Packer in Context: Formalism and Fairness in the Due Process Model

Law and Social Inquiry

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 237-261

  Aviram, Hadar ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951794630     PISSN: 08976546     EISSN: 17474469     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-4469.2010.01230.x     Document Type: Article

References (95)

1. Amar, Akhil Reed. 1998. Terry and Fourth Amendment First Principles. St. John's Law Review 72 (3-4): 1097-131.
2. Arenella, Peter. 19831984. Rethinking the Functions of Criminal Procedure: The Warren and Burger Courts' Competing Ideologies. Georgetown Law Journal 72 (2): 185-248.
3. Aviram, Hadar, and Daniel L. Portman 2009. Inequitable Enforcement: Introducing the Concept of Equity into Constitutional Review of Law Enforcement. Hastings Law Journal 61 (2): 413-57.
4. Baker, Donald I., and William Blumenthal 1983. The 1982 Guidelines and Preexisting Law. California Law Review 71 (2): 311-47.
5. Beckett, Katherine. 1997. Making Crime Pay: Law and Order in Contemporary American Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
6. Beloof, Douglas Evan. 1999. The Third Model of Criminal Process: The Victim Participation Model. Utah Law Review 1999 (2): 289-331.
7. Bibas, Stephanos. 2001a. Apprendi and the Dynamics of Guilty Pleas. Stanford Law Review 54 (2): 311-18.
8. Bibas, Stephanos. 2001b. Apprendi's Perverse Effects on Guilty Pleas under the Guidelines. Federal Sentencing Reporter 13:333-39.
9. Bibas, Stephanos. 2001c. Judicial Fact-Finding and Sentence Enhancements in a World of Guilty Pleas. Yale Law Journal 110 (7): 1097-186.
10. Blumberg, Abraham S. 1969. Review of The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, by Herbert L. Packer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 117 (5): 790-94.
11. Braithwaite, John, and Philip Pettit 1992. Not Just Desert: A Republican Theory of Justice. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2007. Federal Justice Statistics. (accessed October 7, 2010).
13. Charles, William H. R. 1970. Review of The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, by Herbert Packer. University of Toronto Law Journal 20 (1): 109-12.
14. Cord, Robert L. 19751976. Neo-incorporation: The Burger Court and the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Fordham Law Review 44 (2): 215-48.
15. Cray, Ed. 2008. Chief Justice: A Biography of Earl Warren. New York: Simon and Schuster.
16. Damaska, Mirjan. 1973. Evidentiary Barriers to Conviction and Two Models of Criminal Procedure: A Comparative Study. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 121 (3):506-89.
17. Dressler, Joshua, and George III Thomas 2006. Criminal Procedure: Principles, Policies, and Perspectives, 3rd ed. St. Paul, MN: Thomson/West.
18. Dudley, Earl C., Jr. 1998. Terry v. Ohio, the Warren Court, and the Fourth Amendment: A Law Clerk's Perspective. St. John's Law Review 72 (3-4): 891-904.
19. Ehrlich, Thomas, Gerald Gunther, J. Keith Mann, Byron D. Sher, and John Henry Merryman, Chairman 1972. Memorial Resolution: Herbert L. Packer, Stanford Historical Society, (accessed October 7, 2010).
20. Eisenstein, James, and Herbert Jacob 1977. Felony Justice: An Organizational Analysis of Criminal Courts. Boston: Little, Brown.
21. Epstein, Lee, Valerie Hoekstra, Jeffrey A. Segal, and Harold J. Spaeth 1998. Do Political Preferences Change? A Longitudinal Study of U.S. Supreme Court Justices. Journal of Politics 60 (3): 801-18.
22. Feeley, Malcolm M. 1979a. Pleading Guilty in Lower Courts. Law & Society Review 13 (2): 461-66.
23. Feeley, Malcolm M. 1979b. The Process Is the Punishment: Handling Cases in a Lower Criminal Court. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
