Endorsement of the CONSORT and STROBE statements for plastic surgical clinical trials

Annals of Plastic Surgery

Volumn 66, Issue 3, 2011, Pages 321-

  Knobloch, Karsten ^a   Yoon, Uzung ^a   Vogt, Peter M ^a  

^a HANNOVER MEDICAL SCHOOL   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; NOTE; PLASTIC SURGERY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PUBLICATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL (TOPIC); STANDARD;

HUMANS; PERIODICALS AS TOPIC; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; QUALITY CONTROL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC; RESEARCH DESIGN; RESEARCH SUPPORT AS TOPIC; SURGERY, PLASTIC;

EID: 79951734847     PISSN: 01487043     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181d3f29b     Document Type: Letter

References (5)

1. Momeni A, Becker A, Bannasch H, et al. Association between research sponsorship and study outcome in plastic surgery literature. Ann Plast Surg. 2009;63:661-664.
2. Pitak-Arnnop P, Sader R, Rapidis AD, et al. Publication bias in oral and maxillofacial surgery journals: an observation on published controlled trials. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2010;38:4-10.
3. Begg C, Cho M, Eastwood S, et al. Improving the quality of reporting of randomized controlled trials. The CONSORT statement. JAMA. 1996;276: 637-639. (Pubitemid 26278070)
4. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, et al. STROBE Initiative. The strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453-1457.
5. Fung AE, Palanki R, Barki SJ, et al. Applying the CONSORT and STROBE statements to evaluate the reporting quality of neovascular age-related macular degeneration studies. Ophthalmology. 2009;116:286-296.