Strategy for preventing bacterial contamination by adding exogenous ethanol in solid-state semi-continuous bioethanol production

Journal of Bioscience and Bioengineering

Volumn 111, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 343-345

  Katakura, Yoshio ^a,b   Moukamnerd, Churairat ^b   Harashima, Satoshi ^b   Kino oka, Masahiro ^b  

^a KANSAI UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bacterial contamination; Bioethanol; Lactobacillus plantarum; Solid state fermentation (SSF)

Indexed keywords

BACTERIAL CONTAMINATION; BIO-ETHANOL PRODUCTION; ETHANOL FERMENTATION; ETHANOL YIELD; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; SEMI-CONTINUOUS; SOLID-STATE FERMENTATION (SSF);

BACTERIOLOGY; BIOETHANOL; CONTAMINATION; FERMENTATION; SACCHARIFICATION;

ETHANOL;

ALCOHOL; BIOETHANOL; BIOFUEL; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ALCOHOL PRODUCTION; ARTICLE; BACTERIUM CONTAMINATION; BIOFUEL PRODUCTION; BIOMASS; FERMENTATION; LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM; PRODUCTIVITY; RECYCLING; SACCHARIFICATION;

BIOREACTORS; ETHANOL; FERMENTATION; INDUSTRIAL MICROBIOLOGY; LACTOBACILLUS; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE;

BACTERIA (MICROORGANISMS); LACTOBACILLUS PLANTARUM;

EID: 79951813302     PISSN: 13891723     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiosc.2010.11.012     Document Type: Article

References (11)

1. Dien B.S., Cotta M.A., Jeffries T.W. Bacteria engineered for fuel ethanol production: current status. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2003, 63:258-266.
2. Chen H., Qiu W. Key technologies for bioethanol production from lignocellulose. Biotechnol. Adv. 2010, 28:556-562.
3. Moukamnerd C., Kino-oka M., Sugiyama M., Kaneko Y., Boonchird C., Harashima S., Noda H., Ninomiya K., Shioya S., Katakura Y. Ethanol production from biomass by repetitive solid-state fed-batch fermentation with continuous recovery of ethanol. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2010, 88:87-94.
4. Muthaiyan A., Ricke C.S. Current perspectives on detection of microbial contamination in bioethanol fermentors. Bioresour. Technol. 2010, 101:5033-5042.
5. Schell D.J., Dowe N., Ibsen K.N., Riley C.J., Ruth M.F., Lumpkin R.E. Contamination occurrence, identification and control in a pilot-scale corn fiber to ethanol conversion process. Bioresour. Technol. 2007, 98:2942-2948.
6. Makanjuola D.B., Tymon A., Springham D.G. Some effects of lactic acid bacteria on laboratory-scale yeast fermentations. Enzym. Microb. Technol. 1992, 14:350-357.
7. Narendranath N.V., Power R. Relationship between pH and medium dissolved solid in terms of growth and metabolism of Lactobacilli and Saccharomyces cerevisiae during ethanol production. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2005, 71:2230-2243.
8. Narendranath N.V., Power R. Effect of yeast inoculation rate on metabolism of contamination lactobacilli during fermentation of corn mash. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2004, 31:581-584.
9. Watanabe I., Nakamura T., Shima J. A strategy to prevent the occurrence of Lactobacillus strains using lactate-tolerant yeast Candida glabrata in bioethanol production. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 2008, 35:1117-1122.
10. Saithong P., Nakamura T., Shima J. Prevention of bacteria contamination using acetate-tolerant Schizosaccharomyces pombe during biooethanol production from molasses. J. Biosci. Bioeng. 2009, 3:216-219.
11. Bischoff K.M., Liu S., Leathers T.D., Worthington R.E., Rich J.O. Modeling bacterial contamination of fuel ethanol fermentation. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2009, 103:117-122.