A formalism for extending the NFR framework to support the composition of the goal trees

Proceedings - Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference, APSEC

Volumn , Issue , 2010, Pages 23-32

  Wei, Bo ^a   Jin, Zhi ^b   Liui, Lin ^c  

^a CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

^b PEKING UNIVERSITY   (China)

^c TSINGHUA UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Multiple viewpoints; NFR framework; Non functional requirements; Softgoal; Viewpoint composition

Indexed keywords

MULTIPLE VIEWPOINTS; NFR FRAMEWORK; NON-FUNCTIONAL REQUIREMENTS; SOFTGOAL; VIEWPOINT COMPOSITION;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 79951742389     PISSN: 15301362     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/APSEC.2010.13     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. A. Ryan, "An approach to quantitative non-functional requirements in software development," in the 34th Annual Government Electronics and Information Association Conference, 2000.
2. L. Cysneiros and J. Leite, "Nonfunctional requirements: From elicitation to conceptual models," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 30, no. 5, pp. 328-350, 2004.
3. L. Chung and J. do Prado Leite, "On non-functional requirements in software engineering," Conceptual Modeling: Foundations and Applications, LNCS, vol. 5600, pp. 363-379, 2009.
4. L. Chung and B. Nixon, "Dealing with non-functional requirements: Three experimental studies of a process-oriented approach," in the 17th International Conference on Software Engineering, 1995, pp. 24-28.
5. J. Mylopoulos, L. Chung, and B. Nixon, "Representing and using nonfunctional requirements: A process-oriented approach," IEEE Trans. Software Engineering, vol. 18, no. 6, pp. 483-497, 1992.
6. H. A. Simon, "The science of design: Creating the artificial," The Architecture of Complexity: Sciences of Artificial, 3rd edition, pp. 129-159, 1996.
7. A. van Lamsweerde, "Engineering requirements for system reliability and security," Software System Reliability and Security, vol. 9, pp. 196-238, 2004.
8. * framework," SIGGROUOP Bull, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 59-63, 1997.
9. E. Yu, "Towards modelling and reasoning support for early-phase requirements engineering," in the 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Requirements Engineering, 1997, pp. 226-235.
10. P. Giorgini, J. Mylopoulos, E. Nicchiarelli, and R. Sebastiani, "Reasoning with goal models," Spaccapietra, S., March, S.T., Kambayashi, Y. (eds.) ER 2002. LNCS, vol. 2503, pp. 167-181, 2002.
11. A. v. Lamsweerde, "Goal-oriented requirements engineering: A guided tour," in the 5th IEEE international Symposium on Requirements Engineering. IEEE Computer Society, August 27-31 2001, p. 249. 1
12. A. van Lamsweerde, "Managing conflicts in goal-driven requirements engineering," IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, vol. 44, no. 11, 1998.
13. R. Balzer, "Tolerating inconsistency," in the 13th International Conference on Software Engineering. IEEE Computer Society Press, 1991, pp. 158-165. (Pubitemid 21689983)
14. D. Gabby and A. Hunter, "Making inconsistency respectable: Part 1 - a logical framework for inconsistency in reasoning," in Fundamentals of Artificial Intelligence Research, LNCS, vol. 535. Springer Verlag, 1991, pp. 19-32.
15. D. Gabby and Hunter, "Making inconsistency respectable: Part 2 - meta-level handling of inconsistency," in Symbolic and Quantitative Approaches to Reasoning and Uncertainty, LNCS, vol. 747. Springer Verlag, 1993, pp. 129-136.
16. B. Nuseibeh, S. Easterbrook, and A. Russo, "Leveraging inconsistency in software development," IEEE Computer, vol. 33, pp. 24-29, 2000. (Pubitemid 30585683)
17. I. Jureta, S. Faulkner, and P. Schobbens, "A more expressive softgoal conceptualization for quality requirements analysis," in the 25th International Conference on Conceptual Modeling (ER06), 2006.
18. J. Castro, M. Kolp, and J. Mylopoulos, "Towards requirements-driven information systems engineering: the tropos project," Information System, vol. 6, pp. 365-389, 2002. (Pubitemid 34777271)
19. L. Liu and E. Yu, "Designing information systems in social context: a goal and scenario modeling approach," Information System, vol. 29, pp. 187-203, 2003.
20. P. Donzelli, "A goal-driven and agent-based requirements engineering framework," Requirements Engineering, vol. 9, pp. 16-39, 2004. (Pubitemid 38237076)
21. A. Fuxman, L. Liu, J. Mylopoulos, M. Pistore, M. Roveri, and P. Traverso, "Specifying and analyzing early requirements in tropos," Requirements Engineering, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 132-150, 2004. (Pubitemid 38722271)
22. *, and aspectt in the context of multi-agent systems," in the Conference of the Center For Advanced Studies on Collaborative Research, CASCON 2006. ACM, New York, October 16-19 2006, p. 16.
23. E. Letier and A. van Lamsweerde, "Reasoning about partial goal satisfaction for requirements and design engineering," in ACM SIGSOFT Symp. Foundation of Software Engineering, 2004, pp. 53-62. (Pubitemid 40787567)