Framing environmental risks in the baltic sea: A news media analysis

Ambio

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2011, Pages 121-132

  Jönsson, Anna Maria ^a  

^a SÖDERTÖRN UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

Author keywords

Baltic Sea; Complexity; Framing; News media; Risk; Uncertainty

Indexed keywords

BIOMONITORING; CHEMICAL POLLUTANT; ENVIRONMENTAL DISTURBANCE; EUTROPHICATION; GOVERNANCE APPROACH; HAZARDOUS WASTE; OVERFISHING; UNCERTAINTY ANALYSIS;

ARTICLE; BALTIC STATES; ECOSYSTEM; EUTROPHICATION; MASS MEDIUM; POLITICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; SEA; WATER POLLUTANT;

BALTIC STATES; ECOSYSTEM; EUTROPHICATION; MASS MEDIA; OCEANS AND SEAS; POLITICS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK MANAGEMENT; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

ATLANTIC OCEAN; BALTIC SEA;

EID: 79951735490     PISSN: 00447447     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s13280-010-0124-2     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Allan, S., B. Adam, and C. Carter. 2000. Introduction: The media politics of environmental risks. In Environmental risks and the media. London: UCL.
2. Altheide, D.L., and R.T. Snow. 1979. Media logic, vol. 89. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.
3. Anderson, A. 1997. Media culture and the environment. London: Routledge.
4. Asp, K., and P. Esaiasson. 1996. The modernization of Swedish campaigns: Individualization, professionalization, and medialization. In Politics, media, and modern democracy: an international study of innovations in electoral campaigning and their consequences, ed. D.L. Swanson, and P. Mancini. Westport: Praeger.
5. Bäckstrand, K. 2003. Civic science for sustainability: Reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Global Environmental Politics 3: 24-41.
6. Beck, U. 1992. Risk society. London: SAGE.
7. Bohman, J. 2004. Expanding dialogue: The Internet, the public sphere and prospects for transnational democracy. The Sociological Review 52: 131-155. doi:10.1111/j.1467-954X.2004.00477.x.
8. Boholm, M. 2008. Komplexa risker i Göta älvdalen. En innehållsanalys av medierapportering, 1994-2007. Cefos, Rapport 2008:1. Göteborgs Universitet (in Swedish)
9. CEC (Commission of the European Communities). 2001. European Governance. A White Paper, 25.7.2001 COM (2001) 428 final, Brussels.
10. Cox, R. 2006. Environmental communication and the public sphere. London: SAGE Publications Ltd.
11. Dahlgren, P. 1995. Television and the public sphere. London: SAGE Publications.
12. Djerf-Pierre, M. 1996. Gröna nyheter. Miljoj̈ournalistiken i televisionens nyhetssändningar 1961-1994. Institutionen för Journalistik och masskommunikation, Göteborgs Universitet (in Swedish, English summary).
13. Dunwoody, S., and H.P. Peters. 1992. Mass media coverage of technological and environmental risks: A survey of research in the United States and Germany. Public Understanding of Science 1: 199-230.
14. Egan Sjölander, A., K. Wolanik-Boström, and K. Ögren. 2010. Framing Chemicals in Sweden and Poland. Journalists' narratives and media texts. In Regulating Chemical Risks: European and Global Challenges, eds. J. Eriksson, M. Gilek, and C. Ruden. Dordrecht: Springer.
15. Entman, R.M. 1993. Framing: toward clarification of a fractured paradigm. Journal of Communication 43(4): 51-58.
16. Friedman, S.M., S. Dunwoody, and C.L. Rogers. 1999. Communicating uncertainty. Media Coverage of new and controversial science. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
17. Galtung, J., and M.H. Ruge. 1965. The structure of foreign news. Journal of Peace research 2: 64-91.
18. Goffman, E. 1974. Frame analysis: An essay on the organization of experience. New York: Harper & Row.
