Cost-effectiveness of targeted versus tailored interventions to promote mammography screening among women military veterans in the United States

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 97-104

  Lairson, David R ^a   Chan, Wen ^a   Chang, Yu Chia ^a   del Junco, Deborah J ^b   Vernon, Sally W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SCHOOL OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

Cost effectiveness; Mammography; Screening promotion; Tailoring; Veterans

Indexed keywords

COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DECISION MAKING; HETEROGENEITY; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BREAST TUMOR; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; ECONOMICS; FEMALE; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; PREVALENCE; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS; UNITED STATES; VETERAN;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; EARLY DETECTION OF CANCER; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MARKETING OF HEALTH SERVICES; MIDDLE AGED; MODELS, ECONOMIC; PREVALENCE; UNITED STATES; VETERANS;

EID: 79951771013     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2010.07.003     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. American Cancer Society Breast cancer facts & figures 2007-2008 2007, American Cancer Society, Inc, Atlanta, GA.
2. Andersen M.R., Hager M., Su C., Urban N. Analysis of the cost-effectiveness of mammography promotion by volunteers in rural communities. Health Education & Behavior 2002, 29:755-770.
3. Berg A.O., Allan J.D., Frame P.S., Homer C.J., Johnson M.S., Klein J.D., et al. Screening for breast cancer: Recommendations and rationale. Annals of Internal Medicine 2002, 137:344-346.
4. Berry D.A. The screening mammography paradox: Better when found, perhaps better not to find. British Journal of Cancer 2008, 98:1729-1730.
5. Berry D.A., Cronin K.A., Plevritis S.K., Fryback D.G., Clarke L., Zelen M., et al. Effect of screening and adjuvant therapy on mortality from breast cancer. New England Journal of Medicine 2005, 353:1784-1792.
6. Boyle J.M. Survey of female veterans: A study of the needs, attitudes and experiences of women veterans [Study conducted for the Veterans Administration]. 843002 1985, Louis Harris and Associates, Harris (Louis) and Associates, Inc, New York, NY, 1-299.
7. Briggs A.H. Handling uncertainty in economic evaluation and presenting the results. Economic evaluation in healthcare 2001, 172-214. Oxford University Press, Oxford. M. Drummond, A. Maguire (Eds.).
8. Briggs A.H., O'Brien B.J. The death of cost-minimization analysis?. Health Economics 2001, 10:179-184.
9. Bureau of Labor Statistics The consumer price index (CPI) 2008, 19 November, U.S. Department of Labor.
10. Cancer Intervention Surveillance Modeling Network (CISNET) Breast Cancer Collaborators Executive summary. Journal of National Cancer Institute Monographs 2006, 36:1-2.
11. Costanza M., Stoddard A., Luckmannl R., White M., Spitz Avrunin J., Clemow L. Promoting mammography: Results of a randomized trial of telephone counseling and a medical practice intervention. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 2000, 19:39-46.
12. Crane L.A., Leakey T.A., Ehrsam G., Rimer B.K., Warnecke R.B. Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of multiple outcalls to promote mammography among low-income women. Cancer Epidemiology, Biomarkers & Prevention 2000, 9:923-931.
13. de Koning H.J. Breast cancer screening; cost-effective in practice?. European Journal of Radiology 2000, 33:32-37.
14. del Junco D., Vernon S., Coan S., Tiro J., Bastian L., Savas L., et al. Promoting regular mammography screening I. A systematic assessment of validity in a randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008, 100:333-346.
15. Department of Veterans Affairs 2001 National Survey of Veterans (NSV). Final report 2004, Department of Veterans Affairs, pp. 1-139. 7-15-2008. http://www.va.gov/vetdata/SurveyResults/index.htm.
16. Harris R. Effectiveness: The next question for breast cancer screening. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2005, 97:1021-1023.
17. Health Economics Resource Center Overview of the VA cost distribution report 2002, 22 October, Department of Veterans Affairs. http://www.herc.research.va.gov/data/cdr.asp.
18. Javitt M., Hendrick R. Revealing the Oz behind the curtain: USPSTF screening mammography guidelines and the hot air balloon. Americn Journal of Roentgenology 2010, 194:289-290.
19. Kerlikowske K., Grady D., Rubin S., Sandrock C., Ernster V. Efficacy of screening mammography: A meta analysis. JAMA 1995, 273:149-154.
20. Kerlikowske K., Salzmann P., Phillips K.A., Cauley J.A., Cummings S.R. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: Impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness. JAMA 1999, 282:2156-2163.
21. Lindfors K.K., Rosenquist C.J. The cost-effectiveness of mammographic screening strategies. JAMA 1995, 274:881-884.
22. Lynch F.L., Whitlock E.P., Valanis B.G., Smith S.K. Cost-effectiveness of a tailored intervention to increase screening in HMO women overdue for Pap test and mammography services. Preventive Medicine 2004, 38:403-411.
23. SEER cancer statistics review, 1975-2005 2008, National Cancer Institute, Bethesda, MD. L.A.G. Ries, D. Melbert, M. Krapcho, D.G. Stinchcomb, N. Howlader, M.J. Horner (Eds.).
24. Ritzwoller D.P., Sukhanova A., Gaglio B., Glasgow R.E. Costing behavioral interventions: A practical guide to enhance translation. Annals of Behavioral Medicine 2009, 37:218-227.
25. Saywell R.M., Champion V.L., Skinner C.S., Menon U., Daggy J. A cost-effectiveness comparison of three tailored interventions to increase mammography screening. Journal of Womens Health 2004, 13:909-918.
26. Smith M. VA employee salary data 2003, Personal Communication.
27. Sohl S.J., Moyer A. Tailored interventions to promote mammography screening: A meta-analytic review. Preventive Medicine 2007, 45:252-261.
28. Stockdale S.E., Keeler E., Duan N., Derose K.P., Fox S.A. Costs and cost-effectiveness of a church-based intervention to promote mammography screening. Health Services Research 2000, 35:1037-1057.
29. Stout N.K., Rosenberg M.A., Trentham-Dietz A., Smith M.A., Robinson S.M., Fryback D.G. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2006, 98:774-782.
30. Urban N., Self S., Kessler L., Prentice R., Henderson M., Iverson D., et al. Analysis of the costs of a large prevention trial. Controlled Clinical Trials 1990, 11(2):129-146.
31. van der Maas P.J., de Koning H.J., van Ineveld B.M., van Oortmarssen G.J., Habbema J.D., Lubbe K.T., et al. The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. International Journal of Cancer 1989, 43:1055-1060.
32. Vernon S., McQueen A., Tiro J., del Junco D.J. Interventions to promote repeat breast cancer screening with mammography: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2010, 102:1-17.
33. Vernon S.W., del Junco D.J., Tiro J.A., Coan S.P., Perz C.A., Bastian L.A., et al. Promoting regular mammography screening II. Results from a randomized controlled trial in US women veterans. Journal of the National Cancer Institute 2008, 100:347-358.