Percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the nonagenarians: A prospective study evaluating pain reduction and new symptomatic fracture rate

Spine

Volumn 36, Issue 4, 2011, Pages 277-282

  Depalma, Michael J ^a   Ketchum, Jessica M ^a   Frankel, Bruce M ^a   Frey, Michael E ^a  

^a VIRGINIA COMMONWEALTH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

low back pain; osteoporosis; recurrent fracture; vertebral fracture; vertebroplasty

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT; BONE CEMENT;

AGED; ANALGESIA; ARTICLE; COMPRESSION FRACTURE; DISEASE DURATION; EXTRAVASATION; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRAGILITY FRACTURE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INTERVERTEBRAL DISK; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; OSTEOPOROTIC VERTEBRAL COMPRESSION FRACTURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PERCUTANEOUS VERTEBROPLASTY; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE;

AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANALGESICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; FRACTURES, COMPRESSION; HUMANS; MALE; OSTEOPOROSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT (HEALTH CARE); PAIN MEASUREMENT; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SPINAL FRACTURES; TIME FACTORS; VERTEBROPLASTY;

EID: 79951773048     PISSN: 03622436     EISSN: 15281159     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181cf8a37     Document Type: Article

References (48)

1. Watts NB, Harris ST, Genant HK. Treatment of painful osteopo-rotic vertebral fractures with percutaneous vertebroplasty or ky-phoplasty. Osteoporos Int 2001;12:429-37. (Pubitemid 32607084)
2. Riggs BL, Melton LJ III. The worldwide problem of osteoporo-sis: insights afforded by epidemiology. Bone 1995;17(suppl 5): S505-11.
3. Gold DT. The clinical impact of vertebral fractures: quality of life in women with osteoporosis. Bone 1996;18(suppl 3):S185-9.
4. Sinaki M. Falls, fractures, and hip pads. Curr Osteoporos Rep 2004;2:131-7.
5. Leech JA, Dulberg C, Kellie S, et al. Relationship of lung func-tion to severity of oseteoporosis in women. Am Rev Respir Dis 1990;14:68-71. (Pubitemid 20023384)
6. Kado DM, Duong T, Stone KL, et al. Incident vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Osteoporos Int 2003;14:589-94. (Pubitemid 36975559)
7. Kado DM, Huan MH, Karlamangla AS, et al. Hyperkyphotic posture predicts mortality in older community-dwelling men and women: a prospective study. J Am Geriatr Soc 2004;52: 1662-7. (Pubitemid 41709919)
8. Kado DM, Browner WS, Palermo L. Vertebral fractures and mortality in older women: a prospective study. Study of Osteo-porotic Fractures Research Group. Arch Intern Med 1999;159: 1215-20. (Pubitemid 29269861)
9. Hall SE, Criddle RA, Comito TL, et al. A case-control study of qual-ity of life and functional impairment in women with long-standing vertebral osteoporotic fracture. Osteoporos Int 1999;9:508-15. (Pubitemid 29348566)
10. Zethraeus N, Ben Sedrine W, Caulin F, et al. Models for assessing the costeffectiveness of the treatment and prevention of osteoporo-sis. Osteoporos Int 2002;13:841-57. (Pubitemid 35364785)
11. Cauley JA, Thompson DE, Ensrud KC. Risk of mortality following clinical fractures. Osteoporos Int 2000;11:556-61.
12. Johnell O, Kanis JA, Oden A, et al. Mortality after osteoporotic fractures. Osteoporos Int 2004;15:38-42. (Pubitemid 38252438)
13. Galibert P, Deramond H, Rosat P, et al. Preliminary note on the treatment of vertebral angioma by percutaneous acrylic vertebro-plasty. Neurochirurgie 1987;33:166-8.
14. Cyteval C, Sarrabere MP, Roux JO, et al. Acute osteoporotic verte-bral collapse: open study on percutaneous injection of acrylic surgi-cal cement in 20 patients. Am J Roentgenol 1999;173:1685-90.
15. Do HM, Kim BS, Marcellus ML, et al. Prospective analysis of clini-cal outcomes after percutaneous vertebroplasty for painful osteopo-rotic vertebral body fractures. Am J Neuroradiol 2005;26:1623-8. (Pubitemid 43853654)
16. Liliang PC, Su TM, Liang CL, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty improves pain and physical functioning in the elderly osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture patients. Gerontology 2005;51: 34-9.
17. Voormolen MH, Lohle PN, Lampmann LE, et al. Prospective clini-cal follow-up after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with painful os-teoporotic vertebral compression fractures. J Vasc Interv Radiol 2006;17:1313-20. (Pubitemid 44259014)
18. McKiernan F, Faciszewski T, Jensen R. Quality of life following ver-tebroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2004;86:2600-6.
19. Chen LH, Niu CC, Yu Sw, et al. Minimally invasive treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture. Chang Gung Med J 2004;27:261-7.
20. Diamond TH, Champion B, Clark WA. Management of acute verte-bral fractures: a nonrandomized trial comparing percutaneous ver-tebroplasty with conservative therapy. Am J Med 2003;114:326-8.