19. Habermas, J. 1989. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge: MIT Press.
20. Hadenius, S., L. Weibull, and I. Wadbring. 2008. Massmedier. Press, radio och tv i den digitala tidsåldern. Stockholm: Ekerlids förslag (in Swedish).
21. Hansen, A. 2010. Environment, media and communication. London: Routledge
22. HELCOM. 2007. HELCOM Baltic Sea Action Plan. HELCOM Ministarial Meeting, Krakow, Poland, 15 November 2007.
23. HELCOM. 2010. Ecosystem Health of the Baltic Sea. HELCOM initial holistic assessment, BSEP No. 122.
24. Hermansson, C. 2002. Det återvunna folkhemmet. TV-journalistik och Miljöpolitik i Sverige 1987-1998. Linkoping Studies in Arts and Science 252 (in Swedish, English summary).
25. Hornmoen, H. 2009. What researchers now can tell us-representing scientific uncertainty in journalism. Observatorio 3(4).
26. Kjellén, B. 2007. Svensk politik för miljö och hållbar utveckling i ett internationellt perspektiv. En förhandlare reflekterar. Rapport till expertgruppen för miljöstudier 2007:3. Regeringskansliet, Finansdepartementet (in Swedish).
27. Lyytimäki, J. 2007. Temporalities and environmental reporting: Press news on eutrophication in Finland. Environmental Sciences 4(1): 41-51.
28. Mazzoleni, G., and W. Schulz. 1999. Mediatization of politics: A challenge for democracy? Political Communication 16(3): 247-261.
29. McCombs, M. 2005. A look at agenda-setting: Past, present and future. Journalism Studies 6(4): 543-557.
30. McCombs, M., and D. Shaw. 1972. The agenda setting function of the mass media. Public Opinion Quarterly 36: 176-187.
31. Nelkin, D. 1995. Selling science. How the press covers science and technology. New York: Freeman and Company.
32. Nilsson, Å., J.B. Reitan, A. Tönnessen, and R. Waldahl. 2000. Reporting radiation and other risk issues in Norwegian and Swedish Newspapers. Nordicom-Review no 1/2000, NORDI-COM, Göteborgs Universitet.
33. Nord, L., and J. Strömbäck. 2005. Hot på agendan. En analys av nyhetsförmedlingen om risker och kriser. KBM:S Temaserie 2005:7 (in Swedish).
34. Pan, Z., and G.M. Kosicki. 1993. Framing analysis: An approach to news discourse. Political Communication 10(1): 55-75.
35. Peters, H.P. 1995. The interaction of journalists and scientific experts: co-operation and conflict between two professional cultures. Media, Culture & Society 17: 31-48.
36. Rein, M., and D.A. Schön. 1993. Reframing policy discourse. In The argumentative turn in policy analysis, planning, ed. F. Fischer, and J. Forester. London: Duke University Press.
37. Reis, R. 2008. How Brazilian and North American Newspapers frame the stem cell research debate. Science Communication 29: 316-334.
38. Renn, O. 2008. Risk governance coping with uncertainty in a complex world. London: Earthscan.
39. Schulz, W. 2004. Reconstructing mediatization as an analytical concept. European Journal of Communication 19(1): 87-101. (Pubitemid 38389623)
40. Shoemaker, P., and S. Reese. 1996. Mediating the message theories of influences on mass media content. White Plains: Longman.
41. Sparks, C. 2001. The Internet and the global public sphere. In Mediated politics. Communication in the Future of democracy, ed. L.W. Bennett, and R.M. Entman. Cambridge: University Press.
42. Stocking, H.S. 1999. How journalists deal with scientific uncertainty. In Communicating uncertainty. Media coverage of new, controversial science, ed. S.M. Friedman, S. Dunwoody, and C.L. Rogers. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
43. Strömbäck, J. 2008. Four phases of mediatization: An analysis of the mediatization of politics. The International Journal of Press/Politics 13(3): 228-246.
44. Weaver, D.H. 2007. Thoughts on agenda setting, framing, and priming. Journal of Communication 57: 142-147. (Pubitemid 46322694)