Interactive visualization of multi-resolution urban building models considering spatial cognition

International Journal of Geographical Information Science

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 5-24

  Yang, Ling ^a   Zhang, Liqiang ^a   Ma, Jingtao ^b   Xie, Jinghan ^a   Liu, Liu ^a  

^a BEIJING NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b University Hospital   (United States)

Author keywords

Hierarchical tree; Lod; Massive urban models; Spatial cognition

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; GIS; HIERARCHICAL SYSTEM; NUMERICAL MODEL; SPATIAL COGNITION; SPATIAL DATA; SPATIAL RESOLUTION; TRIANGULATION; VISUALIZATION;

EID: 79951760891     PISSN: 13658816     EISSN: 13623087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/13658816.2010.488239     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. Allouche, M. and Moulin, B., 2005. Amalgamation in cartographic generalization using Kohonen's feature nets. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 19 (8), 899-914.
2. Anders, K.H., 2005. Level of detail generation of 3D building groups by aggregation and typification. In: Proceedings 22nd international cartographic conference, 9-16 August 2005, La Corun ̃a, Spain, ICA, Canadian Institute & Geomatics, 9-16.
3. Anders, K.H. and Sester, M., 2000. Parameter-free cluster detection in spatial databases and its application to typification. ISPRS Archives for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 23, Part 4 [CD-ROM].
4. Bai, F.W. and Chen, X.Y., 2001. Generalization for 3D GIS. In: J. Chen, et al., eds. Proceedings of the 3rd ISPRS workshop on dynamic and multi-dimensional GIS, 23-25 May 2001, Bangkok, Thailand, ISPRS Press, 8-11.
5. Brassel, K. and Weibel, R., 1988. A review and framework of automated map generalization. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems, 2 (3), 229-244.
6. Chang, R., et al., 2008. Legible simplification of textured urban models. IEEE Computer Graphics and Applications, 28 (3), 27-36.
7. Cignoni, P., et al., 2007. Ray-casted BlockMaps for large urban models visualization. Computer Graphics Forum, 26 (3), 405-413.
8. Fan, H.C., Meng, L.Q., and Jahnke, M., 2009. Generalization of 3D buildings modelled by CityGML. In: Advances in GIScience, proceedings of the 12th AGILE conference, 2-5 June 2009, Hannover, Germany, New York: Springer, 387-405.
9. Forberg, A., 2007. Generalization of 3D building data based on a scale-space approach. ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 62 (2), 104-111.
10. Forberg, A. and Mayer, H., 2002. Generalization of 3D building data based on scale-space. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, XXXIV (4), 225-230.
11. Glander, T. and Döllner, J., 2008. Automated cell based generalization of virtual 3D city models with dynamic landmark highlighting. In: Proceedings of the 11th ICA workshop on generalization and multiple representation, 20-21 June 2008, Montpellier, France, Canadian Institute & Geomatics.
12. Glander, T., and Döllner, J., 2009. Abstract representations for interactive visualization of virtual 3D city models. Computers, Environment and Urban Systems, 33 (5), 375-387.
13. Graham, R.L., 1972. An efficient algorithm for determining the convex hull of a finite planar set. Information Processing Letters, 26, 132-133.
14. Gröger, G., Kolbe, T.H., and Czerwinski, A., 2006. Candidate OpenGIS CityGML implementation specification. Technical Report, Open Geospatial Consortium, Inc.
15. Harrie, L., 1999. The constraint method for solving spatial conflicts in cartographic generalization. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 26 (1), 55-69.
16. Kada, M. and Luo, F., 2006. Generalisation of building ground plans using half-spaces. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on geospatial databases for sustainable development, 25-30 September 2006, Goa, India. ISPRS Technical Commission IV.
17. Li, Z., et al., 2004. Automated building generalization based on urban morphology and Gestalt theory. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 18 (5), 513-534.
18. Li, Z.L., 2007. Algorithmic foundation of multi-scale spatial representation. Bacon Raton, FL: CRC Press (Taylor & Francis Group), pp. 281.
19. Lynch, K., 1960. The image of the city. Cambridge, MA and London, UK: MIT Press, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 5-8.
20. Meng, L.Q. and Forberg, A., 2007. 3D building generalisation. In: W. Mackaness, A. Ruas and T. Sarjakoski, eds. Challenges in the portrayal of geographic information. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
21. Regnauld, N., 1996. Recognition of building clusters for generalization. In: M. Molennar and M.J. Kraak, eds. Advances in GIS II. London: Taylor & Francis, 185-198.
22. Regnauld, N., 2001. Contextual building typification in automated map generalization. Algorithmica, 30, 312-333.
23. Royan, J., Balter, R., and Bouville, C., 2006. Hierarchical representation of virtual cities for progressive transmission over networks. In: 3DPTV'06: proceedings of the third international symposium on 3D data processing, visualization, and transmission, 14-16 June 2006, University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, USA, IEEE Computer Society Press, 432-439.
24. Royan, J., Bouville, C., and Gioia, P., 2003. PBTree: a new progressive and hierarchical representation for network-based navigation in urban environments. In: VMV'03: proceedings of the vision, modeling, and visualization conference (VMV 2003), 19-21 November 2003, München, Germany, Aka GmBH, Germany, 299-307.
25. Sester, M., 2000. Generalization based on least squares adjustment. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 33, 931-938.
26. Thiemann, F., 2002. Generalization of 3D building data. In: Proceedings of ISPRS commission II symposium 'geospatial theory, processing and. applications', Ottawa, Canada. International Archives of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing, 34(Part 4) [CD-Rom].
27. Visvalingam, M. and Whyatt, J.D., 1993. Line generalisation by repeated elimination of points. The Cartographic Journal, 30 (1), 46-51.
28. Wertheimer, M., 1923. Law of organization in perceptual forms. In: W.D. Ellis, ed. A source book of Gestalt psychology. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner, 71-88.