Analysing stories using schemes

Legal Evidence and Proof: Statistics, Stories, Logic

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 93-116

  Bex, Floris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRONINGEN   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 79951769156     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: None     Document Type: Chapter

References (23)

1. Anderson, T.J., Schum, D.A. and Twining, W.L. (2005), Analysis of Evidence, 2nd Edition (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
2. Bennett, W.L. and Feldman, M.S. (1981), Reconstructing Reality in the Courtroom: Justice and Judgment in American Culture (London: Methuen-Tavistock).
3. Bex, F.J. and Prakken, H. (2004), 'Reinterpreting Arguments in Dialogue: An Application to Evidential Reasoning', in JURIX 2004: The Seventeenth Annual Conference (Amsterdam: IOS Press), pp. 119-29.
4. Bex, F.J., Prakken, H. and Verheij, B. (2006), 'Anchored Narratives in Reasoning about Evidence', in Van Engers (ed.).
5. Bex, F.J., Prakken, H. and Verheij, B. (2007), 'Formalising Argumentative Story-based Analysis of Evidence', Proceedings of the Eleventh International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Law (New York: ACM Press), pp. 1-10.
6. Bobrow, D.G. and Collins, A. (eds) (1975), Representation and Understanding: Studies in Cognitive Science (New York: Academic Press).
7. Cohen, L.J. (1977), The Probable and The Provable (Oxford: Oxford University Press).
8. Crombag, H.F.M., Wagenaar, W.A. and Koppen, P.J. van (1994), Dubieuze Zaken: de psychologie van strafrechtelijk bewijs, 2nd Edition (Amsterdam: Contact).
9. Engers, T.M. van (ed.) (2006), Legal Knowledge and Information Systems. JURIX 2006: The Nineteenth Annual Conference (Amsterdam: IOS Press), pp. 11-20.
10. Hastie, R. (ed.) (1993), Inside the Juror, the Psychology of Juror Decision Making (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press).
11. Lucas, P. (1997), 'Symbolic diagnosis and its formalisation', The Knowledge Engineering Review 12, 109-46.
12. Mandler, J.M. and Johnson, N.S. (1977), 'Remembrance of things parsed: Story structure and recall', Cognitive Psychology 9, 111-51.
13. Nijboer, J.F. and Malsch, M. (eds) (1999), Complex Cases: Perspectives on the Netherlands Criminal Justice System (Amsterdam: Thela Thesis).
14. Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1986), 'Evidence evaluation in complex decision making', Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 51, 242-58.
15. Pennington, N. and Hastie, R. (1993), 'The Story Model for Juror Decision Making', in Hastie (ed.).
16. Poot, C.J. de, Bokhorst, R.J., Koppen, P.J. van and Muller, E.R. (2004), Rechercheportret - Over dilemma's in de opsporing (Alphen a.d. Rijn: Kluwer).
17. Rumelhart, D.E. (1975), 'Notes on a Schema for Stories', in Bobrow and Collins (eds).
18. Schank, R.C. (1986), Explanations Patterns: Understanding Mechanically and Creatively (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum).
19. Schank, R.C. and Abelson, R.P. (1977), Scripts, Plans, Goals and Understanding: An Inquiry into Human Knowledge Structures (Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum).
20. Thagard, P. (2004), 'Causal inference in legal decision making: Explanatory coherence vs. Bayesian networks', Applied Artificial Intelligence, 18, 231-49.
21. Twining, W.L. (1999), 'Necessary but Dangerous? Generalizations and Narrative in Argumentation about 'Facts' in Criminal Process', in Nijboer and Malsch (eds).
22. Walton, D.N. (1996), Argumentation Schemes for Presumptive Reasoning (Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates).
23. Wigmore, J.H. (1931), The Principles of Judicial Proof or the Process of Proof as Given by Logic, Psychology, and General Experience, and Illustrated in Judicial Trials, 2nd Edition (Boston: Little, Brown & Company).