramiento participativo del arroz de secano en Nicaragua: metodologías, resultados y lecciones aprendidas Agronomía Mesoamericana 17 2006 309 325
32. G. Trouche, K. vom Brocke, S. Aguirre, and Z. Chow Giving new sorghum variety options to resource-poor farmers in Nicaragua through participatory varietal selection Experimental Agriculture 45 2009 451 467
33. S. Humphries, J. Jimenez, F. Sierra, O. Gallardo, Sharing in innovation: reflections on a partnership to improve livelihoods and resource conservation in the Honduran Hillsides, in: L. Freeman (Ed.), Participatory Research in Conservation and Rural Livelihoods. Doing Science Together, Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, 2008, pp. 36-69.
34. J.C. Rosas, O. Gallardo, and J. Jiménez Mejoramiento de maíces criollos de Honduras mediante la aplicación de metdologías de fitomejoramiento participativo Agronomía Mesoamericana 17 2006 383 392
35. R. Araya Villalobos, and J.C. Hernández Fonseca Mejora genético participative de la variedad criolla de frijol "Sacapobres" Agronomía Mesoamericana 17 2006 347 355
36. R. Ortiz, H. Ríos, S. Miranda, M. Ponce, E. Quintero, and O. Chaveco Avances del mejoramiento genético participativo del frijol en Cuba Agronomía Mesoamericana 17 2006 337 346
37. H. Ríos, and J. Wright Early attempts to stimulate seed flows in Cuba ILEIA Newsletter 15 3/4 1999 38 39