Wavelet shrinkage: Unification of basic thresholding functions and thresholds

Signal, Image and Video Processing

Volumn 5, Issue 1, 2011, Pages 11-28

  Atto, Abdourrahmane M ^a   Pastor, Dominique ^a   Mercier, Grégoire ^a  

^a ECOLE DES MINES DE NANTES   (France)

Author keywords

Detection thresholds; Non parametric estimation; Penalty function; Shrinkage function; Wavelets

Indexed keywords

EQUIVALENCE CLASSES; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SIGNAL ANALYSIS;

DETECTION THRESHOLD; NON-PARAMETRIC ESTIMATIONS; PENALTY FUNCTION; SHRINKAGE FUNCTIONS; WAVELETS;

SHRINKAGE;

EID: 79951725611     PISSN: 18631703     EISSN: 18631711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11760-009-0139-y     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Donoho D. L., Johnstone I. M.: Ideal spatial adaptation by wavelet shrinkage. Biometrika 81(3), 425-455 (1994).
2. Bruce A. G., Gao H. Y.: Understanding waveshrink: variance and bias estimation. Biometrika 83(4), 727-745 (1996).
3. Donoho D. L., Johnstone I. M.: Adapting to unknown smoothness via wavelet shrinkage. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 90(432), 1200-1224 (1995).
4. Atto, A. M., Pastor, D., Mercier, G.: Detection threshold for non-parametric estimation. Signal, Image and Video Processing, vol. 2(3). Springer, Heidelberg (2008).
5. Simoncelli, E. P., Adelson, E. H.: Noise removal via bayesian wavelet coring. IEEE Int. Conf. Image Proc. (ICIP) 379-382 (1996).
6. Do M. N., Vetterli M.: Wavelet-based texture retrieval using generalized gaussian density and kullback-leibler distance. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 11(2), 146-158 (2002).
7. Şendur L., Selesnick I. V.: Bivariate shrinkage functions for wavelet-based denoising exploiting interscale dependency. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 11, 2744-2756 (2002).
8. Portilla J., Strela V., Wainwright M. J., Simoncelli E. P.: Image denoising using scale mixtures of gaussians in the wavelet domain. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 12(11), 1338-1351 (2003).
9. Johnstone I. M., Silverman B. W.: Empirical bayes selection of wavelet thresholds. Ann. Stat. 33(4), 1700-1752 (2005).
10. ter Braak C. J. F.: Bayesian sigmoid shrinkage with improper variance priors and an application to wavelet denoising. Comput. Stat. Data Anal. 51(2), 1232-1242 (2006).
11. Gao H. Y.: Waveshrink shrinkage denoising using the non-negative garrote. J. Comput. Graph. Stat. 7(4), 469-488 (1998).
12. Antoniadis A., Fan J.: Regularization of wavelet approximations. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 96(455), 939-955 (2001).
13. Luisier F., Blu T., Unser M.: A new sure approach to image denoising: interscale orthonormal wavelet thresholding. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 16(3), 593-606 (2007).
14. Atto, A. M., Pastor, D., Mercier, G.: Smooth sigmoid wavelet shrinkage for non-parametric estimation. IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech, and Signal Processing, ICASSP, Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, 30 March-4 April (2008).
15. Pastor, D., Atto, A. M.: Sparsity from binary hypothesis testing and application to non-parametric estimation. European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO, Lausanne, Switzerland, August 25-29 (2008).
16. Benedetto, J. J., Frasier, M. W.: Wavelets: Mathematics and applications. CRC Press, Boca Raton (1994), chap. 9: Wavelets, probability, and statistics: Some bridges, by Christian Houdré, pp. 365-398.
17. Zhang J., Walter G.: A wavelet-based KL-like expansion for wide-sense stationary random processes. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. 42(7), 1737-1745 (1994).
18. Leporini D., Pesquet J.-C.: High-order wavelet packets and cumulant field analysis. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 45(3), 863-877 (1999).
19. Atto A. M., Pastor D., Isar A.: On the statistical decorrelation of the wavelet packet coefficients of a band-limited wide-sense stationary random process. Signal Process. 87(10), 2320-2335 (2007).
20. Atto, A. M., Pastor, D.: Limit distributions for wavelet packet coefficients of band-limited stationary random processes. European Signal Processing Conference, EUSIPCO, Lausanne, Switzerland, 25-28 August (2008).
21. Flandrin P.: Wavelet analysis and synthesis of fractional brownian motion. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 38(2), 910-917 (1992).
22. Tewfik A. H., Kim M.: Correlation structure of the discrete wavelet coefficients of fractional brownian motion. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 38(2), 904-909 (1992).
23. Dijkerman R. W., Mazumdar R. R.: On the correlation structure of the wavelet coefficients of fractional brownian motion. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 40(5), 1609-1612 (1994).
24. Kato T., Masry E.: On the spectral density of the wavelet transform of fractional brownian motion. J. Time Ser. Anal. 20(50), 559-563 (1999).
25. Craigmile P. F., Percival D. B.: Asymptotic decorrelation of between-scale wavelet coefficients. IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 51(3), 1039-1048 (2005).
26. Antoniadis A.: Wavelet methods in statistics: some recent developments and their applications. Stat. Surveys 1, 16-55 (2007).
27. Berman S. M.: Sojourns and Extremes of Stochastic Processes. Wadsworth and Brooks/Cole, USA (1992).
28. Mallat S.: A Wavelet Tour of Signal Processing, 2nd edn. Academic Press, New York (1999).
29. Coifman, R. R., Donoho, D. L.: Translation invariant de-noising. Lect. Notes Stat. (103), 125-150 (1995).
30. Wang Z., Bovik A. C., Sheikh H. R., Simoncelli E. P.: Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 13(4), 600-612 (2004).
31. Sveinsson J. R., Benediktsson J. A.: Speckle reduction and enhancement of sar images in the wavelet domain. Geosci. Remote Sens. Symp. IGARSS 1, 63-66 (1996).
32. Xie H., Pierce L. E., Ulaby F. T.: Sar speckle reduction using wavelet denoising and markov random field modeling. IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens. 40(10), 2196-2212 (2002).
33. Argenti F., Bianchi T., Alparone L.: Multiresolution map despeckling of sar images based on locally adaptive generalized gaussian pdf modeling. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 15(11), 3385-3399 (2006).
34. Buades A., Coll B., Morel J. M.: A review of image denoising algorithms, with a new one. Multiscale Model. Simul. 4(2), 490-530 (2005).
35. Johnstone I. M., Silverman B. W.: Wavelet threshold estimators for data with correlated noise. J. Royal Stat. Soc. Ser. B 59(2), 319-351 (1997).
36. Müller J. W.: Possible advantages of a robust evaluation of comparisons. J. Res. Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. 105(4), 551-555 (2000).