21. Alvarez L, Pérez-Higueras A, Granzio JJ, et al. Predictor of out-comes of percutaneous vertebroplasty for osteoporotic vertebral factures. Spine 2005;30:87-92. (Pubitemid 40209283)
22. Pérez-Higueras A, Alvarez L, Rossi RE, et al. Percutaneous verte-broplasty: long-term clinical and radiological outcome. Neuroradi-ology 2002;44:250-9.
23. Jensen ME, Dion JE. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in the treatment of osteoporotic compression fractures. Neuroimaging Clin N Am 2000;10:547-68.
24. Hansson TH, Keller TS, Spengler DM. Mechanical behavior of the human lumbar spine. II. Fatigue strength during dynamic compres-sion loading. J Orthop Res 1987;5:479-87. (Pubitemid 17167514)
25. Syed M, Jan S, Patel NA, et al. Vertebroplasty: the alternative treat-ment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the elderly. Clin Geriatr 2006;14:20-3.
26. Uppin AA, Hirsch JA, Centenera LV, et al. Occurrence of new ver-tebral body fracture after percutaneous vertebroplasty in patients with osteoporosis. Radiology 2003;226:119-24. (Pubitemid 36163918)
27. Cahana A, Seium Y, Diby M, et al. Percutaneous vertebroplasty in octogenarians: results and follow-up. Pain Pract 2005;5:316-23. (Pubitemid 41807080)
28. Myers ER, Wilson SE. Biomechanics of osteoporosis and vertebral fracture. Spine 1997;22(suppl 24):S25-31.
29. Tohmeh AG, Mathis JM, Fenton DC, et al. Biomechanical efficacy of unipedicular versus bipedicular vertebroplasty for the management of osteoporotic compression fractures. Spine 1999;24:1772-6. (Pubitemid 29426669)
30. Belkoff SM, Mathis JM, Jasper LE, et al. The biomechanics of ver-tebroplasty. The effect of cement volume on mechanical behavior. Spine 2001;26:1537-41. (Pubitemid 32646123)
31. Molloy S, Mathis JM, Belkoff SM. The effect of vertebral body percentage fill on mechanical behavior during percutaneous verte-broplasty. Spine 2003;28: 1549-54. (Pubitemid 36877089)
32. Harrington KD. Major neurological complications following per-cutaneous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case re-port. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2001;83:1070-3. (Pubitemid 32662111)
33. Wenger M, Markwalder TM. Surgically controlled, transpedicular methylmethacrylate vertebroplasty with fluoroscopic guidance. Acta Neurochir 1999;141:625-31. (Pubitemid 29281486)
34. Lee BJ, Lee SR, Yoo TY. Paraplegia as a complication of percuta-neous vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate: a case report. Spine 2002;27:E419-22.
35. Chiras J, Depriester C, Weill A, et al. Vertebroplasties percutanees: technique et indications[in French]. J Neuroradiol 1997;24:45-59. (Pubitemid 27292806)
36. Gangi A, Kastler BA, Dietman JL. Percutaneous vertebroplasty guided by a combination of CT and fluoroscopy. Am J Neuroradiol 1994;15:83-6. (Pubitemid 24033495)
37. Aebli N, Krebs J, Davis G, et al. Fat embolism and acute hypoten-sion during vertebroplasty. An experimental study in sheep. Spine 2002;27:460-6. (Pubitemid 34461275)
38. Sinaki M, Itoi E, Wahner HW, et al. Stronger back muscles reduce the incidence of vertebral fractures: a prospective 10 year follow-up of post-menopausal women. Bone 2002;30:836-41. (Pubitemid 34616010)
39. Huntoon EA, Schmidt CK, Sinaki M. Significantly fewer refrac-tures after vetebroplasty in patients who engage in back-extensor-strengthening exercises. Mayo Clin Proc 2008;83:54-7.
40. Lin WC, Lee YC, Lee CH, et al. Refractures in cemented vertebrae after percutaneous vertebroplasty: a retrospective analysis. Eur Spine J 2008;17:592-9.
41. Lee WS, Sung KH, Jeong HT, et al. Risk factors of developing new symptomatic vertebral compression fractures after percutaneous ver-tebroplasty in osteoporotic patients. Eur Spine J 2006;15:1777-83. (Pubitemid 44900604)
42. Komemushi A, Tanigawa N, Kariya S, et al. Percutaneous verte-broplasty for osteoporotic compression fracture: multivariate study of predictors of new vertebral body fracture. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol 2006;29:580-5. (Pubitemid 43823002)
43. Frankel B. Vertebral augmentation. Platform presentation. Austin, TX: North American Spine Society; 2007.
44. Berlemann U, Ferguson SJ, Nolte LP, et al. Adjacent vertebral fail-ure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation. J Bone Joint Surg Br 2002;84:748-52. (Pubitemid 34846392)
45. Sun K, Liebschner MA. Evolution of vertebroplasty: a biomechani-cal perspective. Ann Biomed Eng 2004;32:77-91.
46. Kayanja MM, Togawa D, Lieberman IH. Biomechanical changes after the augmentation of experimental osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures in the cadaveric thoracic spine. Spine J 2005;5:55-63. (Pubitemid 40104289)
47. Pollitine P, Dolan P, Tobias JH, et al. Intervertebral disc de-generation can lead to "stress-shielding" of the anterior ver-tebral body. A cause of osteoporotic vertebral fracture? Spine 2004;29:774-82. (Pubitemid 38437527)
48. McCormas AJ, Fawcett PR, Campbell MJ, et al. Electrophysiologi-cal estimation of the number of motor units within a human mus-cle. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1971;34:121.