24. Findley, Keith A. 2009. Toward a New Paradigm of Criminal Justice: How the Innocence Movement Merges Crime Control and Due Process. Texas Tech Law Review 41 (1): 133-74.
25. Foote, Caleb. 1956. Vagrancy-Type Law and Its Administration. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 104 (3): 603-50.
26. Foote, Daniel H. 1992. The Benevolent Paternalism of Japanese Criminal Justice. California Law Review 80 (2): 317-90.
27. Garland, David. 2001. The Culture of Control: Crime and Social Order in Contemporary Society. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Golding, M. P. 1971. Review of The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, by Herbert Packer. Philosophical Review 80 (1): 117-22.
29. Goldstein, Abraham S. 1973. Reflections on Two Models: Inquisitorial Themes in American Criminal Procedure. Stanford Law Review 26 (4): 1009-26.
30. Goldstein, Joseph. 1960. Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low-Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice. Yale Law Journal 69 (4): 543-94.
31. Goodman, James E. 1995. Stories of Scottsboro. New York: Vintage.
32. Griffiths, John. 1970a. Ideology in Criminal Procedure, or a Third "Model" of the Criminal Process. Yale Law Journal 79 (3): 359-417.
33. Griffiths, John. 1970b. The Limits of Criminal Law Scholarship. Review of The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, by Herbert Packer. Yale Law Journal 79 (7): 1388-474.
34. Griset, Pamala L. 1991. Determinate Sentencing: The Promise and the Realities of Retributive Justice. Albany, NY: SUNY Albany Press.
35. Heumann, Milton. 1981. Plea Bargaining: The Experiences of Prosecutors, Judges, and Defense Attorneys. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
36. Hrvatin, Adriano. 2001. United States v. Nordby: Ninth Circuit Survey-Case Summary. Golden Gate University Law Review 31 (1): 105-22.
37. Jareborg, Nils. 1995. What Kind of Criminal Law Do We Want? In Beware of Punishment: On the Utility and Futility of Criminal Law, ed. Annika Snare, 17-45. Oslo: Pax Forlag.
38. Kalman, Laura. 2005. Yale Law School and the Sixties: Revolt and Reverberations. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.
39. Katz, Al. 1969. Review of The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, by Herbert Packer. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 117 (4): 640-44.
40. Katz, Lewis R. 20042005. Terry v. Ohio at Thirty-Five: A Revisionist View. Mississippi Law Journal 74 (2): 423-500.
41. King, Michael. 1981. The Framework of Criminal Justice. London: Croom Helm.
42. King, Nancy J., and Susan R. Klein 2001. Apprendi and Plea Bargaining. Stanford Law Review 54 (2): 295-310.
43. Leo, Richard A. 1996. Miranda's Revenge: Police Interrogation as a Confidence Game. Law & Society Review 30 (2): 259-88.
44. Leo, Richard A. 2008. Police Interrogation and American Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
45. Lynch, Mona. 2009. Sunbelt Justice. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
46. Macdonald, Stuart. 2008. Constructing a Framework for Criminal Justice Research: Learning from Packer's Mistakes. New Criminal Law Review 11 (2): 257-311.
47. Maclin, Tracey. 1998. Terry v. Ohio's Fourth Amendment Legacy: Black Men and Police Discretion. St. John's Law Review 72 (3-4): 1271-322.
48. McBarnet, Doreen J. 1981. Conviction: Law, the State and the Construction of Justice. London: Macmillan.
49. McCoy, Candace. 2003. The Politics of Problem-Solving: An Overview of the Origins and Development of Therapeutic Courts. American Criminal Law Review 40 (4): 1513-34.
50. Muir, William K., Jr. 1977. Police: Streetcorner Politicians. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
51. Nardulli, Peter F. 1978. The Courtroom Elite: An Organizational Perspective on Criminal Justice. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
52. Packer, Herbert L. 1958. Ex-Communist Witnesses: Four Studies in Fact-Finding. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
53. Packer, Herbert L. 1964a. Two Models of the Criminal Process. University of Pennsylvania Law Review 113:1-68.
54. Packer, Herbert L. 1964b. The Warren Report: A Measure of the Achievement. Nation, November 2, 295.
55. Packer, Herbert L. 1966. The Courts, the Police, and the Rest of Us. Journal of Criminal Law, Criminology, and Police Science 57 (3): 238-43.
56. Packer, Herbert L. 1968. The Limits of the Criminal Sanction. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
57. Roach, Kent. 1999. Four Models of the Criminal Process. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 89 (2): 671-716.
58. Schur, Edwin M. 1965. Crimes without Victims: Deviant Behavior and Public Policy: Abortion, Homosexuality, Drug Addiction. New York: Prentice Hall.
59. Schwartz, Adina. 19951996. Just Take away Their Guns: The Hidden Racism of Terry v. Ohio. Fordham Urban Law Journal 23 (2): 317-76.
60. Schwartz, Murray L. 1969. Review of The Limits of the Criminal Sanction, by Herbert Packer. Stanford Law Review 21 (5): 1277-94.
61. Sebba, Leslie. 2006. Herbert Packer's Models of Criminal Justice in Historical Perspective. Paper presented at New Directions in Criminal Courtroom Research, Tel Aviv, Israel.
62. Simon, Jonathan. 2007. Governing through Crime: How the War on Crime Transformed American Democracy and Created a Culture of Fear. New York: Oxford University Press.
63. Skolnick, Jerome H. 1966. Justice without Trial: Law Enforcement in a Democratic Society. New York: Wiley.
64. Stickels, John W. 2008. The Victim Satisfaction Model of the Criminal Justice System. Journal of Criminology and Criminal Justice Research and Education (accessed October 7, 2010).
65. Stith, Kate, and Jose A. Cabranes 1998. Fear of Judging: Sentencing Guidelines in the Federal Courts. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
66. Sudnow, David. 1965. Normal Crimes: Sociological Features of the Penal Code in a Public Defender's Office. Social Problems 12:255-76.
67. Sundby, Scott E. 1998. An Ode to Probable Cause: A Brief Response to Professors Amar and Slobogin. St. John's Law Review 72 (3-4): 1133-40.
68. Whitebread, Charles H., and Christopher Slobogin 2006. Criminal Procedure: An Analysis of Cases and Concepts. New York: Foundation Press.
69. Adams v. Williams, 407 U.S. 143 (1972).
70. Adamson v. California, 332 U.S. 46 (1947).
71. Alabama v. White, 496 U.S. 325 (1990).
72. Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224 (1998).
73. Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466 (2000).
74. Barron v. Baltimore, 32 U.S. 242 (1833).
75. Blakely v. Washington, 542 U.S. 296 (2004).
76. Community Release Board v. Superior Court, 91 Cal. App. 3d 814 (1979).
77. Cunningham v. California, 549 U.S. 270 (2007).
78. Gideon v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335 (1963).
79. Hurtado v. California, 110 U.S. 516 (1884).
80. In re Winship, 397 U.S. 358 (1970).
81. Jones v. United States, 526 U.S. 227 (1999).
82. Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007).
83. Malloy v. Hogan, 378 U.S. 1 (1964).
84. Mapp v. Ohio, 367 U.S. 643 (1961).
85. Maryland v. Buie, 494 U.S. 325 (1990).
86. Michigan v. Long, 463 U.S 1032 (1983).
87. Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436 (1966).
88. Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361 (1986).
89. Monge v. California, 524 U.S. 721 (1998).
90. People v. Begnald, 205 Cal. App. 3d 1548 (1991).
91. Powell v. Alabama 287 U.S. 45 (1932).
92. Rita v. United States, 551 U.S. 338 (2007).
93. Terry v. Ohio, 392 U.S. 1 (1968).
94. United States v. Booker, 543 U.S. 220 (2005).
95. Whren etal. v. United States, 517 U.S 806 (1996).